Content deleted Content added
HJ Mitchell (talk | contribs) →Supreme Deliciousness: reply |
Supreme Deliciousness (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
::::HJ Mitchell, I did not mean to upset you, and I apologize if I have. You told me from the beginning that you might lift the topic ban after one month, and this was without me asking for it. I requested the topic ban to be lifted so I could return editing all the articles I want to edit, and it was not a disingenuous request to file an enforcement request. I understand now that it came out wrong, as you have reacted to it, it wont happen again. --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 23:13, 26 February 2011 (UTC) |
::::HJ Mitchell, I did not mean to upset you, and I apologize if I have. You told me from the beginning that you might lift the topic ban after one month, and this was without me asking for it. I requested the topic ban to be lifted so I could return editing all the articles I want to edit, and it was not a disingenuous request to file an enforcement request. I understand now that it came out wrong, as you have reacted to it, it wont happen again. --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 23:13, 26 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::::You haven't upset me, but I don't appreciate being made to look an idiot. More to the point, it's hardly encouraging that the first thing you do when your topic ban ends is file at AE, which suggests the topic ban hasn't served its purpose. If I were you, I would make damn sure that all my contributions in the topic area from now on were ''unambiguously'' helpful. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ Mitchell'''</font>]] | [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]] 23:59, 26 February 2011 (UTC) |
:::::You haven't upset me, but I don't appreciate being made to look an idiot. More to the point, it's hardly encouraging that the first thing you do when your topic ban ends is file at AE, which suggests the topic ban hasn't served its purpose. If I were you, I would make damn sure that all my contributions in the topic area from now on were ''unambiguously'' helpful. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ Mitchell'''</font>]] | [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]] 23:59, 26 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::::::No one has made you look like an idiot. I made a mistake. --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 00:18, 27 February 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:18, 27 February 2011
This talk page is archived regularly by a bot so I can focus on the freshest discussions. If your thread was archived but you had more to say, feel free to rescue it from the archive.
DYK for Colin Boag
Materialscientist (talk) 18:04, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Supreme Deliciousness
I was not going to second guess your decision to lift the ban early since it was done in the best of faith. However, I have requested that it be reimplemented for the full two months. I very well could be wrong but either way, your input as the involved admin would be appreciated: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Supreme Deliciousness.Cptnono (talk) 22:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
HJ Mitchell, the enforcement I filed against user Jijutsugy is 100% legitimate. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 22:17, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Regardless of whether it's legitimate or not, it somewhat knocks my willingness to AGF when you go and file an AE request against JJG within hours of the topic ban ending. That you've been collecting diffs on him during your topic ban clearly shows that you haven;t been abiding by the spirit of it. Next time, I won't be so naive. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:26, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- I haven't been collecting diffs during my entire topic ban, in the end when you said you was going to lift it I started preparing it. I couldn't file it during my topic ban right? So what was I supposed to do? Forget about these legitimate concerns? What difference does it make if I had waited 1 or 2 days until you lifted it before I started preparing the enforcement? Please look at the things I brought up . --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 22:36, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- That's not the point, and, what's more, if you can't or won't see that it's not the point, then I think you would benefit from a lengthy absence from the topic area. I'll leave JJG's AE case to be decided on its merits by other admins, but your disingenuous request for the topic ban to be lifted early only to go and start an AE thread to eliminate your opponent is textbook battleground behaviour. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:54, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- HJ Mitchell, I did not mean to upset you, and I apologize if I have. You told me from the beginning that you might lift the topic ban after one month, and this was without me asking for it. I requested the topic ban to be lifted so I could return editing all the articles I want to edit, and it was not a disingenuous request to file an enforcement request. I understand now that it came out wrong, as you have reacted to it, it wont happen again. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 23:13, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- You haven't upset me, but I don't appreciate being made to look an idiot. More to the point, it's hardly encouraging that the first thing you do when your topic ban ends is file at AE, which suggests the topic ban hasn't served its purpose. If I were you, I would make damn sure that all my contributions in the topic area from now on were unambiguously helpful. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:59, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- No one has made you look like an idiot. I made a mistake. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 00:18, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- You haven't upset me, but I don't appreciate being made to look an idiot. More to the point, it's hardly encouraging that the first thing you do when your topic ban ends is file at AE, which suggests the topic ban hasn't served its purpose. If I were you, I would make damn sure that all my contributions in the topic area from now on were unambiguously helpful. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:59, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- HJ Mitchell, I did not mean to upset you, and I apologize if I have. You told me from the beginning that you might lift the topic ban after one month, and this was without me asking for it. I requested the topic ban to be lifted so I could return editing all the articles I want to edit, and it was not a disingenuous request to file an enforcement request. I understand now that it came out wrong, as you have reacted to it, it wont happen again. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 23:13, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- That's not the point, and, what's more, if you can't or won't see that it's not the point, then I think you would benefit from a lengthy absence from the topic area. I'll leave JJG's AE case to be decided on its merits by other admins, but your disingenuous request for the topic ban to be lifted early only to go and start an AE thread to eliminate your opponent is textbook battleground behaviour. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:54, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- I haven't been collecting diffs during my entire topic ban, in the end when you said you was going to lift it I started preparing it. I couldn't file it during my topic ban right? So what was I supposed to do? Forget about these legitimate concerns? What difference does it make if I had waited 1 or 2 days until you lifted it before I started preparing the enforcement? Please look at the things I brought up . --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 22:36, 26 February 2011 (UTC)