Legolas2186 (talk | contribs) →Good faith: drop accusing others of not assuming good faith |
Petergriffin9901 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
[[User:Frcm1988|Frcm1988]] ([[User talk:Frcm1988|talk]]) 14:29, 24 August 2010 (UTC) |
[[User:Frcm1988|Frcm1988]] ([[User talk:Frcm1988|talk]]) 14:29, 24 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
:Jamie, in the politest way possible, drop this AGF vendetta against other users. All of them are experienced in this matter and I have yet to see any instance of a single editor—involved in the discussion—to be rude or acting in bad faith. The evidences are in front of everybody's eyes. People cannot act contrary to this. Whatever may be the previous history between Max24 and PeterGriffin, the main discussion shouldnot deviate from it. — <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 06:35, 25 August 2010 (UTC) |
:Jamie, in the politest way possible, drop this AGF vendetta against other users. All of them are experienced in this matter and I have yet to see any instance of a single editor—involved in the discussion—to be rude or acting in bad faith. The evidences are in front of everybody's eyes. People cannot act contrary to this. Whatever may be the previous history between Max24 and PeterGriffin, the main discussion shouldnot deviate from it. — <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 06:35, 25 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
::Oh God, you guys seriously need to move on or find new articles to edit, because your getting quite repetitive. Jamie understands the situation a little better than you because he has "worked" with Max24 before, and knows the routine. I already explained, but I'll say it again, Max24 takes edits out of context (4 months old), things that could be resolved in between editors and makes them into large scale article talk page problems. It happens to be I cannot answer for edits 4 months ago, thats something you need to get through your head. Secondly, when I fix something, it also has to be for a "negative" reason, either way there is no winning with Max, and Jamie knows that, because he's had to deal with him. Jamie also knows the extent of my help and work on Wikipedia, and knows all the good and help I've done, so he puts that into consideration as well (something you unfortunately fail to do). One more thing, you coming here trying to convince an editor to believe in something else, with these crappy logics is harassment. Because he doesn't think in the "close minded" way you do, that means he's wrong? Or that he needs your guidance? or you to try and deviate his thinking? Jamie knows what he's doing and has been here long enough to know, without the necessity of you two negative and hatefful editors.--[[User:Petergriffin9901|<font color="black" face="Lucida Calligraphy">'''Peter'''</font><font color ="purple" face= "Lucida Calligraphy">'''''Griffin'''''</font>]] • [[User talk:Petergriffin9901|<font face="Garamond">Talk</font>]] 06:44, 25 August 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:44, 25 August 2010
Archive 1: Prior • |
Hellcats
Hello. Yes, her salary is mentioned in the article. She is the last on in the Drama listing. :) Decodet (talk) 23:44, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Did you catch her on there? I missed it and will have to see a rerun or watch it online somewhere. Flyer22 (talk) 17:08, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Mariah Carey (album)
Hey Jamie, so Ive heavily edited and fixed up this article, trying to get it to GA level. I was wondering if you could take a look and tell me what you think. Here is what the article looked like before I started. And this is what is looks like now. As you can see I reconstructed the whole page and its references, as long probably quadrupled its length and information. Look it through if you can, and tell me if there is anything you find poor, not needed, needed or any concerns. Thanks!--PeterGriffin • Talk 12:47, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- Lol, thanks Jamie, I worked really hard into recuntructing the whole page and kind of making it again from scratch. I already nominated it, lets hope it passes :D.--PeterGriffin • Talk 13:23, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- Lol, Thats the plan! Im gonna try and do them in oder, but there are some I would like to do sooner than others.lol. The ones Im excited for are "Music Box," "Merry Christmas," "Daydream," and "Butterfly." Im DREADING "Emotions," "Glitter," and "Charmbracelet." The rest Im ok with, haha, your gonna see how awesome Im gonna make Music Box :p--PeterGriffin • Talk 14:29, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- Yup, Im actually really surprised as to how nicely the first one turned out. I just thought it was time, it was kind of embarrassing how poor her pages were! Ill have you review them as I go, tell me what you think! :)--PeterGriffin • Talk 14:59, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- Yuppp!!! Im really psyched, and surprised! I actually have a goal to make Butterfly FA, Id love to see that happen! and Music Box :D. Thanks Jamie, Im gonna try to make her discographies FL too! :D--PeterGriffin • Talk 19:36, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
FA is "Featured Article" that the best article Wikipedia can produce. FL is "Featured List" for discographies, its like the advanced level. Theres List and Featured List. Her discographies are just List for now..:)--PeterGriffin • Talk 20:32, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- I know! its true, it always looked the crappiest on Wikipedia :/. But since its her most personal and transformed album, I feel theres so much to do with it, it can really be one hell of an article! :)--PeterGriffin • Talk 20:37, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Archiving
Hey :). Sure thing! If you don't it will wind up piling up hahah. Thanks! :D--PeterGriffin • Talk 03:28, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Mariah Carey albums discography
Please leave your comment HERE. Baratayuda (talk) 07:33, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Invitation to discussion: Cert columns headings & links
Hi, Jamie. I'm hoping to get a little wider discussion going that what I've had so far, as I try to determine consensus for (or against) a change of headings and links in music-related articles. The guidelines at MOS:DISCOG are used by many editors whether working on a pure discography, an artist article with a discography inside it, a Featured List review, etc. I'd feel better about moving ahead (or not moving ahead) with the change if I knew how much (or little) support there is for it among more of the music-focused editors.
It's a teeny matter, but if you find you have the time and interest I'd appreciate it if you would weigh in at the Certifications column heading links discussion at MOS:DISCOG. Thanks, — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 15:40, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello
a new month a new piece of Mimi speculation. Parishilton and several other celebrity bloggers are now reporting that Mimi will release her Christmas Album on November 2, 2010. (it puts her up against Keyshia Cole, Nicki Minaj, Susan Boyle and Kelly Rowland who're all releasing around that time if release schedules are correct) -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 (talk2me) 19:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- (if you're worried about the singles template in the infobox don't worry. Some users were doing some tests. They should have been restored by now and no longer show in italics). I don't know if the world is ready for another Xmas album but so long as its not all covers and there's nothing experimental I expect it might do well. it will probably steamroller over Kelly Rowland in the US which is a completely and utter shame. I think a new nice urban-r&B-pop-ballad for christmas would be good from mimi. here's fingers crossed and hoping for the best. Btw did you get you're AS/ALevel results today? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 (talk2me) 23:01, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- I completely agree! And yes I did, I got a U :(. No idea what I'm going to do now! Jayy008 (talk) 00:16, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- PS, I'm tempted to buy both versions of Kelly R. I like both her styles and it's not fair we're only getting a dance album. Jayy008 (talk) 14:29, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- yeah I totally agree. its wrong that the fans are going to get divided and that we're all bounded in dance genre just cause we're in the UK. What she should do is to release a deluxe version of the album (in the UK the bonus disc includes the R&B/pop songs and in the US it features the dance songs).
- omg I'm so sorry to hear about your results. Sometimes things don't work out as planned. Keep you're head up though. You seem like a smart guy I'm sure you'll figure something out... :) -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 (talk2me) 17:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the vote of confidence :). Yeah, I'm just going to give other options a think. Jayy008 (talk) 19:21, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- I completely agree! And yes I did, I got a U :(. No idea what I'm going to do now! Jayy008 (talk) 00:16, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Seperate request
Just wondered if you could do me a little favour? From Sunday 22 August - Wednesday 25 August I'm on vacation. It would be brilliant if you coule 'stalk' my take page and deal with anything urgent if it comes up? Thank you. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 (talk2me) 18:17, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Mariah Carey singles
Hey Jay, I have no idea. I didn't change them or re-format them, they no-joke just changed. On Daydream its the same thing, yet haven't edited it in over 4 days. I don't know, but its weird. By the way, I'm really excited for the new holiday album, I'm sure it will do really well!--PeterGriffin • Talk 22:44, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- Number 7!?!Jamie, your scaring me, LOL. Let me just tell you my logic as to why I think it will be a success. For some odd reason, last year Andrea Bocelli's holiday album experienced big success. I mean it was certified double platinum and sold like 4-5 million copies. Now this is Bocelli's first holiday album, he didn't promote it allot and he isn't as popular. I guess the world has a soft spot for holiday albums, even in this crappy market. So I think, especially with Mariah's known success with "AIWFCIY" the album could be a big hit, with people remembering the "old style Mariah." I mean according to Billboard, Mariah's first holiday album sold over 2.5 million copies in Japan and was the second best-selling foreign album ever (behind #1's). SO hopefull it will remind Japanese fans of Mariah and make it a hit. These are my estimations, I hope Im right.lol. BW did you see the pics of Mariah in Brazil? shes performing a stadium show there. She is HUGE, lol, if she isn't pregnant, then Nick better lock the pantry :)--PeterGriffin • Talk 23:01, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- Well everyone has haters, but Mariah is very popular, its just her recent work that isn't :/. The more popular you are, the more hated as well; Look at Britney Spears and Madonna, I dont think the hate gets bigger, but so doesn't the popularity, see my point.:D Also, yes she is performing a sold-out show at the 60,000 seat Barretos stadium in Brazil. Yes they are on MariahDaily, and she is massive, lol, I dont know, I dont think Ive ever seen her this heavy, maybe she really is pregnant. Anyway though, hope the audio or video files from the concert get released, because she asked fans on her twitter to make "special song requests" so hopefully we get to hear some older and rarer stuff :).--PeterGriffin • Talk 23:35, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Mimi
Hahahahah, yupp, I told you :/ Who even knows, its fishy though!--PeterGriffin • Talk 04:30, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
- Check out this pretty clear video of "Ill Be There," its sooo good, better than 2005. Im really impressed with these vocals, check it out.--PeterGriffin • Talk 00:44, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Re: Naming
I'm sure you'd know better than I would. I simply didn't see a source for that "Silver" naming, so I figured that calling her by her full name was most encyclopedic. Still, I imagine you and the others can make the best choice with this naming thing -- I'm semi-retired. :) Also, I recently undid some nonsense by the troll who seems to like reverting articles to their older versions. My advice with this person: keep cool, but keep an eye out. -- James26 (talk) 15:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for working on the articles for Vampire Diaries. I took the initiative and placed both The Vampire Diaries (season 1) and The Vampire Diaries (season 2) in article incubators (located here and here) in order to allow more information to be added and the article expanded before it is placed in its proper "namespace" (not sure if thats a correct term or not, but I think you get what I mean). To find more information on incuators, just go here. Thanks for your work, and happy editing! ChaosMasterChat 23:28, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- By the way, may I ask if you know anything about where the production code came from? It is not sourced at all, and when I looked on The Futon Critic (the place where Smallville is usually sourced), there seems to be no prod. code. ChaosMasterChat 01:17, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
- No idea, I never usually add the prod code to anything. I don't see it as relevant information. And yes, I get what you mean, but I disagree, having it in the namespace allows other editors to contribute, I can't do all the work myself. By the way most TV articles have around the same information. Smallville is the only one I can find that has major information. It should be discussed wether to have it in an incubator or not. Jayy008 (talk) 12:49, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
- Then if you feel it can be removed, I'll go ahead and do so. Also, what I recomend for the episode lists is to post on the WikiProject Television Talk Page asking anyone to contibute to the incubators. Now, it wont guarentee that there will be a swarm of editors willing to edit the aritcles, but at least some attention will be set on it. I honestly don't think a discussion would solve anything; the articles didn't provide anything "new" other than what was explained in the episode list and the main article about the show. I would think that it would end up being agreed upon to merge the article in those pages. Instead, I went ahead and created the incubators so if you, or anyone else, wanted to add information, you could. If, though, you don't want the incubator, you can creat a sandbox for each season and work on them there (also promoting those on the Project talk page), but I don't think that would be necessary. ChaosMasterChat 22:24, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
- Go ahead, I don't think people really care about coming to Wikipedia and viewing a prod code. And okay, good idea for posting there! Jayy008 (talk) 12:18, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Mimi and Music Box
Hi Jamie. Check out this pretty clear video of "Ill Be There," its sooo good, better than 2005. Im really impressed with these vocals, check it out. Also, I'm actually almost done with "Music Box," just have to finish 2 section, and I think its even better than the last one! :)--PeterGriffin • Talk 15:39, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, well I made it to the right for the reader to more easily differentiate in between sales and certifications. Actually I never heard of Robert Christgua, but now that you mention it, I've checked add I would surely add him. I added as much negative or mixed info as I could find, such as Entertainment Weekly and such. TELL ME ABOUT IT! lol, seriously its getting so annoying, for every little thing I'm being stalked by Max; obviously Celine needs to come out with a new album soon, because he is getting wayy to bored. LOL. Thanks for the support by the way! I appreciate having a friend on Wikipedia!:)--PeterGriffin • Talk 16:50, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:VampireDiaries.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:VampireDiaries.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:18, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Good faith
Please read the second section About good faith:
This guideline does not require that editors continue to assume good faith in the presence of contrary evidence. Assuming good faith does not prohibit discussion and criticism, but instead editors should not attribute the actions being criticised to malice unless there is specific evidence of malice.
Frcm1988 (talk) 14:29, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Jamie, in the politest way possible, drop this AGF vendetta against other users. All of them are experienced in this matter and I have yet to see any instance of a single editor—involved in the discussion—to be rude or acting in bad faith. The evidences are in front of everybody's eyes. People cannot act contrary to this. Whatever may be the previous history between Max24 and PeterGriffin, the main discussion shouldnot deviate from it. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:35, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oh God, you guys seriously need to move on or find new articles to edit, because your getting quite repetitive. Jamie understands the situation a little better than you because he has "worked" with Max24 before, and knows the routine. I already explained, but I'll say it again, Max24 takes edits out of context (4 months old), things that could be resolved in between editors and makes them into large scale article talk page problems. It happens to be I cannot answer for edits 4 months ago, thats something you need to get through your head. Secondly, when I fix something, it also has to be for a "negative" reason, either way there is no winning with Max, and Jamie knows that, because he's had to deal with him. Jamie also knows the extent of my help and work on Wikipedia, and knows all the good and help I've done, so he puts that into consideration as well (something you unfortunately fail to do). One more thing, you coming here trying to convince an editor to believe in something else, with these crappy logics is harassment. Because he doesn't think in the "close minded" way you do, that means he's wrong? Or that he needs your guidance? or you to try and deviate his thinking? Jamie knows what he's doing and has been here long enough to know, without the necessity of you two negative and hatefful editors.--PeterGriffin • Talk 06:44, 25 August 2010 (UTC)