Sangdeboeuf (talk | contribs) →Important notice: post-1992 American politics: new section Tag: contentious topics alert |
Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Hodgdon's secret garden/Archive 3) (bot |
||
(61 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
<small>Learn more about [[Wikipedia:New Pages Feed/Help|page curation]].</small> |
<small>Learn more about [[Wikipedia:New Pages Feed/Help|page curation]].</small> |
||
== PROD == |
|||
== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == |
|||
== "Printer's manuscript" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|30px]] |
|||
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect [[:Printer's manuscript]]. The discussion will occur at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 4#Printer's manuscript]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> [[User:Hog Farm|Hog Farm]] <sub> [[User talk:Hog Farm|Talk]]</sub> 05:27, 4 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
==Concern regarding [[Draft:Tara Reade]]== |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, Hodgdon's secret garden. I just wanted to let you know that [[Draft:Tara Reade]], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for [[WP:MAINSPACE|article space]]. |
|||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> |
|||
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under [[WP:G13|CSD G13]]. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. {{#if:||You may request [[WP:USERFY|userfication]] of the content if it meets requirements.}} |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div> |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> |
|||
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2023|2023 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available [[WP:REFUND/G13|here]]. |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> |
|||
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. [[User:Bot0612|Bot0612]] ([[User talk:Bot0612|talk]]) 02:48, 13 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
==Your draft article, [[Draft:Tara Reade]]== |
|||
[[File:Information icon4.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]] |
|||
</div> |
|||
Hello, Hodgdon's secret garden. It has been over six months since you last edited the [[WP:AFC|Articles for Creation]] submission or [[WP:Drafts|Draft]] page you started, "[[Draft:Tara Reade|Tara Reade]]". |
|||
</div> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1187132125 --> |
|||
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia [[WP:mainspace|mainspace]], the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Tara Reade|edit the submission}} and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code. |
|||
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at [[WP:REFUND/G13|this link]]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. |
|||
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! <!-- Template:Db-draft-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:CommanderWaterford|CommanderWaterford]] ([[User talk:CommanderWaterford|talk]]) 16:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Woke == |
|||
Greetings. I am watching the talk page; there's no need to [[WP:PING]] me with every reply. Thanks. —[[User:Sangdeboeuf|Sangdeboeuf]] ([[User talk:Sangdeboeuf|talk]]) 22:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Please only include essential information in your talk page posts. Lengthy messages are difficult to read and risk being misunderstood or ignored; see [[WP:TALK#Good practices for talk pages|Good practices for talk pages]]. Please also avoid copying lengthy primary sources per [[WP:NOFULLTEXT]]. Thank you. —[[User:Sangdeboeuf|Sangdeboeuf]] ([[User talk:Sangdeboeuf|talk]]) 20:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC) |
|||
=== Article ''could'' be tagged — === |
|||
{{Rf|Talk: Woke}} |
|||
... {{[[Template:Unbalanced|Unbalanced]]}}. Not that it will be.</p><p>A contributor couldn't drag nuanced critique of the current tumult for change into our wikiarticle on [[Woke]] to save his or her life: The only content that is allowed must be as completely-slanted pro. Interpreting guidelines in pro hoc fashion to do so. ... ... ... ''Oh no! The word ''woke'' is being used sometimes as a derogatory epithet!'': Aw c'mon; get out of here: This just means that change is being effected! Eg: I'll quote ''Britannica'' on the word: ''hippie.'' {{tq|"The term hippie was soon applied by local journalists to this new subculture, and the word gained national (and soon international) recognition in 1967 thanks in large part to the frequent use of the epithet by San Francisco Chronicle columnist [[Herb Caen]]. The term can be descriptive or derogatory and was not initially used by the youths to describe themselves."}}</p><p>In the sixties, in reality most folks were more conservative than those of its cultural ''avant-garde'', yeah? Yet: ''Who'' represents, in our historical imagination, this decade's cultural impact? Daresay: ''hippies'' – (plus the V-for-victory sign rebranded for "peace"; the Briton Gerald Holtom-invented monogram of /n/ and /d/ for "nuclear disarmament" in semaphore of central vertical for /d/ and downward lines on both sides for /n/]; etc.) Yet, yes, Who'll end up considered avatars for the present decade and its pro-equality effervescence?: the woke!; even so, our wikiarticle oughtn't to be subtly pro nor con this present opinion surge.</p><p>Although I'm subtly thus myself, I still believe that WP actually should bend over backward in service of the elusive quality of neutrality; hence, I'm I'm somebody who really wishes '''[[Wikipedia:Neutrality of sources]]''' were <small>'''THE'''</small> '''''N<sup><u>o</u></sup>''''' <small>'''ONE'''</small> policy and not some mere "essay." ... Barring that, I dig when periodicals simply are up and front about their across-the-board editorial slant: My favorite example of which being reporting in the ''Economist'', whose editorial stance (according to WP, not a reliable source) is supportive of "radical centrism, favouring policies and governments that maintain centrist politics." (Oddly enough – or, not really! – if we look up WP viewership vs. even mag subscription/viewership statistics, they'll see that our own Wiki article is going to get exponentially more page views than anything in even subscription and online viewership of even such an influential a mag as the ''Economist'', articles such as ours on WP win hands down! Even ''more'' of an impetus for super neutrality, IMHO!)</p><p>''Tomorrow's'' – as it's dated! – ''Economist'' "says" (which mag, also, btw, is still un-bylined: so that, it says, its journalists can continue speaking in a collective voice; thus, an expression like "the Economist says" really means just that!) — anyway, tomorrow's ''Economist''[https://www.economist.com/britain/2021/03/27/what-boris-johnson-has-in-common-with-benjamin-disraeli] includes material about the Brits' current premier that's in a tone so refreshingly neither particularly pro nor con! For a subtly "pro" portion thereof, take the piece's 3rd graf, talking about Boris's likenesses to Benjamin Disraeli, reading, {{tq|'''''"Disraeli could never resist the temptation to poke fun at the priggish and pompous, who were hardly in short supply in Victorian England. He mocked his first patron, Peel, for long-windedness ('he traces the steam engine always back to the tea-kettle'), and his great rival, Gladstone, for self-righteousness. Mr Johnson loves taking a pop at neo-Victorians, whether the great and the good spouting platitudes or woke warriors itching to take offence."'''''}}</p><p>Just imagine our WP article's having gumption enough to include a reference, no matter how oblique, to one instance from among the reams and reams and reams of observers' reports about often-overzealous Jacobins within the current tumult [Wikipedia: {{tq|"''Jacobin'' is sometimes used in the Anglosphere as a pejorative for radical, left-wing revolutionary politics.[3]"}}] such as the ''Economist'' so-gently skewers as "<u>the great and the good spouting platitudes or woke warriors itching to take offence</u>." I can ''dream'', can't I!--[[User:Hodgdon's secret garden|Hodgdon's secret garden]] ([[User talk:Hodgdon's secret garden|talk]]) 18:34, 26 March 2021 (UTC) |
|||
: I've moved this comment here because [[WP:TALK#USE|Article talk pages should be used to discuss ways to improve an article; not to criticize, pick apart, or vent about the current status of an article or its subject.]] There are ongoing discussions for improvements on the talk page already, based on [[WP:TALK#Maintain Wikipedia policy|existing policies and guidelines]]. These [[WP:TALK#Good practices for talk pages|lengthy messages]] of yours are becoming disruptive. —[[User:Sangdeboeuf|Sangdeboeuf]] ([[User talk:Sangdeboeuf|talk]]) 21:05, 26 March 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Thank you for your edits to CRT! == |
|||
Thank you for your edits to [[Critical Race Theory]]. I see that several of your edits have been reverted. I hope you don't feel discouraged by this. It's common on pages where some authors strong ideological perspectives. Your numerous citations and lists of references speak volumes to your dedication to accuracy! We need more editors like you! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:DenverCoder19|DenverCoder19]] ([[User talk:DenverCoder19#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/DenverCoder19|contribs]]) 01:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for March 19== |
|||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[Woke]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Progressive]]<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Woke check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Woke?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->. |
|||
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 06:13, 19 March 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Precious anniversary == |
|||
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=One}} --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:38, 22 March 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Important notice: post-1992 American politics == |
|||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' |
|||
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. |
|||
For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
|||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> Yearly reminder. —[[User:Sangdeboeuf|Sangdeboeuf]] ([[User talk:Sangdeboeuf|talk]]) 21:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 06:22, 28 November 2023
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Will this work? As far as I can tell, there isn't a colored version in Russian, but it's alright. Thanks so much by the way
censorship
Note this reversion, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anthony_Weiner&diff=432926151&oldid=432926091 which leaves out THE essential item of the entire incident μηδείς (talk)
Nomination of Etch-a-sketch gaffe for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Etch-a-sketch gaffe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etch-a-sketch gaffe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
A page you started (Tech4Good awards) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Tech4Good awards, Hodgdon's secret garden!
Wikipedia editor Dicklyon just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Good start. I adjust caps per MOS:CAPS and the cited source.
To reply, leave a comment on Dicklyon's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)