IHateAccounts (talk | contribs) →Tea for you: bleah, creepy Tag: Manual revert |
→Newbie?: new section Tag: 2017 wikitext editor |
||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
I saw your crucial input on the Sidney Powell article and talk page. My news organization is looking to speak with a few Wikipedians anonymously about their thoughts and interpretations on this person for a story that covers current events like this alongside the birthday of Wikipedia and how wikipedians shape the discussion and shed light on the facts. Do you have a few minutes to spare over email to talk about your perspectives? Thanks very much. I look forward to hearing back from you. [[User:Kombucha Morning|Kombucha Morning]] ([[User talk:Kombucha Morning|talk]]) 18:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC) |
I saw your crucial input on the Sidney Powell article and talk page. My news organization is looking to speak with a few Wikipedians anonymously about their thoughts and interpretations on this person for a story that covers current events like this alongside the birthday of Wikipedia and how wikipedians shape the discussion and shed light on the facts. Do you have a few minutes to spare over email to talk about your perspectives? Thanks very much. I look forward to hearing back from you. [[User:Kombucha Morning|Kombucha Morning]] ([[User talk:Kombucha Morning|talk]]) 18:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
== Newbie? == |
|||
Unless I'm mistaken you're a 3 month Newbie with the sophisticated wiki skills to post a warning on my page[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CatCafe&diff=prev&oldid=1000392561] and to lecture other editors. Are you really a newbie? I note that editor MJL is coaching, or "still working on" you as they put it[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AIHateAccounts&type=revision&diff=1000232748&oldid=1000228663] and "setting time aside to talk" to you personally[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AIHateAccounts&type=revision&diff=999787253&oldid=999753506]? Are you being coached by other editors as a puppet? And due to your WP skillset, have you really only been a WP editor for 3 months? [[User:CatCafe|CatCafe]] ([[User talk:CatCafe|talk]]) 22:41, 14 January 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:41, 14 January 2021
|
|
Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, IHateAccounts! Thank you for your contributions. I am Bradv and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. If you wish to contact me on this page, please use {{Ping|Bradv}}
such that I get notified of your request. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- The Teahouse, our help forum for new users
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! – bradv🍁 03:35, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Bradv: ok fine, yes yes. I was bullied into making an account and I finally gave up so here it is. I'm not really feeling social right now and probably going to go to sleep in a short while. IHateAccounts (talk) 03:38, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Important notices
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 - SummerPhDv2.0 04:42, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 - SummerPhDv2.0 04:42, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
I could use one too. GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:28, 21 November 2020 (UTC) |
pronouns
Not sure if you're aware of this, perhaps you find this helpful: In their preferences, Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-personal editors can set a value for "How do you prefer to be described?". For example, my preferred pronoun can be used by including {{pronoun|Vexations}}
which renders as they. There is a list of related templates at {{pronoun}} you may find useful. Vexations (talk) 23:48, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware of it. Thank you! IHateAccounts (talk) 23:50, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
That discussion, we know the one
The goal appears to be exceedingly polite to the point of frustration, and provoke others into incivility. I'd honestly just let it die, and if there are attempts to re-insert without consensus to do so, go from there. ValarianB (talk) 19:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- @ValarianB: Yes, I've pointed out that they're sealioning, per WP:SEALION. Appreciate your thoughts on it! I'm still going to keep an eye on it in case they try to claim that lack of reply means they get to push the BLP-violating material into the page. IHateAccounts (talk) 20:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- @ValarianB: @The Four Deuces: Well... they seem to be violating WP:CANVASS now. [1][2][3] IHateAccounts (talk) 22:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Well then. @GorillaWarfare: could you take a look at the above commenter perhaps? IHateAccounts (talk) 21:55, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Removed the attack and warned. GorillaWarfare (talk) 21:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Retired and vanished. Rather curious situation from beginning to end, this was. ValarianB (talk) 13:24, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- @ValarianB: That is weird. Them asking for a rename hid some of their WP:BLP-violating sandbox pattern stuff from easy view by breaking the links. I've requested this one [4] be speedy deleted under G10, I don't know if there are others. IHateAccounts (talk) 15:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Sidney Powell talk page removals/hatting
Why do you do this: [5] [6] [7]? I don't understand what in that comment has anything to do with what is written at WP:FORUM, and also I don't understand why you take it upon yourself to repeatedly remove/hat it? Does the IP not have a say? Do I not have a say? Are you in charge of who can say what on this talk page? I don't understand your thinking on this. Levivich harass/hound 19:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Levivich: I think IHA got the wrong idea from this hatting I did on Talk:QAnon. I was trying to explain the talk page guidelines to them.
@IHA: It's important that you recognize there are two kinds of roles: editors and admins. Editors contribute to the conversation while Admins (and some non-admins like myself) can close them. Admins are also generally the ones to make rulings on WP:FORUM material (assuming they are not WP:INVOLVED) and remove offending comments. (edit conflict) –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 19:38, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Setting time aside to talk
Just wondering if you were able to do that today or tomorrow? –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 23:34, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Sidney Powell
I saw your crucial input on the Sidney Powell article and talk page. My news organization is looking to speak with a few Wikipedians anonymously about their thoughts and interpretations on this person for a story that covers current events like this alongside the birthday of Wikipedia and how wikipedians shape the discussion and shed light on the facts. Do you have a few minutes to spare over email to talk about your perspectives? Thanks very much. I look forward to hearing back from you. Kombucha Morning (talk) 18:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Newbie?
Unless I'm mistaken you're a 3 month Newbie with the sophisticated wiki skills to post a warning on my page[8] and to lecture other editors. Are you really a newbie? I note that editor MJL is coaching, or "still working on" you as they put it[9] and "setting time aside to talk" to you personally[10]? Are you being coached by other editors as a puppet? And due to your WP skillset, have you really only been a WP editor for 3 months? CatCafe (talk) 22:41, 14 January 2021 (UTC)