Hobartimus (talk | contribs) Warning: Personal attack directed at a specific editor on Lajos Kossuth. (TW) |
Iadrian yu (talk | contribs) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
== January 2011 == |
== January 2011 == |
||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|do not attack]] other editors, as you did here: [[:Lajos Kossuth]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:uw-npa3 --> [[User:Hobartimus|Hobartimus]] ([[User talk:Hobartimus|talk]]) 12:47, 20 January 2011 (UTC) |
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|do not attack]] other editors, as you did here: [[:Lajos Kossuth]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:uw-npa3 --> [[User:Hobartimus|Hobartimus]] ([[User talk:Hobartimus|talk]]) 12:47, 20 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
: Please refrain from unsupported accusations. Can you please explain how did I attacked User:Nmate(since he is the only other user here) in this case? [[User:Iadrian yu|Adrian]] ([[User talk:Iadrian yu#top|talk]]) 12:50, 20 January 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::You called, an obviously good faith edit vandalism. Reverts that return to previously long established versions can never be vandalism. [[User:Hobartimus|Hobartimus]] ([[User talk:Hobartimus|talk]]) 12:57, 20 January 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::: Having in mind Nmate`s edit summary, I don`t think that was a good faith edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lajos_Kossuth&action=historysubmit&diff=408955245&oldid=408930605 1]. He didn`t even consult the talk page and without any valid explanation reverted my edits. When an editor always reverts blindly or reverts "just like that", that reverts aren`t in good faith anymore... and in this case clearly against Wiki rules therefore, when an editor know about some rule and still violates it, it can be considered as vandalism. I didn`t intended to offend anybody(If I did I didn`t meant to) but if you feel that I violated [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]] please fell free to file a report. Greetings. [[User:Iadrian yu|Adrian]] ([[User talk:Iadrian yu#top|talk]]) 13:05, 20 January 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:15, 20 January 2011
/Archive April,2010 |
The greatest escape action in the world :-)))
Merry Christmas to everybody !
Merry X-mas :-) to everybody ! Adrian (talk) 06:20, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
Merry X-mas to everybody who celebrates it according to the Julian calendar. Adrian (talk) 13:52, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Why are citations needed on Trinidad and Tobago article?
Just curious why citations are needed for these language-related items... They seem pretty obvious to me! E.g. why do we need a citation to know that Les Coteaux is French, or Auchenskeoch Scottish? In the case of Creole, just look at Trinidadian_Creole_English... Just curious... Jpaulm (talk) 02:51, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hello, no, but I saw tag removal by anonymous user and I thought that some user put tags there to challenge the data ? It was strange to me for someone, especially anonymous user to remove tags with an empty edit summary and provide no references when those are requested. Adrian (talk) 05:54, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello
Thanks for writing in my guest book! If you are interested, you are invited to [[WikiProject Dacia. Regards!--Codrin.B (talk) 18:34, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 21:21, 13 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
If you wish, please provide input. Thanks and best regards. Codrin.B (talk) 21:21, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info, in the next 2-3 days I will study this problems and provide my input. Greetings. Adrian (talk) 21:47, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Irridentist movements in Europe
Hey. You're edit was a bit too much for a page that is not supposed to focus on individual controversies- but feel free to add what you wrote to the Greater Hungary page :)! --Yalens (talk) 19:37, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- Ok. I will see if there is an appropriate place at that article for this info. I will move it now. Greetings. Adrian (talk) 19:39, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Parrot
Cool picture! Is that your parrot? Regards --Codrin.B (talk) 19:58, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- Unfortunately .. not, but I am planing to buy one just like that. That is a picture of a parrot on a terrace, in some city in Australia. Over there, they are like pigeons :). I wish I could live there:)). Adrian (talk) 20:09, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- If you like parrots, take a look at this :) [1]. Adrian (talk) 20:14, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
January 2011
Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: Lajos Kossuth. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hobartimus (talk) 12:47, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Please refrain from unsupported accusations. Can you please explain how did I attacked User:Nmate(since he is the only other user here) in this case? Adrian (talk) 12:50, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- You called, an obviously good faith edit vandalism. Reverts that return to previously long established versions can never be vandalism. Hobartimus (talk) 12:57, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Having in mind Nmate`s edit summary, I don`t think that was a good faith edit 1. He didn`t even consult the talk page and without any valid explanation reverted my edits. When an editor always reverts blindly or reverts "just like that", that reverts aren`t in good faith anymore... and in this case clearly against Wiki rules therefore, when an editor know about some rule and still violates it, it can be considered as vandalism. I didn`t intended to offend anybody(If I did I didn`t meant to) but if you feel that I violated Wikipedia:No personal attacks please fell free to file a report. Greetings. Adrian (talk) 13:05, 20 January 2011 (UTC)