2a02:a44c:6682:1:41d9:c9cb:c73:4e94 (talk) →Dead links: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
2a02:a44c:6682:1:41d9:c9cb:c73:4e94 (talk) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
Your putting links in your edit summaries, and every time I click on it, it says that there’s an error, and my phone crashes. |
Your putting links in your edit summaries, and every time I click on it, it says that there’s an error, and my phone crashes. |
||
If your trying to spam me, or hack my phone, Stop immediately! |
If your trying to spam me, or hack my phone, Stop immediately! |
||
Also, according to many online polls & statistics, Danish people have a 15% higher iQ level than British people, and a 32% higher iQ level than Americans. |
|||
So I think it’s maybe a better idea if I then takeover your work, and you just do the fixing typo’s and such. |
|||
Does that sound like a good plan? |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/2A02:A44C:6682:1:41D9:C9CB:C73:4E94|2A02:A44C:6682:1:41D9:C9CB:C73:4E94]] ([[User talk:2A02:A44C:6682:1:41D9:C9CB:C73:4E94|talk]]) 14:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:15, 30 January 2023
Your submission at Articles for creation: Montcada i Reixac rail crash (January 4)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Montcada i Reixac rail crash and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Greyzxq!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 13:18, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
|
Removing talkpage comments
I don't really see what the issue was with those talkpage comments. Nothing I saw warranted removal, am I just not seeing what you are seeing there? Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 01:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Lots of them were just the editor saying things they had already said in their edit summaries on the actual article, e.g. the Liz Truss section, or just them getting frustrated and putting it on the talk page, e.g. the Glitch section. Furthermore, I also explained many of the things they had said there in my edit summaries. greyzxq talk 01:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- I'd have two questions though:
- Does leaving them there violate any rules?
- Is it worthwhile removing them if it is only going to escalate the situation? Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 01:11, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Of course it wasn’t my intention to escalate the situation, and I was hoping that by now the editor would have understood, but they just don’t. I’ll leave it to you to decide whether or not to remove the stuff from the talk page, because after everything I’m not sure whether it would be right for me to make the decision., and I’m not 100% sure on the rules for talk pages. greyzxq talk 01:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Well, removing those comments was against the rules for talkpages. You should only remove content which violates WP:NOTFORUM (full rules are here). But hey, we all make mistakes. You handled their personal attacks quite well. Sure they were technically correct, but they shouldn't have gone about spouting off like that. Even though you did break the rules, they are defintely closer to a block than you. You may also want to read Wikipedia:Edit war, which applies to all pages, not just articles. Anyway, cheerio and happy editing! 🙂 Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 01:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help, and the main reason I did remove at least some of them was beacuse they weren't really discussions, like said on WP:NOTFORUM. greyzxq talk 01:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Well, removing those comments was against the rules for talkpages. You should only remove content which violates WP:NOTFORUM (full rules are here). But hey, we all make mistakes. You handled their personal attacks quite well. Sure they were technically correct, but they shouldn't have gone about spouting off like that. Even though you did break the rules, they are defintely closer to a block than you. You may also want to read Wikipedia:Edit war, which applies to all pages, not just articles. Anyway, cheerio and happy editing! 🙂 Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 01:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Of course it wasn’t my intention to escalate the situation, and I was hoping that by now the editor would have understood, but they just don’t. I’ll leave it to you to decide whether or not to remove the stuff from the talk page, because after everything I’m not sure whether it would be right for me to make the decision., and I’m not 100% sure on the rules for talk pages. greyzxq talk 01:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Dead links
Can you stop sending me links? Your putting links in your edit summaries, and every time I click on it, it says that there’s an error, and my phone crashes.
If your trying to spam me, or hack my phone, Stop immediately!
Also, according to many online polls & statistics, Danish people have a 15% higher iQ level than British people, and a 32% higher iQ level than Americans. So I think it’s maybe a better idea if I then takeover your work, and you just do the fixing typo’s and such. Does that sound like a good plan?
2A02:A44C:6682:1:41D9:C9CB:C73:4E94 (talk) 14:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC)