Born2cycle (talk | contribs) →Lemonade?: new section |
Kwamikagami (talk | contribs) →BLOCK WARNING: new section |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Want to help [[User:Born2cycle/Status_quo_stonewalling|make some lemonade]] out of the [[WT:AT]] lemons? --[[User:Born2cycle|Born2cycle]] ([[User talk:Born2cycle|talk]]) 03:59, 23 January 2012 (UTC) |
Want to help [[User:Born2cycle/Status_quo_stonewalling|make some lemonade]] out of the [[WT:AT]] lemons? --[[User:Born2cycle|Born2cycle]] ([[User talk:Born2cycle|talk]]) 03:59, 23 January 2012 (UTC) |
||
== BLOCK WARNING == |
|||
You know there is a dispute at [[Wikipedia:Article titles]] and the policy has been twice protected because of edit warring. Now you're starting it up again. If you continue, I will block you. I've been told I can't see the obvious, and that there is a consensus right under my nose. That may well be true, but the solution is to find an uninvolved admin to sort it out. If it's as obvious as people say, that shouldn't be difficult. — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 00:04, 24 January 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:04, 24 January 2012
I like to keep this page clean. If you wish to reply to some one else's message, please consult the page history. JCScaliger
Teika GA
Appreciate another look at Fujiwara no Teika now. --maru (talk) contribs 04:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Knight
Hmmm. I think he's too free with the revert button, but he's correct: the structure of the page, as currently constituted, is a real mess. I'll take a look at it when I can, but I'm rather busy right now. Choess 00:58, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Re Nakhijevan
I don't understand what you're trying to accomplish, are you saying the sources are not good enough so lets just get rid of the whole etymology section? Present an alternative.--Eupator 20:22, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
RfC on Talk:Alexander the Great
Thanks for your comment. I reformulated the RfC slightly; I'm asking whether we should add the Category "Homosexuality in ancient Greece" to the page, and I wasn't sure whether you were in favor or not. Would you care to comment again? Thanks. --Akhilleus (talk) 21:59, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Edit war warning
Per WP:3RR, please stop the revert warring. If there's something you don't like about the references I added, let's talk about that. Removing them with edit summaries like "Restore grammar, accuracy, and academic references" is disingenuous. Dicklyon (talk) 15:30, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- I made a number of repairs to your edits, which now rather than removing the refs you didn't care for most hid and delinked them; don't do that. Also lots of other fixes caused by your careless removal of fixes I had done before. Dicklyon (talk) 07:05, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Undiscussed move of Dunsany
JC, I reverted your undiscussed move of this article on grounds of WP:PRINCIPALNAMINGCRITERIA policy. Please take any further discussion on this proposed move to WP:RM. Thanks --Mike Cline (talk) 02:06, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Remember, whatever your personal reasons are for an article move, it is far more important that the WP community has consensus for it. That's why i beleive the WP:RM process is the best approach. --Mike Cline (talk) 03:44, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Lemonade?
Want to help make some lemonade out of the WT:AT lemons? --Born2cycle (talk) 03:59, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
BLOCK WARNING
You know there is a dispute at Wikipedia:Article titles and the policy has been twice protected because of edit warring. Now you're starting it up again. If you continue, I will block you. I've been told I can't see the obvious, and that there is a consensus right under my nose. That may well be true, but the solution is to find an uninvolved admin to sort it out. If it's as obvious as people say, that shouldn't be difficult. — kwami (talk) 00:04, 24 January 2012 (UTC)