m changing archive template |
Azuredivay (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: contentious topics alert |
||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
:{{yo|JBW}}, Oh god. I feel a little guilty for making you do this apparently frivolous thing. Thanks a lot for this. - <span style="font-family: Cursive">[[User:Hako9|hako9]] ([[User talk:Hako9#footer|talk]])</span> 00:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC) |
:{{yo|JBW}}, Oh god. I feel a little guilty for making you do this apparently frivolous thing. Thanks a lot for this. - <span style="font-family: Cursive">[[User:Hako9|hako9]] ([[User talk:Hako9#footer|talk]])</span> 00:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC) |
||
:: Please don't feel guilty, because if you do I will have to feel even guiltier. I had my account renamed, and it caused more trouble than your rename did. [[User:JBW|JBW]] ([[User talk:JBW|talk]]) 20:25, 25 July 2020 (UTC) |
:: Please don't feel guilty, because if you do I will have to feel even guiltier. I had my account renamed, and it caused more trouble than your rename did. [[User:JBW|JBW]] ([[User talk:JBW|talk]]) 20:25, 25 July 2020 (UTC) |
||
==Notice== |
|||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' |
|||
You have shown interest in [[India]], [[Pakistan]], and [[Afghanistan]]. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. |
|||
For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
|||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> |
|||
== August 2020 == |
|||
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] You should remember to [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|assume good faith]] when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on [[:Talk:Ayurveda]].[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ayurveda&diff=prev&oldid=973958111] I pinged an uninvolved admin who commented there before and apparently has a better understanding of the relevant incidents to the discussion than admins. |
|||
But you are doing nothing more than displaying gross assumption of bad faith by falsely accusing me of a "ploy". You should strike your comment or remove it. [[User:Azuredivay|Azuredivay]] ([[User talk:Azuredivay|talk]]) 15:06, 20 August 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:06, 20 August 2020
Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.
|
||||
Karl Bushby
The recent information on Karl's whereabouts comes from his facebook page. You can see an interview from him (see link via http://onthegosolo.com/where-is-karl-bushby-2019/), which discusses his issues with an Iranian visa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeNaylor (talk • contribs) 05:52, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- @MikeNaylor: --Hi Mike. Facebook, twitter, other SNS are not taken as a reliable source for citation according to Wikipedia policies. Please read WP:INTREF4 for guidance. - Harsh 20:48, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Your RfC !vote
Hi - I hope my comments in the RfC did not somehow make you feel improperly compelled to change your !vote or WP:BLUDGEONed in some way. It's sometimes a fine line between debate and bludgeoning so I just wanted to make sure nothing I said made you feel strong-armed and, if it did, I hope you'd not be afraid to change you !vote back to Include. Thanks and my apologies if I said something inappropriate. Chetsford (talk) 22:55, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Chetsford: Oh absolutely not. I had to change the vote because the policy is very clear for BLPCRIME. The only room for interpretation is in the LPI guideline. By the way, I never knew I'd put in so much time researching about an adult movie actor. - Harsh 23:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
your comment irt Jigsaw_(power_tool) on 0albannabla0 page
Hello Harsh, thanks for helping and leaving a message on my page. I have been trying to merge these two pages since they were really redundant and there have been already two discussions over 5 years, plus one was stub. As you have guessed, I am quite new, but I was keen to help and this seemed the right thing to do, but it was my first merge so I may have botched it. Very sorry. I actually thought I succeeded, but presently you have undone my merge so the two pages are now identical (which made them even more redundant!) please I would appreciate if you could fix this. the pages are Jigsaw_(power_tool) and Jigsaw_(tool). thanks!
- Hi @0albannabla0: , First of all thank you for your edits and trying to improve wikipedia. I wrongly assumed your edits to be unconstructive. I'll surely help with the merge. Just give me a few minutes to check whether there is anything worth salvageable in the article before I redirect it. - Harsh 05:06, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Undisclosed Paid Editing Amongst Nigerian Editors
Following your comment in this AFD, you are very much correct. The blatant UPE/COI is very glaring & no matter how you try to explain things to some of my Nigerian co-editors they would not listen because they have a vested interest in the creation of that article. Look at the earlier draft of that article: Draft:Tobi Kukoyi, which I rejected here. You’d notice it was created by a different editor who was oblivious of the fact that very promotional articles aren’t welcome here and after I rejected it, a 'more experienced editor' who knows just how to fly under the radar recreates the article. If I were to make an educated guess I’d say the subject of the article is the one herself contacting editors to create a Wikipedia article for her. The undisclosed paid editing ring amongst my co Nigerian editors is exponentially growing. I have gone on to draw a table in that AFD as seen here but watch as the editor would still argue, why? they have a vested interest & there’s only so much we can do. Seeing as almost all genuine Nigerian editors have all gone dormant/inactive. Furthermore “Ranting” is a very common practice amongst UPE editors, they try to look as though they are being bullied or bitten & “cry for help” then subconsciously other editors & even Admins who should know better fall for their antics/theatrics. hCelestina007 (talk) 12:04, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Celestina007: Oh believe me, my fellow Indians aren't far behind with the COI edits. At the very least, this editor knew they need to request an AfC first. The backlog on Special:NewPagesFeed is usually riddled with articles failing to meet a shred of notability. I really commend you for not letting the article just pass by because of the 'more experienced editor' who tried to sneak it through and I can only understand your frustration in trying to explain things to ContentBI. I do think you made a mistake by engaging with the editor though. They usually keep arguing and wasting everyone's time in the AfD's. But anyways, AfD participation is a thankless job. But quite necessary. Thank you for the message. - Harsh (talk) 20:20, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
The TVSA Edit
The TVSA edit I made that you removed definently wasn't a test, as I felt like the page needed some extras.
I'd also like to mention that there are 2 pages of the same TV channel. One is called "Televizija Sarajevo" and the other one is called "TVSA". I don't know if you can do something about it, but it would be nice to remove one of the pages to clear out confusion. m1nt (talk) 23:24, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. I'll merge the two but let me check the articles first. - Harsh (talk) 23:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Incogn99: Are you sure these are the same channels? I don't want to merge two different articles. - Harsh (talk) 23:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
They are, but to avoid confusion I'll give some backstory.
Basically, during Yugoslav time (in 1961), RTV Sarajevo was made, as part of the JRT system. When Bosnia declared independence back in 1992, that same channel would leave that system and become RTVBIH, or today known as BHRT. Few years after the war, a seperate channel called Televizija Sarajevo was made, which is owned by the Sarajevo Canton.
I'll make some updates to the page if needed. m1nt (talk) 23:43, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
(TVSA = Televizija Sarajevo) m1nt (talk) 23:44, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Incogn99: Can you specify explicitly which parts of the article Televizija Sarajevo should be included in TVSA? Once the merge plus redirect is done, the page histories and talk pages will be intact so you can edit TVSA anyways. - Harsh (talk) 23:54, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Don't include this part from "Televizija Sarajevo" as I'm unsure if it's accurate ir not:
"Televizija Sarajevo merged with the M&H Company and became Radio Television of Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1992."
Other parts are fine and I'll edit the rest. m1nt (talk) 00:03, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
GIRGARRE
Dear Sir/Madam
It seems to me it is not made clear that a source is compulsory when one attempts an edit on an article.
That said, My source was the Riverine Herald newspaper.
Could you please re-instate it as I do not have a copy of my posted edit.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8004:1420:245C:113D:CDE3:C866:3F27 (talk) 11:25, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Account renamed
As you must have seen by the time you read this, I have renamed your account from "Harsh 2580" to "Hako9". (Actually, if you are at all interested, after the difficulties with your other proposed new user names, even this change was not straightforward. The software refused to do the rename, on the grounds that there was already a global account named "Hako 9", which is too similar. Normally I would agree with that, but Hako 9 has made a grand total of one edit, that one being on French Wikipedia in 2013, so I reckon the risk of causing confusion is negligible, and I decided to over-ride the block on the name.) JBW (talk) 21:08, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- @JBW:, Oh god. I feel a little guilty for making you do this apparently frivolous thing. Thanks a lot for this. - hako9 (talk) 00:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
August 2020
You should remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Ayurveda.[1] I pinged an uninvolved admin who commented there before and apparently has a better understanding of the relevant incidents to the discussion than admins.
But you are doing nothing more than displaying gross assumption of bad faith by falsely accusing me of a "ploy". You should strike your comment or remove it. Azuredivay (talk) 15:06, 20 August 2020 (UTC)