72.66.18.140 (talk) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 194: | Line 194: | ||
I see that you added addtional information outside the Lola Monoroe disucssion we've been having regarding my recent RFA. According to RFA policies if you've actually ever read it. Edit amount doesn't matter.--[[User:Ronjohn|Ron John]] ([[User talk:Ronjohn|talk]]) 00:31, 24 March 2012 (UTC) People like you make wikipedia unusesful |
I see that you added addtional information outside the Lola Monoroe disucssion we've been having regarding my recent RFA. According to RFA policies if you've actually ever read it. Edit amount doesn't matter.--[[User:Ronjohn|Ron John]] ([[User talk:Ronjohn|talk]]) 00:31, 24 March 2012 (UTC) People like you make wikipedia unusesful |
||
:I simply thought I would point out to you that your RFA is guaranteed to fail, or it would be had you actually managed to make it properly--[[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]] [[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 00:32, 24 March 2012 (UTC) |
:I simply thought I would point out to you that your RFA is guaranteed to fail, or it would be had you actually managed to make it properly--[[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]] [[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 00:32, 24 March 2012 (UTC) |
||
Please refrain from adding your personal opinion from Wikipedia. If my RFA fails let it fail but telling me based on your personal opinion is not needed. If you purposely intervene in my RFA, so that I don't get nominated I will report you.--[[User:Ronjohn|Ron John]] ([[User talk:Ronjohn|talk]]) 00:46, 24 March 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:46, 24 March 2012
The Signpost: 05 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapter-selected Board seats, an invite to the Teahouse, patrol becomes triage, and this week in history
- In the news: Heights reached in search rankings, privacy and mental health info; clouds remain over content policing
- Discussion report: COI and NOTCENSORED: policies under discussion
- WikiProject report: We don't bite: WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
- Featured content: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments announced, one case remains open
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 16:13, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Quadeucing.
Quadeucing is a serious hang signal going around near the local districts, and we've created this Wikipedia Article because it's an easy way to educate the students on what Quadeucing means, and how to Quadeuce. Quadeucing means a symbol of peace, and accepting them into their friendship. Please bring back our page, it really means a lot to us. We're just trying to help educate our classmates. Thank you for reading this.
Ocgraphicsandthings (talk) 03:02, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
- See here, an article about you and your friends making a funny hand symbol is not worthy of an encyclopedia article--Jac16888 Talk 03:14, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
W800
Dear Sir,
As you can see the text you think is 'copyrighted' is NOT copyrighted at all. The text is actually free for distribution or other usage, such as WIKIPEDIA.
You should be more carefull before applying locks and other stuff on wiki-pages! Wiki is not for the single individual to decide which information is useful. This information is VERY useful for a lot of readers AND it is COPYRIGHTED FREE, again! Ask the writer, damned.
Sincerly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.130.14.82 (talk) 15:57, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- For starters, I can see nowhere that verifies the content is free to use. Have you had it verified through WP:OTRS? Second, if even the content is free to use, doesn't mean we want it. Third, edit warring over the content wasn't helping anything. Had you simply bothered to write the relevant information in your own words, there wouldn't be a problem--Jac16888 Talk 16:27, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Sire, I will prove to you that the content is NOT COPYRIGHTED, if I do so, can you please unlock the information.
Secondly: you write: 'doesn't mean we want it', who is we? Do you think you and a copple of friends are Wikipedia? Do you think the philosophy of wikipedia is 'information for everyone' or 'information for a few persons, who think to decide what is useful for lots of viewers? What a wrong attitude you are spreading about this... in my personal humble view... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.130.196.218 (talk) 16:30, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not interested, bear in mind that I have never seen that page before, never interacted with the person who kep removing the content and no interest with the subject, I am entirely neutral. Wikipedia is written by our editors, not copied from other sources. As I have already said, if you make an effort and instead of just being lazy and copying it, not very good attitude in my opinion, you actually write out the content you believe should be added on the talk page in your own words, using the page as a source, then it will probably be added--Jac16888 Talk 16:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Pierina Gilli article
Searcher770 (talk) 18:50, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Jac16888:
Thanks for your constructive comments on my first-ever page: Pierina Gilli.
I am new to all of this stuff (formatting, editing, neutral POV), so please bear with me.
I hope that I am sending this message to you correctly.
Thanks, Searcher770 -- Friday, 9 March 2012 @ 1:48 pm (EST)
Wizenation
Searcher770 (talk) 18:50, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
How can I post about wizenation.com on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_networking_websites?
I have never posted anything on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asimhsiddiqui (talk • contribs) 17:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- o be included on the list they need to have an article, and before you rush off to write one, please note that to have an article they need to be notable, and that notability needs to be verified through the use of multiple reliable 3rd party references. In addition, the content you included on your userpage was blatantly promotional, Wikipedia is not a place for you to advertise--Jac16888 Talk 17:21, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi there. I have reverted your prod again. A myspace page, while not reliable in the sense of notability, is still a reference that a person exist for the sake of referencing BLP. From my experience, using a person's homepage as a reference in such cases is common practice. If you think differently please nominate the article for a full deletion discussion. Cheers, De728631 (talk) 21:59, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but I think you're completely wrong. A myspace is not reliable source, in any way whatsoever, it fits in with an "external link" at best. Please restore the blpprod, if the person is noteworthy then you should be able to find a real source--Jac16888 Talk 22:17, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- It seems we're disagreeing about this. A myspace site is a reliable primary source when it comes to musicians. Notability though is something completely else. The blp prod is solely about verifying any random fact from the article and thus the myspace profile fits that purpose. De728631 (talk) 19:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 March 2012
- Interview: Liaising with the Education Program
- Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters
- Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators
- Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History
- Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case
- Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 11:53, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
MaxAMSC
Like on frwiki, he's abusing his talk page.Jasper Deng (talk) 22:51, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- His trolling further illustrates that he is NOTHERE. Not worth allowing him to use the page anymore.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:19, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
A3
Hi Jac16888, are you sure you meant to delete Krawsa Isua Thusawi Pasarih per A3? I don't speak the relevant language but the article was over 2,000 bytes. ϢereSpielChequers 18:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yup, each little paragraph was just a different bible verse--Jac16888 Talk 19:41, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for the redirect/move help! Capitalismojo (talk) 03:02, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Actually this was precisely backwards. National Republican Trust is the actual name of the organization. There is no such thing as National Repulican Trust Political Action Group. Your help repairing this situation would be appreciated.Capitalismojo (talk) 03:19, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Another user stepped in and resolved the issue. Thanks again. Capitalismojo (talk) 03:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Eduardo Bravo
I am trying to create a page and you are deleting it all the time. I have added the links to the website!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sys772 (talk • contribs) 00:46, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Wolffaced Grindtech
Hey,
Could I please get the page for Wolffaced Grindtech reinstated?
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joker2041 (talk • contribs) 01:49, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Undeletion request for Josep Maria Socías i Humbert
Please reverse your deletion of Josep Maria Socías i Humbert as it was not a valid A2 (machine translation, not a foreign language article). Thanks! VQuakr (talk) 03:25, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of my page.
Dear Jac16888, If you think that the page "Rajshree Nath" is not up to mark, then you may delete it. I will be sure of creating better pages in future. yours sincerely, Varun.i1991 (talk) 06:02, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Rawr
may i ask....whay did you delete my dinosaur page.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam0921 (talk • contribs) 21:20, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Because this is not a playground, because it was unsourced and because it was most likely written as a shout out to your friends--Jac16888 Talk 21:25, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapters Council proposals take form as research applications invited for Wikipedia Academy and HighBeam accounts
- Discussion report: Article Rescue Squadron in need of rescue yet again
- WikiProject report: Lessons from another Wikipedia: Czech WikiProject Protected Areas
- Featured content: Featured content on the upswing!
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence 'review' opened, Article titles at voting
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 13:48, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
maxamsc
um i see that maxamsc has been having trouble and i can find someone to help him, you can unblock him so he can work with max.so i will look for someone.--Walter55090 (talk) 17:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
also, reply on my talk page its here:user talk:walter55090it dosent exist but you can add it.--Walter55090 (talk) 17:13, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry to deprive you of amusement from Walter trying to help MaxAMSC (talk · contribs) but Walter is blocked until he grows up - literally. (Sadly MaxAMSC appears to be already fairly mature in years.) Interesting parallel: Walter had a burst of contacting editors at random. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:43, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
The Voice UK.
As your an adminisrator, could you do a history merge from User:MayhemMario/sandbox:The Voice UK to the main article, The Voice UK. Many thanks, MayhemMario 17:56, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
About article Author’s Certificate
We have known from User:Edcolins you deleted our article “Author’s Certificate” by the following reasons: G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Author%27s+Certificate".
1. Why you have not told us about it?
2. Great Soviet Encyclopaedia (GSE) let to use its articles with activated connection with GSE. Moreover, Copyright http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Author%27s+Certificate" belongs to GSE http://bse.sci-lib.com/article097541.html from 1926. Why the article “Author’s Certificate” was deleted?
3. Why was broken the deleted procedure?
Thanks, Inventcreat (talk) 13:49, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- The fact of the matter is, you copy and pasted the content from another source, even if the content is no longer copyrighted, we still want content that is written by our authors. And the page linked to clearly states "The Great Soviet Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition (1970-1979). © 2010 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved". I recommend you write an article in your userspace (i.e. User:Inventcreat/Author’s Certificate) write it yourself instead of copying it and use multiple references. I would also like to point out to you WP:NOSHARE, and suggest that you get separate accounts immediately --Jac16888 Talk 14:58, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Why is youtube a unreliable source. The source: Amber Rose is on camera clearly stating that Lola Monroe was a stripper. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1Nlt6TQoAw --Ron John (talk) 00:08, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Irrelevant comment on my talk page
I see that you added addtional information outside the Lola Monoroe disucssion we've been having regarding my recent RFA. According to RFA policies if you've actually ever read it. Edit amount doesn't matter.--Ron John (talk) 00:31, 24 March 2012 (UTC) People like you make wikipedia unusesful
- I simply thought I would point out to you that your RFA is guaranteed to fail, or it would be had you actually managed to make it properly--Jac16888 Talk 00:32, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding your personal opinion from Wikipedia. If my RFA fails let it fail but telling me based on your personal opinion is not needed. If you purposely intervene in my RFA, so that I don't get nominated I will report you.--Ron John (talk) 00:46, 24 March 2012 (UTC)