rmv, we don't need pile-on final warnings. Adequate notices already left and user being discussed at ANI. |
m →AN/I notice: direct link to section |
||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
== AN/I notice == |
== AN/I notice == |
||
{{ANI-notice}} [[User:Nsk92|Nsk92]] ([[User talk:Nsk92|talk]]) 16:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC) |
{{ANI-notice|Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Persistent_disruptions_by_User:JeanLatore}} [[User:Nsk92|Nsk92]] ([[User talk:Nsk92|talk]]) 16:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:45, 6 July 2008
Your question
Of course I do! :-D --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 13:44, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hahaha, it's too late now, I withdrew my nomination. Maybe I can get your vote next time around, that is if you're not baked enough to remember. By the way, I like your user page. LOL. --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 23:16, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Your recent comment
Your recent comment on Talk:The Bill Engvall Show was completely out of line. The talk pages are for discussing the articles, not the subjects of the articles. The talk pages certainly aren't for posting lewd comments. Chicken Wing (talk) 03:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Admin
I have no particular motivation to try and become one. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 17:04, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Bring em on
A tag has been placed on Bring em on, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Adolphus79 (talk) 03:40, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Bring em on
An article that you have been involved in editing, Bring em on, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bring em on. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Adolphus79 (talk) 04:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC) on their talk page(s).
Admin
Hi, I've replied on my talk page. Thanks again. --SesquipedalianVerbiage (talk) 08:13, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of OMGLOL!
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article OMGLOL!, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CultureDrone (talk) 18:06, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
epic fail
I sucked cambridge's ballz all night.
Have a good day.--68.248.74.14 (talk) 04:58, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sorry you considered my removal of this inappropriate: this vandal had posted the exact same message on over a dozen other pages, and I just went through his contributions and reverted them all. I'll try to remember to leave yours alone should the situation arise later.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, it has been so far. You too!--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of OMGLOL!
I have nominated OMGLOL!, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OMGLOL!. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ptcamn (talk) 18:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
JeanLatore, you could have perhaps saved time by providing some evidence that this term means what you say, rather than simply removing the prod for no legitimate reason. This is not the first time you've done things that give the appearance of being solely time-wasters. I don't know what your actual intent is, but please do not waste other editors' time. Friday (talk) 18:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Re:Oh hey!
It's a pleasure to meet you, JeanLatore. As for your offer to nominate me for admin, I gratefully accept, as long as you're certain I would make a good admin. Thank you for your offer, I appreciate it. Red Phoenix flame of life...protector of all... 01:02, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Wow, you've really done your homework. Thank you so much for your consideration. Red Phoenix flame of life...protector of all... 01:06, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. Though you do know you're overstating the GA-FA thing in the nomination speech, right? I've only written two GAs and one FL, that doesn't seem like that much to me. Red Phoenix flame of life...protector of all... 01:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Working on it right now, thanks. I'll let you know when I have it done and posted up. Red Phoenix flame of life...protector of all... 01:27, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- I finished filling out the RFA and it should be up now. Thanks again for the nomination. Red Phoenix flame of life...protector of all... 01:54, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Working on it right now, thanks. I'll let you know when I have it done and posted up. Red Phoenix flame of life...protector of all... 01:27, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. Though you do know you're overstating the GA-FA thing in the nomination speech, right? I've only written two GAs and one FL, that doesn't seem like that much to me. Red Phoenix flame of life...protector of all... 01:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Per the general agreement there, please do not nominate users for adminship until you have resolved the issues raised there. You're harming candidates. —Giggy 02:42, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, Jean, I don't have time right now, I've got to leave in about five minutes. Maybe tomorrow morning. Red Phoenix flame of life...protector of all... 03:00, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Your RFA
You RFA seems like vandalism. I suggest you withdraw. America69 (talk) 03:26, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Your RFA was closed sorry. America69 (talk) 03:29, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Lets get three things straight. First, I was not the one who called you a troll, that was User:Xenocidic an admin. Second, sorry about my spelling. And third, I did not close your RFA. I was just informing you. Please lets look at the facts from your RFA. Thank you for your concerns in helping Wikipedia. America69 (talk) 03:35, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry Jean, but that was really uncalled for. There is a broad line between wiki-humour and WP:POINTINESS, and even if that request truly was made in good faith, you would surely be opposed strongly due to the recent untruthful nomination of Phoenix. Please stop disruptively editing. Cheers, --Mizu onna sango15/Discuss 03:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC).
- (ecs x2) To be clear, I told him to "Stop trolling". Jean, some of the things you wrote on America69's talk page are borderline incivil. (Yes, I know incivil isn't really a word, but I like it better than uncivil). Anyhow, everyone is free to have a laugh once in a while, but please don't use WP:RFA as your venue for that. –xenocidic (talk) 03:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Something is not right...
Jean, your nominations are being judged against the nominee. I disagree with this. People are too busy looking at the person nominating rather than the person. While I wouldn't suggest you nominate more random people you are very funny at the introductions you put, haha. People on here are too up tight sometimes and need to relax, talk about model citizens. --Eric (mailbox) 13:42, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- Eric, the nomination was blatant libel, that was the problem. RfA is not meant to be a laugh and a joke. If an RfA fails you have to wait ages before running again. A libellious nom is never going to reflect kindly on anyone. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 14:03, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
- I understand that, but why put judgement toward Red? If you see the nom. it was closed basically before it even started. I would never pass judement from one editor to another. I agree with the out of nowhere, nonsensed nominations but I wouldn't count this toward the nominee. Just my opinion. --Eric (mailbox) 14:11, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Enough is enough
This is a final warning. If I see you harassing other users, trolling AfD discussions or making "joke" posts at WP:RFA again, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a chatroom. – ırıdescent 14:08, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
AN/I notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic [[:]]. Thank you. Nsk92 (talk) 16:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC)