Jokestress (talk | contribs) →BLPN -: bye |
Off2riorob (talk | contribs) →Magnus Hirschfeld: new section |
||
Line 250: | Line 250: | ||
Hi , your contributions in relation to the living person [[James Cantor]] are the subject of a report at the BLP noticeboard - [[Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#BLP_errors_in_mentions_of_James_Cantor_.28me.29.]] - please comment there, thanks. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 19:51, 22 July 2011 (UTC) |
Hi , your contributions in relation to the living person [[James Cantor]] are the subject of a report at the BLP noticeboard - [[Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#BLP_errors_in_mentions_of_James_Cantor_.28me.29.]] - please comment there, thanks. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 19:51, 22 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Magnus Hirschfeld == |
|||
Hi Jokestress - James Cantor has commented to me that you showed up at this article having never edited it prior to him editing there and that he is concerned about hounding. Could I suggest you avoid interaction in such ways if at all possible, there are plenty of articles without editing articles J Cantor has just edited. I hope you guys can just cease to interact as that would be better than the more extreme administration, such as an official interaction ban or a topic ban, thanks. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 15:50, 28 July 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:50, 28 July 2011
Talk archive
- 2004 talk archives
- 2005 talk archives
- 2006 talk archives
- 2007 talk archives
- 2008 talk archives
- 2009 talk archives
- 2010 talk archives
- Please use the "new section" tab at the top of the page for adding comments, and give your comment a title. Thanks!
This is a nice start. Please send it to WP:DYK. Bearian (talk) 18:32, 10 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. Thank you again for welcoming me here almost four years ago! Bearian (talk) 18:33, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
I PROD'd one of your articles
Hi,
I prod'd one of your articles Hans Hermann Junge. Now it's been deleted was just cleaning up links to it and I see it's in list of articles you created on your user page so you may want to get rid of the link (or recreate it!) Egg Centric (talk) 00:27, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- Also please see User_talk:Courcelles#Do you think this counts as a protested prod? Some advice please in relation to message below Egg Centric (talk) 05:40, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Hans Hermann Junge
Hi not even sure what to do but I kid you not I was looking for info on Hans Hermann Junge husband of Traudl Junge within an hour or so it being 'deleted' from wiki sorry to bother you but have never inquired about a deletion before ... I disagree with the reasoning that the only reason he is important is because he was the deceased husband of Hitler's sercretary. From fragments of info he was a part in some extent of the early entourage of the Nazi Party and therefore has more history than merely being someone's husband. Would be a shame to let even the obscure facts of this part of history slip into a simple honorable mention as a spouse. Hopefully that can be reinstated Kevin B Minneapolis (galwaychase@yahoo.com) thanks in advance —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.28.68.230 (talk) 04:14, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Whteboyz.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Whteboyz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 21:00, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Chris Brand
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Chris Brand requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sturunner (talk) 04:10, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Disambiguator's Barnstar | ||
Thanks for all your hard work on disambiguation pages, it's appreciated. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:31, 12 February 2011 (UTC) |
Copyright problems with Michael Arthur Worden Evans
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Michael Arthur Worden Evans, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2005/12/evans.html, http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0601/pierce.html, http://www.whnpa.org/join/inmemoriam.htm. As a copyright violation, Michael Arthur Worden Evans appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Michael Arthur Worden Evans has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Michael Arthur Worden Evans and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Michael Arthur Worden Evans with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Michael Arthur Worden Evans.
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 12:25, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Regarding this edit, I had a look at the article for Robert Wight and I can't find this fact. I also had a look at List of botanists by author abbreviation and this abbreviation cannot be found there as well. In fact, both of these say that the correction abbreviation for Robert Wight is "Wight". Could you please add the source for this abbreviation, at least to Robert Wight? Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 20:33, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1F, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.aysoarea-1f.org.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:13, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Intentional disambig linking
Greetings! Just a friendly reminder that when you make an intentional link to a disambig page, as you did here in the "See also" section, you should make the link to the "Foo (disambiguation)" redirect so the page does not show up on our lists of pages needing repairs. Cheers! bd2412 T 14:21, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thought you would want to know, some editors are grumbling about the additions of navboxes to dab pages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation#Navbox in dab page. Cheers! bd2412 T 15:33, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hello! Thank you for inviting me to give my opinion about the use of the template {{Letter-NumberCombination}} in 2-letters combinations pages. As the existing template also categorises in the category Letter-Number combinations, I think it would be better to create a new template (with a copy and paste of exactly the same content, but with a different title and a different location of categorisation). Some people with experience in parser functions, html syntax and template design might also help you to create a generalisation of the template if it was what you had in mind. I hope that this helps! --Nono64 (talk) 20:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
people with initials, on dab pages
Hi, I see you've added a lot of people to the PM dab page. I don't think it's normal to include people who just happen not to use their forenames - unless we have evidence that they are referred to as "PM", it's very unlikely that anyone looking for them in the encyclopedia would search for them by initials. We don't list everyone called "John" at John. Hg doesn't list Mr Wells of those initials.
I've just looked again at the page as I left it after some cleanup - and realise that P.M. Dawn isn't a person, anyway - it's a musical ensemble (as you realised). So the only person I should have left is the pseudonymous Swiss writer.
I don't want you to think I'm following you around hassling you, and I'm sorry to waste your work, but I'm going to remove those other people from the dab page because I don't think they belong there. ask other people about this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation. PamD (talk) 08:22, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Ikey-robinson.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ikey-robinson.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 13:36, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
A waste of time.
This article is under the protection of Dreger/WAID's friends and no more reflects an actual account of the book than it would if it came from a pen held in Bailey's hand. There will never be balance, never. An article supported by nothing but an manufactured controversy and arguing that with motivated agents of the author is a waste of time. There never was an interest in a balanced article ,it's just some game to make people believe their input matters. It doesn't , it's old boys. Outside where people can't delete,that is where the adults are. Responsibility for your words. Have a good one. Try not to suppress too much academic freedom ok =) 98.149.114.34 (talk) 18:18, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Leo B. Bozell
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Leo B. Bozell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Tiggerjay (talk) 01:56, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Journey to the End of the Night (game), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://totheendofthenight.com.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:35, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
ANI notice
Just so we don't have a repeat of the issue on a certain talk page, I'm letting you know that User:WhatamIdoing is discussing some of your statements at ANI in this thread. Tijfo098 (talk) 17:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Achille Pierre Dionis du Séjour, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/history/Mathematicians/Dionis.html.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:56, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Broken redirect
Hello. A couple of days ago you created the page Q B Over M with the content #REDIRECT [[Q B Over M]]
. I can't figure out what article you were trying to redirect to, so I hope you can fix it. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:04, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up! Fixed. Jokestress (talk) 16:58, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
I have just read an e-mail message from you; it appears that you sent it some time ago, and I am uncertain what it refers to. I suggest using the {{YGM}} template in the future.
If you believe that I am making any "defamatory and erroneous statements" about you (or anyone else), please feel free to bring them to my attention. I have never intentionally said anything about you that is not easily verifiable, and, as you doubtless know, I am just as willing to publicly correct any errors I make as I am to call a spade a WP:SPADE. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:24, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
BTW
I know this might sound a bit weird, but it would be nice if you didn't create redirects like Advances in High Energy Physics → Hindawi Publishing Corporation. The red link helps editors know an article is missing, and it's what drives article creation (both through the red link and through compilations like WP:JCW). Redirects like Commun. Math. Phys. to Communications in Mathematical Physics are fine and very helpful though. Thanks. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 20:35, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello Jokestress,
I noticed you marked an article as a stub using the {{stub}}
template. Did you know that there are thousands of stub types that you can use to clarify what type of stub the article is? Properly categorizing stubs is important to the Wikipedia community because it helps various WikiProjects to identify articles that need expansion.
If you have questions about stub sorting, don't hesitate to ask! There is a wealth of stub information on the stub sorting WikiProject, and hundreds of stub sorters. Thanks!
Baseball Watcher 16:47, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Please spare a look here. GaneshBhakt (talk) 15:03, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi!
Hi Jokestress! I've sent you an e-mail. Best. Acalamari 21:28, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dennis Howitt, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ss/staff/staff_pubs/howitt.html.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:12, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Shemale-whores-cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Shemale-whores-cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Norma Lyon
Materialscientist (talk) 08:04, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
thanks for expanding the lists of symphonies by key :) most of the others use Wikitables - not my specialty, but should be possible to adapt by cutting and pasting. can try to do so myself later also. (Also will add a few, like Röntgen's late sym in C♯ min. and perhaps others whose key assignment I can establish from observation of score at IMSLP etc. and reference to same there, that I seem to recall and are not in the list yet. Thanks again!) Schissel | Sound the Note! 12:40, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Please contact me before redirecting my page.
Let me exsplain that male to female transsexual is by far the more generic and researched term. You don't have to like it to know that people are going to "look it up." I personally prefer the description. "Trans woman" implies that we are something other than woman. I am not. In any case, the term is the predominant and prevailing term in psychological terms as well as societal understanding. "Trans woman" is a new term, and should be redirected to the male-to-female transsexual, rather than the other way around. I am aware, however, that some people find this term objectionable. Let each stand on it's own, with cross references.
In any case, it is rude to redirect without some discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.221.70.13 (talk) 20:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- I hope User:Jokestress doesn't mind me saying this but, please make a new topic when leaving a message for someone on there talk page and sign your posts as well. Also, "my page" is a really poor term to use around here. --Τασουλα (Shalom!) (talk) 00:10, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- This article should be redirected please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. As it stands right now, this article meets the requirements for speedy deletion because this article duplicates an existing topic See #a10. Planetary Chaos Redux (talk) 14:31, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
I thought...
I would say Hi, and tell you I really respect your work! ^_^ --Τασουλα (Shalom!) (talk) 23:37, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the nice note! Jokestress (talk) 08:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Redirect of the Pagre Male-To-Female Transsexual
I am redirecting it back, Andrea. I have taken down the redirect and requested arbitration with the following statement.
"Please consider this request for arbitration of the redirect of the medical term "Male-To-Female Transsexual," to the popular vernacular "Transwoman." There is a subculture of the transgender community that would like to eradicate formal terminology for the sake of a lesser accepted and little acknowledged set of terms. I personally came across the redirect from "Male to Female Transsexual" to "Transwoman" approximately a month ago. I removed the redirect, only to find it redirected again a week later. I dissassembled the redirect. The redirect was re-established with a statement that it shall stand because the content was a mirror of the content in "Transwoman." This is not true. The content was originally established as the category, "Male-To-Female Transsexual," and was in existence as such for quite a while, before it was redirected to "Transwoman." The current redirect is not the original article. Additionally the current text, found after redirect, acknowledges that the broader acceptance is for the term "Male-to-Female Transsexual," or "Transsexual." Does this mean that, because of the desire of a subculture, a redirect from an established and well understood terminology is appropriate? Further, the term "Male-to-Female Transsexual" has been the medical description of a condition identified in the DSM-IV. To redirect this to a popular culture descriptor is inaccurate, misleading, and possibly damaging. I would suggest that this redirect is more an attempt to redirect popular thinking for a group of individuals' preferred term. The popular and medical vernacular has been hijacked to satisfy the uninformed will of a few individuals. I am transsexual. I find the idea that others like me will find this redirect and assume that this is now the medically and socially accepted term highly objectionable. Please, please intercede.
Leona Klajda"
I am a 60 year old woman. I am a Male-to-Female transsexual. It is the term by which I found my identity, and how I describe myself. I think it is also the term by which many, indeed most of us, identify. I find the term "transwoman" objectionable. I don't think that others get to eliminate or "redirect" the terms by which I identify myself because they prefer something else. The manipulation of Wikipedia is easy. The elimination of an opposing thought, especially these days, should never be allowed.
I hope you understand. I have always respected you, and what you have accopmplished. You are certainly a role model, and one which I have emulated. I was so disapointed to see that you were supporting, what I believe to be, a manipulation of our cultural identity.
I do not support the redirect of the term "Transwoman." Many people feel it to be a good descriptor. I just don't think that others get to eliminate my self-identification because they object to it. What's more, this is our culture, our history. A few shouldn't be able to eliminate it with a few key strokes.
"Male-to-Female Transsexual" was a Wiki page that existed before "Transwoman." To state that a redirect is appropriate because the original page was co-opted is illogical.
In the past, (only once or twice-I don't seek out conflict,) when I have engaged other cultural "icons" over a similar issue, I received indignation. I hope that this will not be the case with you. You always seemed to be someone who was levelheaded, likeable and down to earth. Bless you for taking a side, and most times a good one!
Leona — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeonaHelen (talk • contribs) 17:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Redirects from Male-to-Female Transsexual
As you have indicated, "Male-to-Female Transsexual" to "Trans Woman" was a redirect. The original article was a arbitrarily redirected from a predominantly accepted term. Additionally, it is a term which is a clinical diagnosis. Trans Woman is not. My undoing the original redirect is being deflected, despite the articles' own acknowledgement that the original term is predominant.
This is illogical. The current redirect is unjustified on several levels. I will reconstruct a page, but I will need you to stop redirecting and erasing it. I am securing the necessary permissions. Please assist me, rather than interfering with the process. By erasing the page, you are interfering with the Wikipedia process of contribution and addition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeonaHelen (talk • contribs) 01:07, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for attempting to resolve this in a constructive manner. I apologize for assuming that you were responsible for the redirects. I really think that redirecting to "Transsexual" would be an acceptable interim solution, but I don't understand why the opinion of a few outweigh fact. The term "Male-to-Female Transsexual" has weight, scope, and history that "Transwoman" does not. To me, the redirect is ludicrous. If majority rule is the deciding factor, we would have all manner of irrationality and nonsense here (consider what some political fringe groups would do with the term "abortion.") How might I arbitrate this? I would be most interested in creating a factual article with references and footnotes, but if it can be eliminated by the whim of someone who disagrees, what's the point? Thank you again. You gave me some direction and assistance, and it is appreciated. If I was apparently rude or argumentative, I was wrong. I assumed that you supported this redirect, but I believe that you truly want to assist in making a better product. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeonaHelen (talk • contribs) 02:47, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Special Barnstar | |
Just wanted to say i think you are really cool and keep up the good work x RafikiSykes (talk) 02:54, 18 July 2011 (UTC) |
BLPN -
Hi , your contributions in relation to the living person James Cantor are the subject of a report at the BLP noticeboard - Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#BLP_errors_in_mentions_of_James_Cantor_.28me.29. - please comment there, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 19:51, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Magnus Hirschfeld
Hi Jokestress - James Cantor has commented to me that you showed up at this article having never edited it prior to him editing there and that he is concerned about hounding. Could I suggest you avoid interaction in such ways if at all possible, there are plenty of articles without editing articles J Cantor has just edited. I hope you guys can just cease to interact as that would be better than the more extreme administration, such as an official interaction ban or a topic ban, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 15:50, 28 July 2011 (UTC)