barbed reply to Carlo |
→Diabetes mellitus: new section |
||
Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
:No, I jolly well can't! I believe I mentioned to you before that you cannot expect other editors to do your research for you. I'm usually happy to research very specific queries, but I have too much work planned on [[Wilson's disease]], [[subarachnoid hemorrhage]] and [[familial hypercholesterolemia]] to really start hacking into little-used "me-too" drugs. Perhaps you ought to approach other [[WP:PHARM]] contributors to see if they might be interested. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]] | [[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 16:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC) |
:No, I jolly well can't! I believe I mentioned to you before that you cannot expect other editors to do your research for you. I'm usually happy to research very specific queries, but I have too much work planned on [[Wilson's disease]], [[subarachnoid hemorrhage]] and [[familial hypercholesterolemia]] to really start hacking into little-used "me-too" drugs. Perhaps you ought to approach other [[WP:PHARM]] contributors to see if they might be interested. [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]] | [[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 16:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Diabetes mellitus == |
|||
Hi, |
|||
You recently removed my additions to the Diabetes mellitus page, saying that they were copied from a JDRF homepage and were more appropriate for the JDRF page itself. I am actually on staff at JDRF in the U.S., and I would like your help in incorporating more of our information on the diabetes page. It is true that in fact we are the largest charitable funder and advocate of type 1 diabetes research worldwide... our mission is a cure and we've given over $1 billion to date towards diabetes research. Therefore I feel that a page that discusses diabetes and has a section about cures needs to have some mention of our efforts. Please advise. |
|||
[[User:Rlewinson|Rlewinson]] ([[User talk:Rlewinson|talk]]) 17:56, 18 April 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:56, 18 April 2008
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34,
Chronic fatigue syndrome
Hi, when you are back from break would you give a few sources for your edit? The discussion is here. Thanks. Ward20 (talk) 01:43, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Savant syndrome
Thanks for your concern about the savant syndrome page. I am concerned as well. I am trying to track down everyone I told about it to see who is doing it. How is the page supposed to improve when there are so few sources on it? But as for your comment on my talk page concerning the lack of multiple sources: Dr Treffert you must realize, has done more for savant research than all the other savant specialists combined (not kidding). The only other even worth mentioning is Alen Snyder (the researcher using TMS in Australia). If there were more competant savant specialists rest assured that I would use their research but at the present time only those two are truly reliable. --Aetoss (talk) 13:38, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
RE: Withdrawal of membership in WikiProject Pharmacology
Hello. Yesterday, I joined WikiProject Pharmacology, but today, I have withdrawn from the project, but I will continue to do some research on new drugs. :-) Carlo Banez (talk) 13:49, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- You are free to remain a member of WP:PHARM. More eyes always welcome. JFW | T@lk 20:51, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Does JFW drive his little tank over palestinian children? and other crimes against humanity
"The campaign to de-construct the neurological illness ME, to ridicule its sufferers and, in the process, to redefine a growing body of ‘mentally ill’ subjects, began in the mid eighties. The principle character in the British campaign has been Professor Simon Wessely. Over time, however, the ‘psychiatric lobby’ has gathered new adherents and a large, increasingly organised body of combatants.
The psychiatric lobby is now marked by its financial power – over 11 million being funnelled into the network of clinical centres and funding provided by the Medical Research Council (MRC) to carry out the PACE and FINE trials; its roots in major medical research institutions like the MRC and increasingly its links to corporate lobby groups funded especially by the pharmaceutical companies.
The patient, or ‘sufferer’ group which has been forged simply by its opposition to the psychiatric lobby, has inevitably consisted of disparate groups and individuals. Inevitably, because unlike the psychiatric lobby, this grouping has no common ideological purpose nor does it have a hegemonous leadership. Mainly, as well, this group is composed of people who are ill or their carers, circumstances which leave little room for organised campaigning."
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.108.73.89 (talk) 17:04, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you Alpinist, I think I remember why I decided not to feed trolls from your IP range. Your antisemitic comments further discredit you. JFW | T@lk 20:51, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for the kind welcome! I hope I can help. Asbruckman (talk) 18:48, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Medicine Collaboration of the Fortnight
NCurse work 20:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Pectus excavatum
Hi, I sent the author an email and hope that s/he will get back some time later today. Thanks for your help. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 15:46, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
- Not yet. I'll email a few other people later and see if I can turn up with something. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 23:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.
Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 08:24, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 15 | 7 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 16 | 14 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:24, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
RE: ACE inhibitors
Hello. I have created articles on the following ACE inhibitors:
Could you do further research on these articles? :-) Carlo Banez (talk) 09:04, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- No, I jolly well can't! I believe I mentioned to you before that you cannot expect other editors to do your research for you. I'm usually happy to research very specific queries, but I have too much work planned on Wilson's disease, subarachnoid hemorrhage and familial hypercholesterolemia to really start hacking into little-used "me-too" drugs. Perhaps you ought to approach other WP:PHARM contributors to see if they might be interested. JFW | T@lk 16:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Diabetes mellitus
Hi,
You recently removed my additions to the Diabetes mellitus page, saying that they were copied from a JDRF homepage and were more appropriate for the JDRF page itself. I am actually on staff at JDRF in the U.S., and I would like your help in incorporating more of our information on the diabetes page. It is true that in fact we are the largest charitable funder and advocate of type 1 diabetes research worldwide... our mission is a cure and we've given over $1 billion to date towards diabetes research. Therefore I feel that a page that discusses diabetes and has a section about cures needs to have some mention of our efforts. Please advise.