Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
:Blanking, or stubbing and prodding the stub is not the answer. There was nothing contentious in the article, so [[WP:BLP]] concerns are minimal. I have tried to explain what we need but for some reason I am being ignored. I am looking for sources. – [[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 18:06, 4 February 2010 (UTC) |
:Blanking, or stubbing and prodding the stub is not the answer. There was nothing contentious in the article, so [[WP:BLP]] concerns are minimal. I have tried to explain what we need but for some reason I am being ignored. I am looking for sources. – [[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 18:06, 4 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
Dear Hypocrite: |
|||
Thank you for offering to delete the article about me. As a working writer, the last thing I need ia a page about me with all sorts of notices tagged on it, as if there were something "fishy" about what nyboricua wrote. I thank nyboricua for trying to get a compatriot beetter known on the internet, but this whole affair has been a most disagreeable one and I would rather go unnoticed, as concerns WIKIPEDIA, than have all this doubt cast upon my person. I would honestly appreciate your removing the article about me from WIIPEDIA, and I shall not consult that source any more.[[User:Jaimema|Jaimema]] ([[User talk:Jaimema#top|talk]]) Jaime Martinez Tolentino |
Revision as of 18:23, 4 February 2010
Welcome
Български | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Lietuvių | 한국어 | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Suomi | Svenska | Türkçe | 简体中文 | The main embassy page
|
||
ukexpat (talk) 16:55, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
February 2010
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Jaime Martínez Tolentino, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.Template:Do not delete ukexpat (talk) 16:56, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Please take heed of the COI notice above. I have attempted to tone down the article a little but it still needs a lot of work. I will leave comments on the talk page, but note that "The author himself" is not a reliable source, please see WP:RS. Finally, when you see an "In Use" tag on an article, please do not edit it, otherwise you will cause edit conflicts with the editor who place the tage, in this case me. – ukexpat (talk) 16:59, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Re your message on my talk page, please see above, you are not a reliable source as that term is used on Wikipedia, see WP:RS and moreover you should not be editing an article about yourself. Please use the article's talk page to suggest changes, with sources. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 17:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- The article was created by Nyboricua, so how can you be the source in any case? But UKexpat is right, you should not be the source and you cannot verify it yourself, although you can discuss it on the article's talk page, provide references there, etc. Dougweller (talk) 17:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- I never said that you were the creator of the article, but you do have a conflict of interest so the COI guidelines apply to you. The tags will be removed when the issues are dealt with - they are not a criticism, they are just an indication to readers of the article that there are unresolved issues. Put it this way, would you as a Professor accept a totally unreferenced paper from any of your students? – ukexpat (talk) 17:25, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Please calm down. It is not "aggravation", we are just seeking to ensure that the article complies with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, as we do with any article. You are certainly notable, which is Wikipedia's principal inclusion criterion; we just need some sources in support. For help with how to deal with an article about you please see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Help. – ukexpat (talk) 17:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- I have undone your blanking of the article - you just cannot go around blanking articles, that is vandalism. I still don't understand what the problem is. Is the article factual? If so, great, we just need some sources. If not, tell us how (on the article's talk page) and we will deal with it. Either way we need sources. – ukexpat (talk) 18:02, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:58, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi.
I'm really sorry you are having a hard time with the article about you. I understand you want it deleted. I'm doing everything I can do accomidate you. If you have any further problems, please contact me, and I can try to help you out. If I am unable to have the article deleted, I will tell you other people who might be more helpful that you can contact. I am so sorry for the trouble this has caused you, and hope that it can be resolved quickly. Hipocrite (talk) 18:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
- Blanking, or stubbing and prodding the stub is not the answer. There was nothing contentious in the article, so WP:BLP concerns are minimal. I have tried to explain what we need but for some reason I am being ignored. I am looking for sources. – ukexpat (talk) 18:06, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Dear Hypocrite:
Thank you for offering to delete the article about me. As a working writer, the last thing I need ia a page about me with all sorts of notices tagged on it, as if there were something "fishy" about what nyboricua wrote. I thank nyboricua for trying to get a compatriot beetter known on the internet, but this whole affair has been a most disagreeable one and I would rather go unnoticed, as concerns WIKIPEDIA, than have all this doubt cast upon my person. I would honestly appreciate your removing the article about me from WIIPEDIA, and I shall not consult that source any more.Jaimema (talk) Jaime Martinez Tolentino