Jack forbes (renamed) (talk | contribs) typo |
review denied |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
{{unblock reviewed|I am sure DDstretch is doing his job with the best of intentions (getting rid of sockpuppets). The reason I think this decision is a bit harsh is that DDstretch originally gave me an indef block is because he thought I was trying avoid a blocked user. As I pointed out to him this was not true, he changed the Template and still gave me an indef block. I am ashamed to say I had one drunken night where I gave abuse to fONEZ4MII which I later apologised for and decided to retire due to the disgust I felt for myself. You may wonder why I am contesting this decision, well Jack Forbes is my real name and I feel if I am going to be punished the punishment should fit the crime. If the final decision remains an indef block I will take it on the chin, but I do think it is a little harsh.Thanks.|2=IMO your sockpuppetry infraction in creating [[User:Boilerman]], as confirmed by Checkuser, is not a huge abuse. However, it is part of a pattern of harassment you have been involved in lately, of Fonez4mii. You decided to retire, and I think a block to enforce that is a good idea. So I consider that you are blocked for harassment, not just for sockpuppetry. If you want to actually return to editing, it may be possible, if you make an unblock request and can convince the reviewing admin that you won't return to this kind of behavior. [[User:Mangojuice|Mango]][[Special:Contributions/Mangojuice|<span style="color:orange">'''juice'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mangojuice|talk]]</sup> 17:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)}} |
{{unblock reviewed|I am sure DDstretch is doing his job with the best of intentions (getting rid of sockpuppets). The reason I think this decision is a bit harsh is that DDstretch originally gave me an indef block is because he thought I was trying avoid a blocked user. As I pointed out to him this was not true, he changed the Template and still gave me an indef block. I am ashamed to say I had one drunken night where I gave abuse to fONEZ4MII which I later apologised for and decided to retire due to the disgust I felt for myself. You may wonder why I am contesting this decision, well Jack Forbes is my real name and I feel if I am going to be punished the punishment should fit the crime. If the final decision remains an indef block I will take it on the chin, but I do think it is a little harsh.Thanks.|2=IMO your sockpuppetry infraction in creating [[User:Boilerman]], as confirmed by Checkuser, is not a huge abuse. However, it is part of a pattern of harassment you have been involved in lately, of Fonez4mii. You decided to retire, and I think a block to enforce that is a good idea. So I consider that you are blocked for harassment, not just for sockpuppetry. If you want to actually return to editing, it may be possible, if you make an unblock request and can convince the reviewing admin that you won't return to this kind of behavior. [[User:Mangojuice|Mango]][[Special:Contributions/Mangojuice|<span style="color:orange">'''juice'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mangojuice|talk]]</sup> 17:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)}} |
||
{{unblock|My harassment of Fonez4mii who I considered was a sockpuppet (and was proved right) stemmed from his constant constant accusations of trolling and sockpupperty (which at that time was not true). I eventually went way over the top during one drunken night, and have been feeling ashamed and embarrassed ever since. I'm afraid creating a sockpuppet for the sole purpose of attacking someone I knew was using a sockpuppet belies belief. I have no excuse for doing it, but I can assure you this is not typical of my character. Thanks.}} |
{{unblock reviewed|1=My harassment of Fonez4mii who I considered was a sockpuppet (and was proved right) stemmed from his constant constant accusations of trolling and sockpupperty (which at that time was not true). I eventually went way over the top during one drunken night, and have been feeling ashamed and embarrassed ever since. I'm afraid creating a sockpuppet for the sole purpose of attacking someone I knew was using a sockpuppet belies belief. I have no excuse for doing it, but I can assure you this is not typical of my character. Thanks.|decline=You have yet to provide convincing evidence or demonstrations that you have changed. — [[User:ddstretch|<span style="border:1px solid DarkGreen;padding:1px;"><font style="color:White;background:DarkGreen" size="0"> DDStretch </font></span>]] [[User talk:ddstretch|<font color="DarkGreen" size = "0">(talk)</font>]] 18:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 18:35, 1 July 2008
RETIRED
(edited out an inapprpriate use of Template:Sockblock
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. This sockpuppet block was justified as a result of Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jack Forbes. DDStretch (talk) 15:45, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello DDStretch, could you plese tell me which banned sockpuppet I had. I must confess to being a little confused. If you are going to block me it might as well be for the right reasons. Jack forbes (talk) 15:57, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
I did, and nowhere does it say I have tried to avoid a block by using a sockpuppet. Please tell me which blocked user you are referring to. Thanks. Jack forbes (talk) 16:01, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Ok. My apologies, the wrong template was used. I will remove it and place an accurate one there. The fact is that you have been confirmed to have been using sockpuppets to disrupt articles and article discussions. So, the indefinite block is justified. Additionally, I am mystified why you announce you are retired and yet quite speedily edit this page once the template was there. This suggests you are now editing under a different user name or an anon name. I would like to know which one it is. DDStretch (talk) 16:08, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- I confessed to using a sockpuppet on one drunken night to give abuse to Fonez4mii which I admitted to being wrong and I was not proud of it. When I say I'm retired I mean it, that does not mean I am going to start using sockpuppets, because believe it or not, I don't agree with it. I once made a statement saying sockpuppets should never be allowed back. I still agree with that, I can almost hear you laughing at that, but it's true. I do now and again pop in to see how the case is progressing, I used my real name (mistake) so feel if someone is going to block me it should be for the right reason. I'm also not as bad as you probably think I am, so even though I will never edit an article or it's talk page again I think an indef block is a little harsh. Thanks. Jack forbes (talk) 16:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Jack forbes (renamed) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am sure DDstretch is doing his job with the best of intentions (getting rid of sockpuppets). The reason I think this decision is a bit harsh is that DDstretch originally gave me an indef block is because he thought I was trying avoid a blocked user. As I pointed out to him this was not true, he changed the Template and still gave me an indef block. I am ashamed to say I had one drunken night where I gave abuse to fONEZ4MII which I later apologised for and decided to retire due to the disgust I felt for myself. You may wonder why I am contesting this decision, well Jack Forbes is my real name and I feel if I am going to be punished the punishment should fit the crime. If the final decision remains an indef block I will take it on the chin, but I do think it is a little harsh.Thanks.
Decline reason:
IMO your sockpuppetry infraction in creating User:Boilerman, as confirmed by Checkuser, is not a huge abuse. However, it is part of a pattern of harassment you have been involved in lately, of Fonez4mii. You decided to retire, and I think a block to enforce that is a good idea. So I consider that you are blocked for harassment, not just for sockpuppetry. If you want to actually return to editing, it may be possible, if you make an unblock request and can convince the reviewing admin that you won't return to this kind of behavior. Mangojuicetalk 17:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Jack forbes (renamed) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My harassment of Fonez4mii who I considered was a sockpuppet (and was proved right) stemmed from his constant constant accusations of trolling and sockpupperty (which at that time was not true). I eventually went way over the top during one drunken night, and have been feeling ashamed and embarrassed ever since. I'm afraid creating a sockpuppet for the sole purpose of attacking someone I knew was using a sockpuppet belies belief. I have no excuse for doing it, but I can assure you this is not typical of my character. Thanks.
Decline reason:
You have yet to provide convincing evidence or demonstrations that you have changed. — DDStretch (talk) 18:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.