Warning: Adding unreferenced controversial information about living persons on Donald Trump. (TW) |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Hi Jens. Re the first sentence of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Donald_Trump&diff=733772420&oldid=733769713 this edit], I just want to say that sometimes foreign editors can make huge contributions to articles about U.S. politics. For instance, [[Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act]], about the most contentious piece of U.S. legislation in decades, was brilliantly written and brought to Good Article status (a ''major'' feat) largely by a single editor from the U.K. with some advice and feedback from a handful of editors from the U.S. (including me). Foreign editors are sometimes the best at contentious U.S. politics articles because they tend to be more neutral. I know Trump inflames a lot of passions in Europe, so maybe that doesn't apply to his article, I don't know. But the point is that if you have ideas for how to improve [[Donald Trump]] or other U.S. politics articles, please don't disqualify yourself due to your nationality. Your contributions are welcomed. --[[User:DrFleischman|Dr. Fleischman]] ([[User talk:DrFleischman|talk]]) 17:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC) |
Hi Jens. Re the first sentence of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Donald_Trump&diff=733772420&oldid=733769713 this edit], I just want to say that sometimes foreign editors can make huge contributions to articles about U.S. politics. For instance, [[Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act]], about the most contentious piece of U.S. legislation in decades, was brilliantly written and brought to Good Article status (a ''major'' feat) largely by a single editor from the U.K. with some advice and feedback from a handful of editors from the U.S. (including me). Foreign editors are sometimes the best at contentious U.S. politics articles because they tend to be more neutral. I know Trump inflames a lot of passions in Europe, so maybe that doesn't apply to his article, I don't know. But the point is that if you have ideas for how to improve [[Donald Trump]] or other U.S. politics articles, please don't disqualify yourself due to your nationality. Your contributions are welcomed. --[[User:DrFleischman|Dr. Fleischman]] ([[User talk:DrFleischman|talk]]) 17:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC) |
||
== August 2016 == |
|||
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not add [[Wikipedia:Libel|defamatory]] content to Wikipedia, as you did to [[:Talk:Donald Trump]], especially if it involves [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|living persons]]. ''I have changed the header you reverted at the article and stuck one of your comments as both being violations of policy on [[WP:BLP]]. If you continue down this road, you are risking being blocked.''<!-- Template:uw-defamatory2 --> -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|WV]]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelvi|✓]]</span> 22:02, 13 August 2016 (UTC) |
|||
:@[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] I answered at the talk page of "Donald Trump". Still shocked that neutrality for enWP obviously means not writing what somebody is even when clearly stated and proven by several reliable source. --[[User:Jensbest|Jensbest]] ([[User talk:Jensbest#top|talk]]) 22:54, 13 August 2016 (UTC) |
|||
[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please '''stop adding unreferenced or [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|poorly referenced]] biographical content, especially if controversial''', to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at [[:Donald Trump]]. Content of this nature could be regarded as [[Wikipedia:Libel|defamatory]] and is in violation of [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|Wikipedia policy]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia'''. <!-- Template:uw-biog3 --> -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|WV]]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelvi|✓]]</span> 19:49, 14 August 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:50, 14 August 2016
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
- -- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Donald Trump
Hi Jens. Re the first sentence of this edit, I just want to say that sometimes foreign editors can make huge contributions to articles about U.S. politics. For instance, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, about the most contentious piece of U.S. legislation in decades, was brilliantly written and brought to Good Article status (a major feat) largely by a single editor from the U.K. with some advice and feedback from a handful of editors from the U.S. (including me). Foreign editors are sometimes the best at contentious U.S. politics articles because they tend to be more neutral. I know Trump inflames a lot of passions in Europe, so maybe that doesn't apply to his article, I don't know. But the point is that if you have ideas for how to improve Donald Trump or other U.S. politics articles, please don't disqualify yourself due to your nationality. Your contributions are welcomed. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 17:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)