Hammersoft (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
::: Oh please, like the last 10+ opposes were cause of the user box, so don't give me that had nothing to do with it <font face="papyrus">[[User:Ctjf83|'''<font color="#ff0000">C</font><font color="#ff6600">t</font><font color="#ffff00">j</font><font color="#009900">f</font><font color="#0000ff">8</font><font color="#6600cc">3</font>''']][[Talk:Ctjf83|Talk]]</font> 18:35, 21 March 2008 (UTC) |
::: Oh please, like the last 10+ opposes were cause of the user box, so don't give me that had nothing to do with it <font face="papyrus">[[User:Ctjf83|'''<font color="#ff0000">C</font><font color="#ff6600">t</font><font color="#ffff00">j</font><font color="#009900">f</font><font color="#0000ff">8</font><font color="#6600cc">3</font>''']][[Talk:Ctjf83|Talk]]</font> 18:35, 21 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
:::*I'm saying your ''opinion'' had nothing to do with it. I'm not saying the userbox had nothing to do with it. It would be in your interest to understand that, and the policy it violated. --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft#top|talk]]) 19:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC) |
:::*I'm saying your ''opinion'' had nothing to do with it. I'm not saying the userbox had nothing to do with it. It would be in your interest to understand that, and the policy it violated. --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft#top|talk]]) 19:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
:::: Whatever, I'm just saying it's a bunch of crap. If the userbox said that bush is awesome, then I'm sure it wouldn't have been a problem, even though according to policy, it says no positive or negative unsourced info. <font face="papyrus">[[User:Ctjf83|'''<font color="#ff0000">C</font><font color="#ff6600">t</font><font color="#ffff00">j</font><font color="#009900">f</font><font color="#0000ff">8</font><font color="#6600cc">3</font>''']][[Talk:Ctjf83|Talk]]</font> 19:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:36, 21 March 2008
Locke Cole
You were absolutely right - I have unblocked Locke, and apologised. Thank you for pointing out my error! Neıl ☎ 15:33, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
My userpage
Please do not be rude in the edit summary when you change something on my userpage. I did not realize that I had that listed. Remember good faith edits? Thanks and Happy editing. Dustitalk to me 18:08, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Text based communication has limitations. It wasn't my intention to be rude, and assuming good faith also goes the other direction. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:28, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- I apologize, I should have thought of that. Honestly though, I didn't realize that the category was listed. Dustitalk to me 18:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- No worries, and I'm sorry for the miscommunication too. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- I apologize, I should have thought of that. Honestly though, I didn't realize that the category was listed. Dustitalk to me 18:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
I warned the vandal anyway, but thanks for seeing the vandalism to my userpage. Enigma msg! 17:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- No worries. We crossed paths in warning. Didn't mean to blank you, only him. You also edit conflicted me at AIV :) --Hammersoft (talk) 17:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For keeping my userpage watchlisted and reverting vandalism to it several times, even though we may have disagreed on some matters in the past. :) Enigma msg! 17:28, 7 March 2008 (UTC) |
- Bah humbug! If you weren't such a knee-biter I wouldn't be paying attention to your page ;) (joke..joke...relax :)) --Hammersoft (talk) 17:29, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
I've listed an arbitration case under this tentative name to resolve the longstanding conflict basically surrounding this issue. This is a message to inform you that you're listed a party there. Maxim(talk) 00:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Betacommand 2/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Betacommand 2/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Daniel (talk) 15:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- I choose not to participate, but thank you for the notice. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
I need your judgement
- I created a page of all the Greek chapters at the University of Florida. I used some images, and I need to know if it meets Wikipedia's approval. Here is the link: List of fraternities and sororities at the University of Florida.
Thanks! Jccort (talk) 16:51, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- I truly appreciate you asking! Unfortunately, no, by normal standards here they aren't acceptable since the images can and do exist on other pages, and the use of such images in list is frequently frowned upon. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:10, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Userbox
Where does it say that I can't voice my opinion in a userbox about how I feel about the president? Ctjf83Talk 17:13, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- Quoting WP:BLP:
- "An important rule of thumb when writing biographical material about living persons is 'do no harm'."
- "Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons ... should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion, from ... user pages"
- Also see Wikipedia:BLP#Non-article_space. The userbox was clearly and emphatically against policy. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:19, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- Well I hardly think my opinion is hardly worth an oppose, but I guess a lot of people agree Ctjf83Talk 17:28, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- It's not your opinion that's troublesome. It's that you violated WP:BLP, and still don't seem to understand the violation. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:29, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh please, like the last 10+ opposes were cause of the user box, so don't give me that had nothing to do with it Ctjf83Talk 18:35, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'm saying your opinion had nothing to do with it. I'm not saying the userbox had nothing to do with it. It would be in your interest to understand that, and the policy it violated. --Hammersoft (talk) 19:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Well I hardly think my opinion is hardly worth an oppose, but I guess a lot of people agree Ctjf83Talk 17:28, 20 March 2008 (UTC)