dablink notification message (see the FAQ) |
Greentea555 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 11:21, 2 October 2015 (UTC) |
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 11:21, 2 October 2015 (UTC) |
||
==Very Strange Article== |
|||
Hello, you seem like a person that has some insight into Chinese history. I have seen this article [[Cho La incident]] and I find it very biased and it seems unauthentic. The sources are largely Indian, and I could not find any neutral sources for this article. The casualty count and results also seems very odd. Do you have any insight into this matter? I suspect it may be a propaganda article made by nationalistic Indians who felt disappointed after their loss in the [[Sino-Indian War]] [[User:Greentea555|Greentea555]] ([[User talk:Greentea555|talk]]) 08:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:38, 17 November 2015
Welcome
|
Hallo Jiang, Ich kom aus Nord-Westerliche Europa. WELKOM AM WWW! I have read some things like China doesnt have internet because they dont like joogle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.11.134.217 (talk) 20:10, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of twin towns and sister cities in China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gumi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Lhasa ...
I don't have a developed opinion yet on the move but, should there be support, I wondered whether it might be applicable to disambiguate from the proposed Xigazê (prefecture-level city) with something like Xigazê (district). In this case Xigazê could redirect to either title. Its just a thought but I didn't want to disrupt the proposal with a possible technicality. GregKaye 08:09, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
不是我只删台湾的不删韩国的。。
谁会把中华圣公会叫做中华。。 只是巧合,不要激动好不好 还有我是山西太原的。 dennis97519 (talk) 14:48, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
你能说清楚你为啥要撤销修改吗。。。我看不懂你英文说的啥,这边回复一下好不好。。。dennis97519 (talk) 15:30, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
中华香烟,可以说“来条中华”什么的
中华车,“那边开来一辆中华”
中华铅笔,“这是一支中华(型号)”
如果你觉得人们不会那么叫那为什么又要加回去呢?
请读一下 WP:PTM
dennis97519 (talk) 16:13, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
- 这样好吧,把台湾的内容加回来,你删掉的圣公会什么的就不要了,铅笔汽车烟也都留下。我想台湾的中华电信比朝鲜的什么郡要更适合放在这里吧。Jiangyu911 (talk) 19:19, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
July 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Zhonghua may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- *[[Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:31, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Wolong SAR
Hello, I've wanted to inform you that even though like you said it's in Sichuan Province, the references as well as the article states that it is a Special Administrative Region. Therefore, the template had to be added to the article. And Woking had to be added to the template. Even though its structure is different from the other two SARs, according to the provided references, it's still a SAR. Thanks. Seqqis (talk) 08:51, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Hello, Seqqis. Yes you are right. The Wolong SAR is a SAR. But not a province-level SAR, so not belong to the province-level divisions of the PRC. It is de facto a county-level division of the Sichuan province. So, unter no occasion should it be added to the template of province-level divisions of the PRC and therefor the template should NOT be added into the Wolong article. A possible way, if you insist, the county-level division template can be added into the article . If you want, i can give you thousands of references to show how many rovince-level divisions of the PRC there are, in English and in Chinese. IN no official documents the Wolong SAR is seen as a province-level SAR, So, i repeat, you are right, it is still a SAR, but not a province-level SAR. Jiangyu911 (talk) 15:31, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Canada
Please be aware that Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada has a standing practice that we add a Canadian topic's name in French to the infobox only if that form is actually different than the name's form in English (e.g. Montreal vs. Montréal, Greater Sudbury vs. Grand-Sudbury, British Columbia vs. Colombie-Britannique.) There's no value in adding a French name to the infobox as secondary information if that name is spelled the same way as in English (such as "Canada", "Toronto", "Gatineau" or "Ottawa".) Bearcat (talk) 15:31, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Template:Europe and seas labelled map
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. IJA (talk) 16:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Hainan / Dongsha
I can assure you that the Dongsha, Nansha and Xisha islands all fall under the jurisdiction of Hainan alone. Confusion over Guangdong may have arisen as Hainan only became a separate province in 1988. Any mention of control by Guandong is spurious and should be removed. Philg88 ♦talk 09:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
旗子問題
聽說您最近在Template:Country data China開始討論西藏旗的問題。你有可能會感興趣另外一個有問題的條目:Türkvizyon Song Contest。請看看這條目上所謂的“新疆國旗”——很久以前我把這個改成中國國旗,可是有個人在那裡偏偏就要用那個藍色半月旗。上次的討論沒有出任何效果,不知道你有沒有什麼想法。 --benlisquareT•C•E 11:31, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dingyuan Railway Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dingyuan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Very Strange Article
Hello, you seem like a person that has some insight into Chinese history. I have seen this article Cho La incident and I find it very biased and it seems unauthentic. The sources are largely Indian, and I could not find any neutral sources for this article. The casualty count and results also seems very odd. Do you have any insight into this matter? I suspect it may be a propaganda article made by nationalistic Indians who felt disappointed after their loss in the Sino-Indian War Greentea555 (talk) 08:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)