Razr Nation (talk | contribs) →Arbitration: Argentine history: reply to Cambalachero |
→Arbitration: Argentine history: yeah, right... |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Hello. I have to comment that, because of a recent flood in Buenos Aires, my house is a disaster and there is a general blackout in several neighbours, including mine. I hope that I will be able to fill the evidence in the time required, but I must point in advance that I may need to ask for more time, and that I may not be immediately available for questions that may take place (I have already pointed that in my talk page). You can confirm that this is not an excuse [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-22016255 here], [http://www.buenosairesherald.com/article/127740/worst-storm-since-1906-emergency-crews-not-enough-to-help-350000-affected-residents-macri here] and [http://news.msn.com/world/heavy-rain-floods-argentinas-capital-5-dead here], among other sources: as you see, we are talking about the worst flood in Buenos Aires in the last century. I hope you'll understand. [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 13:41, 3 April 2013 (UTC) |
Hello. I have to comment that, because of a recent flood in Buenos Aires, my house is a disaster and there is a general blackout in several neighbours, including mine. I hope that I will be able to fill the evidence in the time required, but I must point in advance that I may need to ask for more time, and that I may not be immediately available for questions that may take place (I have already pointed that in my talk page). You can confirm that this is not an excuse [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-22016255 here], [http://www.buenosairesherald.com/article/127740/worst-storm-since-1906-emergency-crews-not-enough-to-help-350000-affected-residents-macri here] and [http://news.msn.com/world/heavy-rain-floods-argentinas-capital-5-dead here], among other sources: as you see, we are talking about the worst flood in Buenos Aires in the last century. I hope you'll understand. [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 13:41, 3 April 2013 (UTC) |
||
:Thanks for letting me know, and don't worry. I understand (and I'm completely sure that the arbs do too) that real life things happen, and if you need more time, it'll be provided given the circumstances. I hope everything is okay with you and your family there. Take you time, and solve the issues you have to. After all, real life comes first :) — [[User:Hahc21|<font color="#333333">'''ΛΧΣ'''</font>]][[User_talk:Hahc21|<font color="#336699">'''<sup>21</sup>'''</font>]] 14:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC) |
:Thanks for letting me know, and don't worry. I understand (and I'm completely sure that the arbs do too) that real life things happen, and if you need more time, it'll be provided given the circumstances. I hope everything is okay with you and your family there. Take you time, and solve the issues you have to. After all, real life comes first :) — [[User:Hahc21|<font color="#333333">'''ΛΧΣ'''</font>]][[User_talk:Hahc21|<font color="#336699">'''<sup>21</sup>'''</font>]] 14:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC) |
||
::There is always an excuse for him.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_mediation%2FJuan_Manuel_de_Rosas&diff=535467883&oldid=535466872] I'm going to use that excuse too: [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-21055803][http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/04/us-brazil-drought-idUSBRE9030HM20130104] It's amazing that people still fall for what he says. --[[User:Lecen|Lecen]] ([[User talk:Lecen|talk]]) 19:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Chopra FAC == |
== Chopra FAC == |
Revision as of 19:32, 3 April 2013
Contributions Schedule · Academy · To do · RFA · Templates · Files · Barnstars & Awards · Featured content · Good articles · GA reviews · DYK · DYK reviews · Articles |
|
Arbitration: Argentine history
Hi, Hahc21. I added my statement at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Argentine History/Evidence. I don't know if it's larger than allowed. Once you read it, you'll understand that the issue is quite complex, mainly because it has stretched for four years and over several different articles. I'd like to ask you to keep it is as it is, since it will give a fair representation of what is the problem without the possibility of presenting diffs and information out of context. Thank you, --Lecen (talk) 17:50, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- It actually is quite long, given that you only have 1000 words to write your statement, and that was why I collapsed it, so that the evidence page does not end being very long. Notwithstanding, I understand your point. You might want to write to one of the drafting arbitrators and tell them that you need all that evidence there, and ask for an extension of the word count. Cheers. — ΛΧΣ21 17:54, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- I sent a message to Kirill Lokshin. Thank you very much. --Lecen (talk) 18:00, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- Great. You're very welcome. If you need anything, just ask me :) — ΛΧΣ21 18:01, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- My statement on the evidence page is actually an enlarged and improved version of the statement I wrote on the arbitration main page. Could you somehow add a message to the arbitrators telling them to ignore the first statement (perhaps collapsing it entirely and providing a link to the second statement?) and focus solely on the second one (in the evidence page)? Thus they won't have the need to read two similar statements. --Lecen (talk) 18:04, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- Don't worry about it. The statement on the main case page, which is the original statement you wrote when the case was requested, is saved as-is for the purposes of archiving. The arbitrators will now look only to your statement in the evidence page when assessing the situation and reaching their conclusions :) — ΛΧΣ21 18:08, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- My statement on the evidence page is actually an enlarged and improved version of the statement I wrote on the arbitration main page. Could you somehow add a message to the arbitrators telling them to ignore the first statement (perhaps collapsing it entirely and providing a link to the second statement?) and focus solely on the second one (in the evidence page)? Thus they won't have the need to read two similar statements. --Lecen (talk) 18:04, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- Great. You're very welcome. If you need anything, just ask me :) — ΛΧΣ21 18:01, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- I sent a message to Kirill Lokshin. Thank you very much. --Lecen (talk) 18:00, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
I've (sort of) granted an extension of the evidence limits, subject to certain constraints; please see User talk:Kirill Lokshin#Arbitration: Argentine history for the details. I'd appreciate it if you could let the other parties know that the extension applies to them as well. Thanks! Kirill [talk] 21:56, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi. Kirill Lokshin told me that I should have one section dealing solely with the other party (with 1000 words at most) and another section dealing with the sources (with 2000 words at most). How do I know how many words are written at both? Could you add a bot to each? Or is there another way? --Lecen (talk) 22:38, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- The bot recognizes and analyzes each section with a level two header. My recommendation is to use a level two header for the initial statement regarding the dispute (e.g.
== Evidence presented by Lecen ==
) and another level two section for the discussion about sources (e.g.== Source discussion presented by Lecen ==
, or similar). That way, the bot will count the number of words and diffs under each section. Regards. — ΛΧΣ21 00:50, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- The bot recognizes and analyzes each section with a level two header. My recommendation is to use a level two header for the initial statement regarding the dispute (e.g.
Hello. I have to comment that, because of a recent flood in Buenos Aires, my house is a disaster and there is a general blackout in several neighbours, including mine. I hope that I will be able to fill the evidence in the time required, but I must point in advance that I may need to ask for more time, and that I may not be immediately available for questions that may take place (I have already pointed that in my talk page). You can confirm that this is not an excuse here, here and here, among other sources: as you see, we are talking about the worst flood in Buenos Aires in the last century. I hope you'll understand. Cambalachero (talk) 13:41, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know, and don't worry. I understand (and I'm completely sure that the arbs do too) that real life things happen, and if you need more time, it'll be provided given the circumstances. I hope everything is okay with you and your family there. Take you time, and solve the issues you have to. After all, real life comes first :) — ΛΧΣ21 14:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Chopra FAC
Hey, pls comment on Chopra FAC. I have nominated it. Last time you weren't able to comment as the candidate was closed because of less inputs. I hope you will comment soon and you'll help in the fac.Prashant talk 19:47, 2 April 2013 (UTC)