The Banner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' temporarily from editing for [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|abuse of editing privileges]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here Wow I didn't even do anything wrong. I was falsely accused of vandalizing Columbidae when I didn't. There was a rude user called Night of the Big Wind who was being harsh and was telling me to I had to edit Feral Pigeon. I didn't know there was a Feral Pigeon page, and I tried to explain to him that I am still new to editing Wikipedia, and he was acting like I have been editing for years. He also left an edit on my user page calling me an idiot by saying "please turn your F****ng brain on". I find that edit very inpolilite and disrespectful. He should be blocked as well or at least give him a warning notice. ;''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. -- [[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 21:54, 28 May 2011 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' temporarily from editing for [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|abuse of editing privileges]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here Wow I didn't even do anything wrong. I was falsely accused of vandalizing Columbidae when I didn't. There was a rude user called Night of the Big Wind who was being harsh and was telling me to I had to edit Feral Pigeon. I didn't know there was a Feral Pigeon page, and I tried to explain to him that I am still new to editing Wikipedia, and he was acting like I have been editing for years. He also left an edit on my user page calling me an idiot by saying "please turn your F****ng brain on". I find that edit very inpolilite and disrespectful. He should be blocked as well or at least give him a warning notice. ;''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. -- [[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 21:54, 28 May 2011 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
||
:Even so, You have the template with information on your talkpage. I had told you what you were doing wrong and where the information should go. And again you reverted the page. The link to the [[Feral pigeon]] is on the top of the article. May I suggest that the next time you add something and it is reverted by an experienced editor, that you ask that editor on his talkpage '''why''' he has reverted? That saves you a lot of trouble. [[User:Night of the Big Wind|Night of the Big Wind]] ([[User talk:Night of the Big Wind|talk]]) 23:27, 28 May 2011 (UTC) |
:Even so, You have the template with information on your talkpage. I had told you what you were doing wrong and where the information should go. And again you reverted the page. The link to the [[Feral pigeon]] is on the top of the article. May I suggest that the next time you add something and it is reverted by an experienced editor, that you ask that editor on his talkpage '''why''' he has reverted? That saves you a lot of trouble. [[User:Night of the Big Wind|Night of the Big Wind]] ([[User talk:Night of the Big Wind|talk]]) 23:27, 28 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
That doesn't give you the right to insult people calling them stupid, and I don't have the time to look at all of the thousands of rules. |
Revision as of 04:55, 29 May 2011
|
May 2011
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Columbidae. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Columbidae was changed by Icex15 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956147 on 2011-05-26T22:34:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:34, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 01:35, 27 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Columbidae. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 01:40, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Columbidae, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Columbidae was changed by Icex15 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969626 on 2011-05-28T21:03:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:03, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here Wow I didn't even do anything wrong. I was falsely accused of vandalizing Columbidae when I didn't. There was a rude user called Night of the Big Wind who was being harsh and was telling me to I had to edit Feral Pigeon. I didn't know there was a Feral Pigeon page, and I tried to explain to him that I am still new to editing Wikipedia, and he was acting like I have been editing for years. He also left an edit on my user page calling me an idiot by saying "please turn your F****ng brain on". I find that edit very inpolilite and disrespectful. He should be blocked as well or at least give him a warning notice. ;}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:54, 28 May 2011 (UTC)- Even so, You have the template with information on your talkpage. I had told you what you were doing wrong and where the information should go. And again you reverted the page. The link to the Feral pigeon is on the top of the article. May I suggest that the next time you add something and it is reverted by an experienced editor, that you ask that editor on his talkpage why he has reverted? That saves you a lot of trouble. Night of the Big Wind (talk) 23:27, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
That doesn't give you the right to insult people calling them stupid, and I don't have the time to look at all of the thousands of rules.