Seraphimblade (talk | contribs) →Civility parole ban on [[Kirovabad pogrom]]: Clarification |
|||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:Very well, I see that you weren't in the first case, and that's what ArbCom requires, so consider this the required warning. I'm really not sure what to tell you if you don't realize that accusing another editor of being on drugs is uncivil, but it most certainly is. Basically, speak in polite terms about ''content'', avoid discussing your opinion of other ''editors'' at all (or conjecture about their activity), and you should be fine. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 05:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC) |
:Very well, I see that you weren't in the first case, and that's what ArbCom requires, so consider this the required warning. I'm really not sure what to tell you if you don't realize that accusing another editor of being on drugs is uncivil, but it most certainly is. Basically, speak in polite terms about ''content'', avoid discussing your opinion of other ''editors'' at all (or conjecture about their activity), and you should be fine. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 05:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC) |
||
::Please don't get me wrong, if you think someone's incorrect, you have every right to disagree with them. Just stick to discussing the content rather than edit warring or discussing the editor, and you'll be fine. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 06:10, 28 August 2007 (UTC) |
::Please don't get me wrong, if you think someone's incorrect, you have every right to disagree with them. Just stick to discussing the content rather than edit warring or discussing the editor, and you'll be fine. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 06:10, 28 August 2007 (UTC) |
||
:::Also, while I realize I wasn't clear on that, and so I won't do any blocks or the like at this time, please note that as you've been notified, you are considered to be covered by the sanctions from [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan]], including the one revert per week per article limit, and the requirement for any reverts to be accompanied by a rationale posted to that article's talk page. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 06:06, 30 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== barnstar == |
== barnstar == |
Revision as of 06:06, 30 August 2007
Drop a line.
.
The above named arbitration case in which you were named as a party has closed. The remedy is as follows: The remedies of revert limitations (formerly revert parole), including the limitation of 1 revert per week, civility supervision (formerly civility parole) and supervised editing (formerly probation) that were put in place at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan shall apply to any editor who edits articles which relate to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related ethnic conflicts in an aggressive point of view manner marked by incivility. Before any penalty is applied, a warning placed on the editor's user talk page by an administrator shall serve as notice to the user that these remedies apply to them.
You may view the full case decisions here.
For the Arbitration Committee, - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 00:31, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Leo/Constantine
Thankyou, but I wouldn't call an auction firm a source. I assume the names on Armenian coins are Armenian? Were they ever in Latin or Greek? If the name on the coin is transliterated "Gosdantin" then so be it, but it should be translated Constantine, because it is in fac the same name. Again I ask, do Armenians refer to the first Christian emperor as Constantinus (transliterated into their alphabet) or do they call him Gosdantin? I do not oppose Hetoum, Smpad, and Toros as long as alternatives appear somewhere in the article, but Leo and Constantine are established usage and they appear frequently enough in English-language Crusade references. They are translatable and should be translated. We don't speak of Henri II of France and Felipe II of Spain, we call them Henry and Philip. But thanks anyway, I will look into that and I plan to check some sources in my library for common usage soon. Srnec 03:53, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- (Constantine and Leo are English, not Latin names.) Why don't you answer my question about Constantine the Great? Srnec 04:22, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Exactly. A non-Armenian gets an Armenian name in an Armenian encyclopaedia. As in Armenian, so in English: a non-Englishman may get an English name in an English encyclopaedia. Srnec 04:31, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Civility parole ban on Kirovabad pogrom
For failing to maintain civility [1] as required by Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2, you are notified that you are banned from editing the Kirovabad pogrom for a period of twenty-four hours, beginning as of this posting and to end at 04:38 (UTC) on Wednesday, August 29. Please be more careful to maintain civility with other editors, including in your edit summaries. Thank you. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:40, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Very well, I see that you weren't in the first case, and that's what ArbCom requires, so consider this the required warning. I'm really not sure what to tell you if you don't realize that accusing another editor of being on drugs is uncivil, but it most certainly is. Basically, speak in polite terms about content, avoid discussing your opinion of other editors at all (or conjecture about their activity), and you should be fine. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:44, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Please don't get me wrong, if you think someone's incorrect, you have every right to disagree with them. Just stick to discussing the content rather than edit warring or discussing the editor, and you'll be fine. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:10, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Also, while I realize I wasn't clear on that, and so I won't do any blocks or the like at this time, please note that as you've been notified, you are considered to be covered by the sanctions from Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan, including the one revert per week per article limit, and the requirement for any reverts to be accompanied by a rationale posted to that article's talk page. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:06, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Please don't get me wrong, if you think someone's incorrect, you have every right to disagree with them. Just stick to discussing the content rather than edit warring or discussing the editor, and you'll be fine. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:10, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
barnstar
First thanks a lot for the barnstar Hetoum, that means a lot to me. It might not look like that, but it is so easy to assume good faith, get rid of all the, let me say bullshit against the current citizens of countries, we are possibly filled in with. A lot of people were killed, it is very normal for you to feel animosity, especially when someone does not fully accept what you firmly believe in. But you should not let that feeling control you all the time. Some people deserve it, fortunately most people don't (the situation is possibly worse on Wikipedia due to human psychology). Just try and have an open mind; what the 'other side' is saying might be something that you would not definitely dislike (too many negatives, I know), that person might be feeling similar things. DenizTC 02:32, 30 August 2007 (UTC)