Holocaust content dispute notification |
→The Holocaust content dispute: diff done |
||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
==The Holocaust content dispute== |
==The Holocaust content dispute== |
||
I've created [[Talk:The_Holocaust/Sandbox|a sandbox page]] to discuss the content dispute on [[The Holocaust]]. Your comments are welcome! – [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]]</small> 07:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC) |
I've created [[Talk:The_Holocaust/Sandbox|a sandbox page]] to discuss the content dispute on [[The Holocaust]]. Your comments are welcome! – [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]]</small> 07:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
I have finished scanning the disputed diff and placed the significant edits on the [[Talk:The_Holocaust/Sandbox#Disputed_Diff|Sandbox page]]. – [[User:Dreadstar|Dreadstar]] <small>[[User talk:Dreadstar|<span class="Unicode">†</span>]]</small> 01:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:47, 31 July 2007
Welcome!
|
Re: Titanic
Apologies if I reverted constructive edits. When I see massive chunks of text being deleted without an explanation, it is usually not a good sign. Although it is not necessary, filling in the edit summary greatly helps contributors understanding what you are doing. Thanks! Spellcast 20:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- If you go on RMS Titanic and click on 'History' at the top of the page, you'll see that another editor (John) has changed some of your edits. I would recommend either discussing with him or on Talk:RMS Titanic. Spellcast 20:40, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
You should cross-post that to WT:TAIWAN. Ling.Nut 01:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- I finished up the rest of the notifications. Hadseys, you've got three featured article reviews running now; I just wanted to make sure you've read all of the instructions at the top of WP:FAR. Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 05:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Your edits
Hi Hadseys, could you explain why you removed that material from The Holocaust? And why you did not include any edit summaries for the removal? Thanks, Crum375 18:14, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Well, it would help if you discuss removal of sourced material on the talk page, and also if you explain your action via edit summaries. Thanks, Crum375 18:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:742 evergreen terrace.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:742 evergreen terrace.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. WillMak050389 16:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
The Holocaust content dispute
I've created a sandbox page to discuss the content dispute on The Holocaust. Your comments are welcome! – Dreadstar † 07:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC) I have finished scanning the disputed diff and placed the significant edits on the Sandbox page. – Dreadstar † 01:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC)