Notification: proposed deletion of FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup qualification (CONCACAF). (TW) |
Reaper Eternal (talk | contribs) →Unblock request: unblocked |
||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
== Unblock request == |
== Unblock request == |
||
{{unblock|I now see how not discussing contributions in a collaborative project, as in Wikipedia, is very disruptive. I will now try to respond to every message on this talk page. Once again, I am sorry that my edits have caused inconvenience to other editors. -- [[User:Jab7842|Jab7842]] ([[User talk:Jab7842#top|talk]]) 19:20, 18 December 2011 (UTC)}} |
{{unblock reviewed|1=I now see how not discussing contributions in a collaborative project, as in Wikipedia, is very disruptive. I will now try to respond to every message on this talk page. Once again, I am sorry that my edits have caused inconvenience to other editors. -- [[User:Jab7842|Jab7842]] ([[User talk:Jab7842#top|talk]]) 19:20, 18 December 2011 (UTC)|accept=Per your assurances in this request and per your response above, I am unblocking you. Please try to keep in mind that this is a collaborative project. Thanks! [[User:Reaper Eternal|Reaper Eternal]] ([[User talk:Reaper Eternal|talk]]) 16:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)}} |
||
:If I were to say that I found your expressed intention of editing a large number of standard templates very alarming, should you become an admin, what would your reaction be? --<font color="Red">[[User:Anthony Bradbury|'''Anthony Bradbury''']]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury|"talk"]]</font></sup> 20:01, 18 December 2011 (UTC) |
:If I were to say that I found your expressed intention of editing a large number of standard templates very alarming, should you become an admin, what would your reaction be? --<font color="Red">[[User:Anthony Bradbury|'''Anthony Bradbury''']]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury|"talk"]]</font></sup> 20:01, 18 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
:I'm happy to see that you will make an effort to respond in future. Perhaps you would like to make a start at [[#You deleting/moving the page I created and changing my user page.]]? — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 23:44, 18 December 2011 (UTC) |
:I'm happy to see that you will make an effort to respond in future. Perhaps you would like to make a start at [[#You deleting/moving the page I created and changing my user page.]]? — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 23:44, 18 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
::{{done}} -- [[User:Jab7842|Jab7842]] ([[User talk:Jab7842#top|talk]]) 00:37, 19 December 2011 (UTC) |
::{{done}} -- [[User:Jab7842|Jab7842]] ([[User talk:Jab7842#top|talk]]) 00:37, 19 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup qualification (CONCACAF)]] == |
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup qualification (CONCACAF)]] == |
||
[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|48px|]] |
[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|48px|]] |
Revision as of 16:36, 20 December 2011
A few protected pages out of many that I, Jab7842, am willing to edit/create/delete if I become an administrator:
Pages to edit:
- Template:Admin
- Template:Admin-abbr
- Template:Current events header
- Template:Disambiguation
- Template:WikiProject Disambiguation
- Template:Db-meta
- Template:AbRep
- Template:AbRep-multi
- Template:AbRep1
- Template:Delete
- Template:Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia:Arbitration
- Template:Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia:Arbitration/doc
- Template:Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia:Abuse response
- Template:Editnotices/Group/Template talk:Editnotices
- Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
- Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/File mover
- Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
- Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Requested moves/Current discussions
- Template:Editnotices/Namespace
- Template:Editnotices/Namespace/Category
- Template:Editnotices/Namespace/Category/doc
- Template:Editnotices/Namespace/File
- Template:Editnotices/Namespace/File/doc
- Template:Editnotices/Namespace/File talk
- Template:Editnotices/Namespace/File talk/doc
- Template:Editnotices/Namespace/Wikipedia talk
- Template:Wikipedia talk navigation
- Template:Editnotices/Notcensored (nudity)
- Template:Editnotices/Notcensored (nudity)/doc
- Template:Di-disputed fair use rationale
- Template:Di-no source
- Template:Di-no license
- Template:Di-no source
- Template:Di-no source no license
- Template:Di-dw no source
- Template:Di-orphaned fair use
- Template:Di-no fair use rationale
- Template:Di-replaceable fair use
- Template:Di-disputed fair use rationale
- Template:Di-no permission
- Template:Di-fails NFCC
Pages to create:
Pages to delete:
You deleting/moving the page I created and changing my user page.
Hi Jab7842.
Regarding your recent deletion of Talk:Prostitution/MsBatfisharticleworkpage and moving its contents to User:MsBatfish/Prostitution:
It would have really been helpful if you had left me a note either on my user talk page or on Talk:Prostitution, as opposed to just moving my Prostitution article workpage without even asking or notifying me and modifying my user page [here]. It would be nice to know why you took it upon yourself to move the workpage, for example. When I created that page, it was my understanding that pages like that are not supposed to exist as user subpages. Specifically that copying an article in it's entirety for the purpose of making draft edits is not supposed to take place in a user subpage but is allowed in an article talk subpage. If you thought that I had misinterpreted that you could have just told me.
Fortunately, however, I was already considering getting the page deleted myself because I haven't really used it as much as I thought it would, as I said on the Prostitution talk page under Talk:Prostitution#Making a new workpage for this article. But I was only at the stage of thinking about deleting it and had also asked if anyone else wanted to use it. I am not sure whether that had anything to do with you moving it or not.
Anyway, some communication abut this would have been nice. -MsBatfish (talk) 07:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have restored the post above because it seems you have deleted it before replying to it. Jab7842: this is a collaborative project. Please do not make any edits if you are not prepared to discuss them. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- I thought it was supposed to be in the user namespace. -- Jab7842 (talk) 00:37, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ok.. well thanks for replying finally. In the future when you are thinking of deleting or moving a page it is good practice to check for any relevant discussions first and, when appropriate, to notify the creator and/or main editors (when applicable). In this case you would have seen a relevant discussion (where that issue was already mentioned) and you could have just added a comment/question there or on my talk page. I notice you want to be an admin, and I think it's extremely important for admins to be able to communicate with other users about things like this. In addition, it's also good practice to include an edit summary to explain your actions, particularly when making major changes. This can also end up saving you time, since people would see an explanation for why you did something and would be less likely to have to ask you why you did it, or to revert it because they didn't understand your reasoning.
- And, at the bare minimum, please respond when someone asks you to explain an edit. Thanks. -MsBatfish (talk) 03:22, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- I thought it was supposed to be in the user namespace. -- Jab7842 (talk) 00:37, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Collaboration
You have again deleted the post above without making any response, as you have done numerous times previously. This suggests to me that you have no desire or ability to collaborate with other editors. In order to emphasise how vital this is in this project, I am blocking your account until you can demonstrate that you understand the concept of discussion and are willing to engage with others. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:59, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Unblock request
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Jab7842 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
If you check the revision history of my talk page you can clearly see that I was performing a test, and removed the comments without noticing. I am deeply sorry if this cost anyone any inconvenience. -- Jab7842 (talk) 14:06, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
To clarify, removing things from your talk page is not the issue, as you're certainly allowed to do that. It's that, when people have brought complaints about your editing to you, you've done only that and nothing more. That's refusal to discuss, which is disruptive and blockable. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:48, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Unfortunately, one needs only to look at the history of your talkpage to see that rather than WP:ARCHIVE, you simply delete when you think you've dealt with it, rather than responding. It's your modus operandi since day 1. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:11, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I admit that that has been my "way of operating," but in this case it was clearly different. -- Jab7842 (talk) 14:18, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Unblock request
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Appointment_green.svg/48px-Appointment_green.svg.png)
Jab7842 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I now see how not discussing contributions in a collaborative project, as in Wikipedia, is very disruptive. I will now try to respond to every message on this talk page. Once again, I am sorry that my edits have caused inconvenience to other editors. -- Jab7842 (talk) 19:20, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Per your assurances in this request and per your response above, I am unblocking you. Please try to keep in mind that this is a collaborative project. Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- If I were to say that I found your expressed intention of editing a large number of standard templates very alarming, should you become an admin, what would your reaction be? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:01, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- I would ask your opinion on what to do. -- Jab7842 (talk) 20:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Then I would say don't do it!--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:59, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- I would ask your opinion on what to do. -- Jab7842 (talk) 20:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'm happy to see that you will make an effort to respond in future. Perhaps you would like to make a start at #You deleting/moving the page I created and changing my user page.? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 23:44, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup qualification (CONCACAF) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of notability. No independent sources at all.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:08, 20 December 2011 (UTC)