Gerda Arendt (talk | contribs) →Precious: new section |
|||
Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
::::::Yup, I mean.. it's not the best episode but my fav band is there, so I like it :P. The best part? When U2 staff kicks Homer's butt :P <span style="font-family:'Arial',cursive"> [[User:Miss Bono|<span style="color:#000;"><small>'''Miss Bono'''</small></span>]][[User talk:Miss Bono|<span style="color:#c30000;"><small><sup> [zootalk]</sup></small></span>]]</span> 15:39, 6 September 2013 (UTC) |
::::::Yup, I mean.. it's not the best episode but my fav band is there, so I like it :P. The best part? When U2 staff kicks Homer's butt :P <span style="font-family:'Arial',cursive"> [[User:Miss Bono|<span style="color:#000;"><small>'''Miss Bono'''</small></span>]][[User talk:Miss Bono|<span style="color:#c30000;"><small><sup> [zootalk]</sup></small></span>]]</span> 15:39, 6 September 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Precious == |
|||
<div style="margin: auto; max-width: 60em; {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba( 192, 192, 192, 0.75 )}} {{border-radius|1em}} border: 1px solid #a7d7f9; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0.5em 1em 1em; color: black;" class="ui-helper-clearfix"> |
|||
<div> |
|||
<div style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; background-color: #ddd; border: 5px solid #ddd; {{box-shadow|0.1em|0.1em|0.5em|rgba(0,0,0,0.75)}} {{border-radius|0.5em}}">[[File:Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg|72px]]</div> |
|||
'''gay village'''<br /> |
|||
Thank you, colourful [[User:Worm That Turned|WTT graduate]] who likes pink, for quality articles such as [[Citroën C3 Picasso]] and other cars, for projects such as [[Birmingham Gay Village]], for being "constantly dismayed ..." and collecting [[User:Jenova20/Resident Evil Creatures|evil creatures]] with love, for [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Editor_Retention&diff=prev&oldid=571672477 editor retention]- you are an [[User:Gerda Arendt/PumpkinSky Prize|awesome Wikipedian]]! |
|||
--[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 09:37, 14 September 2013 (UTC) |
|||
</div></div> |
Revision as of 09:37, 14 September 2013
|
||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Concensus
You wrote "Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus." See here:WP is NOT a democracy. Consensus is not required. We editors are pretty much free to edit as we wish and see the need. We do not have to agree with mergers et al. Have a great day.--Degen Earthfast (talk) 22:20, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
- Since you don't appear to have, i'll read what you just quoted to me.
- "Wikipedia is not an experiment in democracy or any other political system. Its primary (though not exclusive) means of decision making and conflict resolution is editing and discussion leading to consensus".
- That's WP is NOT a democracy for you.
- Now on the reason i templated you, that article you unmerged is a rebadged Fiat Ducato as is the Peugeot Boxer. In this situation the articles are merged to avoid 3 identical articles, just as the Eurovans and countless other vehicles (Berlingo and Partner are another example).
- So please familiarise yourself with a few of our basic policies on those templates, it's definitely useful to know.
- Thanks and have a nice day ツ Jenova20 (email) 08:26, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Re: Infobox engines appear duplicated
Hi. I removed them from the infobox, in order for the template to have a similar layout to the Infobox automobile template documentation, which does not recommend including valve numbers, power levels or commercial designations of the engines there. (Also the letter "L", instead of "-litre".) It's true that it now shows the three diesel engines with the same description and, following the same conventions, it should be corrected to display only one. The more detailed information about the engines is found in the engines section, located a little below within the article, which can easily be accessed from the table of contents. I think that all the infoboxes should generally use the same layout and the reference for that is the template documentation. Regards, BaboneCar (talk) 11:08, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- The L- thing instead of Litre was a recommendation from one of the Peer Reviews. I've had about two of them and there is links to them on the talk page of the article. I've used multiple articles to craft the infobox, which is probably where the differences have come from. Thanks ツ Jenova20 (email) 11:34, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Your userboxen confuse me
You are economically left, socially libertarian, anti-religion... and support the Tories???? --Orange Mike | Talk 18:16, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- They made the best case economically and logically at the last election so yeah, and I'm happy with the changes on the whole. Why vote Labour who refused me the right to get married and don't know how to run an economy? The Conservatives can do both and David Cameron is dragging the neanderthals in the party out of the last century. I suppose the only other option was the Lib Dems who want to give an amnesty to possibly a few million illegal immigrants. Lunatics.
- I'm not a die hard supporter, I'll decide on the basis of who makes the best case on the way to election time. So far Labour are making spending commitments they can't afford (again) and refusing an EU referendum (as are the Lib Dems), so it looks like I'll be rewarding David Cameron and his equal marriage bill with my vote in 2 years.
- Sorry about the wall of text ツ Jenova20 (email) 19:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
File:Doctor Who Nightmare In Silver title card.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Doctor Who Nightmare In Silver title card.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:50, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
RFC on LGBT rights in Africa
Some time ago you participated in a dispute resolution discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 53#LGBT rights. I have just opened an RFC on the same content issues at Talk:LGBT rights under international law#Duplicated text on countries' obligations under international law. —Psychonaut (talk) 12:30, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Coalition for Marriage edits
Hi,
You really need to take a step back from the C4M page, as it is clear that your edits are not independent and that you have a vested interest against said topic. We should be seeking to include all encyclopaedic content and so your deletions of good edits which provide more information and are properly referenced need to stop - otherwise this platform is not providing objective and correct information - its one core aim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RackinRibs (talk • contribs) 16:00, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
- Where to start?
- First things first, if i see another threat on my talk page from you I will attempt to have you blocked.
- Secondly you should to type "~~~~" at the end of a message to sign your name.
- Now, if you read the article history you will see that i added the majority of that referenced information and have attempted to stop others deleting it on many occasions, including the most recent.
- Read WP:AGF and WP:Personal Attack, which you have failed to adhere to in that message above.
- You do not own the article. just as i do not. Disputes are better solved through a consensus and i found your recent edit to be highly controversial. Such a thing is allowed on Wikipedia and not solved by threatening another editor, but instead by discussion.
There was no threat in my message. Just a request that you allow information that you might disagree with. Many thanks for accepting revisions. I'm sure we can work together to improve the page in the long term. RackinRibs (talk) 16:44, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
C4M
You shouldn't threaten me with a block. I made two correct edits. Cranmer's blog is not a criticism of C4M so is not relevant. And those polls do not show clear support for same-sex marriage, but more slim support or a split as I added. Your edits are obviously biased. Please remember this is an encyclopaedic entry. Crayfishvictoria (talk) 15:51, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
- You are currently attempting to edit war over your removal of content. I did not place that section under the criticism header but did revert your blatant deletion of it. If you wish to reclarify the poll results as different from what the citations say then please provide a reference. Your opinion does not count as factual evidence. Thanks ツ Jenova20 (email) 15:53, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
The poll provides evidence of slim support, not clear support as you added. Crayfishvictoria (talk) 15:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
- 54 versus 45 is not a "clear split" as you wrote, it is a majority, slim or not, and in some polls quite big. The old wording of "general support" is still accurate in respect to this. The references are pretty clear on this so please revert yourself and restore the paragraph you deleted. You have created WP:Original Research and the sources do not support your wording change which is clearly biased. Thanks ツ Jenova20 (email)
August 2013
Your recent editing history at Coalition for Marriage shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Alexf(talk) 12:47, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Futurama Friend!
I remember you gave me a (V)(;,,;)(V)... wouldn't you have a Bender over there? Can you teach me how to do it? Also, when I visit Old Havana I am planning to take a picture of a graffiti of the best robot ever ( which is Bender of course), and add it to his article. Thanks in advance! Miss Bono [zootalk] 14:27, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hey @Miss Bono:, that's my Bender =P
- If you do take a photo of the Bender graffiti then let me know so i can see it as i'd be very interested.
- Thanks and have a nice day ツ Jenova20 (email) 14:36, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hehehe nice joke :P. I will let you know as soon as I have taken the picture :D. So I guess you don't have a funny Bender made with symbols? Don't worry, it's ok! See you around :D
PS:By the way, I've just finished to watch 6th Season. And... I love The Simpsons too!! Miss Bono [zootalk] 14:42, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Precious
gay village
Thank you, colourful WTT graduate who likes pink, for quality articles such as Citroën C3 Picasso and other cars, for projects such as Birmingham Gay Village, for being "constantly dismayed ..." and collecting evil creatures with love, for editor retention- you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:37, 14 September 2013 (UTC)