Jayabalan.joseph (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 164: | Line 164: | ||
You have Successfully publicized your ignorance (foolishness) in the Teahouse...! |
You have Successfully publicized your ignorance (foolishness) in the Teahouse...! |
||
:Please cease your unwarranted personal attacks on {{u|NeilN}} and other editors. Continuing that disruptive behavior will lead to a longer block. [[User:Cullen328|<b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:#00F">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 02:59, 17 April 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:00, 17 April 2017
i don't care about anything else anymore , they re more smart and more experience than me, they re powerfull, and not good for me, i just need help to teach me how to behave to save and more money only180.245.83.217 (talk) 19:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 26)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jayabalan.joseph/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! Jayabalan.joseph,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 22:07, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
|
AfC notification: Draft:Species Branding Hypothesis has a new comment
Request for Reviews....
Hello all,
I have made a wiki draft on 'Species Branding': https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Species_Branding_Hypothesis ...This wiki could help find solution to the long running "Species Problem" of Biology... I will be happy to have Experts in the field Review my Draft...
Thank you, Joseph J PhD. Jayabalan.joseph (talk) 17:39, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Jayabalan.joseph, you are a very new editor at Wikipedia, and I noticed that the draft article you've been working on has not yet met the standards at Articles for Creation. Today, you opened a Good Article review for Hybrid (biology). Given that the Good Article process is for articles that meet specific criteria that are much more rigorous than those for draft articles, I don't see how you could yet have the understanding and experience to tackle a Good Article review. In addition, the review page you created contains all sorts of odd links that do not belong.
My suggestion is that until you have gained a great deal more experience at Wikipedia, especially with regard to the standards for articles, that you not attempt any further GA reviews; I would recommend at least a few months and a thousand edits as a minimum, but even better, that one of your own articles be reviewed at GAN once you've revised it to meet the GA criteria.
I will be arranging to have the GA review that you opened deleted, given its issues and your inexperience. I think this is the best thing to do for everyone involved, both yourself and the article's nominator. Thank you for your understanding. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:43, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, BlueMoonset. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:12, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:27, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Further to what the bot says, if you're trying to add something to Wikipedia:WikiProject Biology, please (please) don't add multiple sections to all manner of talk pages, it really isn't at all appreciated. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:42, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:47, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank you Editors...
I am very thankful to everyone who have responded to my request and have contributed valuble edits to the draft.
Best regards, Joseph. 18:59, 3 April 2017 (UTC) Jayabalan.joseph (talk) 18:59, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Species Branding Hypothesis has a new comment
AfC notification: Draft:Species Branding Hypothesis has a new comment
Thank you Robert McClenon
Many thanks Robert McClenon for your valuble comments and suggestions. I had made changes to the Summary just as you had suggested.
>> Focus both on what other biologists, not the originator of the theory, have commented on the plausibility of the theory, and on what other biologists have said about the impact of the theory, if true.
So far I have heared No negative comments or opposition to the hypothesis from others. I would be very happy to hear from other biologist about their views and comments on the hypothesis.
It's my feeling that since this hypothesis deals with a bit complex soultion as against an easy solution; other scientists may not so openly voice comments. Surprisingly I have received just few feed backs, as against the thousands of copies of my books that were downloaded. I also see (on amazon kdp) that many readers finish reading my books till the end. But it could be that the problem (species problem) and its solution (Species Branding hypothesis); are too complex (cognitively demanding) for most readers to arrive with a their personal opinions.
I hope I would recieve more feed backs if the wiki-draft gets published. Thank you again, Joseph
PS: The articles below could give you some sense of the cognitive Complexity of the Species Problem: http://cogprints.org/9956/1/Bartlett_The%20Species%20Problem%20and%20Its%20Logic.pdf http://www.reed.edu/biology/professors/srenn/pages/teaching/2007_syllabus/2007_readings/a4_Hey_2001.pdf
Jayabalan.joseph (talk) 09:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Draft:Species Branding Hypothesis
Draft:Species Branding Hypothesis, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Species Branding Hypothesis and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Species Branding Hypothesis during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 22:06, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Species Branding Hypothesis (April 16)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Species Branding Hypothesis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
April 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Draft:Species Branding Hypothesis, you may be blocked from editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:21, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
The Teahouse
Hello Jayabalan.joseph,
Your Teahouse question has been answered at great length and in great detail by several highly experienced editors, who all agree that your hypothesis is not now notable as Wikipedia defines notability and is therefore not eligible for a Wikipedia article at this time. Continuing to argue about the matter after this has been explained to you repeatedly is approaching the realm of disruptive editing. Please stop now. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:57, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- I am reinforcing what Cullen328. Your question has been asked and answered. Failure to drop the stick will result in a block. --NeilN talk to me 02:15, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
In that case it would n't be a failure from my side, but on Your side to defend your views... (& Obviously a clear failure to your community as a whole)
Jayabalan.joseph (talk) 02:23, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
April 2017
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. NeilN talk to me 02:38, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
>>I am reinforcing what Cullen328. Your question has been asked and answered. Failure to drop the stick will result in a block. --NeilN talk to me 02:15, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
>>In that case it would n't be a failure from my side, but on Your side to defend your views... (& Obviously a clear failure to your community as a whole)
You clearly Failed yourself and your community...
Happy Easter NeilN...!
You're confusing the publisher (you) with the seller (Amazon). Amazon would sell my weekly grocery lists if I published them. --NeilN talk to me 02:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse#
>>You're confusing the publisher (you) with the seller (Amazon). Amazon would sell my weekly grocery lists if I published them. --NeilN talk to me 02:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
"Amazon Books" does not publish your Grocery list NeilN (may be you could try if wish to)...
You have Successfully publicized your ignorance (foolishness) in the Teahouse...!
- Please cease your unwarranted personal attacks on NeilN and other editors. Continuing that disruptive behavior will lead to a longer block. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 02:59, 17 April 2017 (UTC)