Graeme Bartlett (talk | contribs) →User:Trunki: yes move |
Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) →Tim Rogers (writer): new section |
||
Line 213: | Line 213: | ||
Thanks '''''[[User:CalumH93|<font color="#307D7E">Calum</font><font color="#55CAFA">H93</font>]]'''''|[[User_Talk:CalumH93|<font color="#008000">talk</font>]] 22:26, 30 July 2010 (UTC) |
Thanks '''''[[User:CalumH93|<font color="#307D7E">Calum</font><font color="#55CAFA">H93</font>]]'''''|[[User_Talk:CalumH93|<font color="#008000">talk</font>]] 22:26, 30 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
:Your points are correct, I will move it and block user! [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett#top|talk]]) 22:27, 30 July 2010 (UTC) |
:Your points are correct, I will move it and block user! [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett#top|talk]]) 22:27, 30 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
== [[Tim Rogers (writer)]] == |
|||
My intent originally was to complete a nomination at the [[Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion#Tim_Rogers_deletion|request of an IP editor]] but noticed that it had previously been deleted at AFD so I decided to give G4 a shot first. --[[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 22:29, 30 July 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:29, 30 July 2010
Older talk is in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 archives.
If I deleted your article, it may be possible for me to restore it. Please post a message for reconsideration of the deletion. and you can read Why was my page deleted?
please add your talk at the bottom of the page:
Maximus Carontus Page Deleted
I have no idea how Wikipedia works. Jsu now trying to figure it out. But Maximus Carontus gets googled. It has had thousands of marketing dollars spent on just the logo, so people will google the logo to find out what it is and wind up back to the marketing site that created it. I figured it would be a good idea to post a wiki article on actual person behind logo. I am new to Wiki and trying to figure out how it works as I go along. Was going to continue to update and elaborate the article. Please reconsider the "A7" deletion. Thanks! maxcarpro@gmail.com (Sorry if I just hi-jacked someone elses post. Wasn't sure how to write my own.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxcarpro (talk • contribs) 16:47, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Vanatoru tennis hoax
All articles on Wikipedia regarding Sebastian Gabriel Vanatoru/Vînătoru are blatant hoaxes and the articles are created by a sock puppeteer. He is a vandal too modifying many tennis articles and replacing players name with his own in competitions like the 4 Grand Slams. You can see here some archived deleted articles with this hoax: User_talk:NawlinWiki#Vanatoru_vandal and here: User_talk:NawlinWiki/Archive_41#Tennis_hoaxes_by_Sebiku_and_socks. Thank you. Please block this user. (Tennis Helper (talk) 14:01, 6 July 2010 (UTC))
re:hoax tagging.
I tagged Route 46 (MTA Maryland) and Route 47 (MTA Maryland) as hoaxes because the article summary summarizes them as quickbus routes currently operating in the MTA Maryland bus network. These routes don't exist.--ETLamborghini (talk) 23:42, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 22:17, 7 July 2010 (UTC). You can at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I made two userbox and the template above! How do they look? Mr. R00t Talk 22:19, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
I hadn't finished my page, I have a lot more to add on it and I am still learning how this works. I don't know where to store it until I finish. Please reconsider and give me another chance to finish the Hazy Malaze page. Hazy abi 12:50, 8 July 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hazy abi (talk • contribs)
FYI
Just FYI Portal:Telehealth looks like the same guy that tried to make Portal:HealthLink BC ...hope i am not bugging you :) Moxy (talk) 01:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Integrity | ||
Thank you for doing right by new editors Moxy (talk) 02:06, 8 July 2010 (UTC) |
Hi!
Please delete Oluf III of Denmark too. Thanks. --Againme (talk) 15:19, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Please reconsider the speedy on this one. The article claims that the founder/owner has won awards, not that the company has. Also note that the sole contributor appears to be the same person, introducing a massive COI and spam concerns. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 01:40, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Declined speedy on Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (United Arab Emirates)
You declined the speedy deletion at Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (United Arab Emirates). The entire text of the article is an obvious copyvio. See [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Is there a reason for the declined speedy? SnottyWong chatter 03:52, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Lazkao Txiki
Hi Graeme. Can you please take another look at this speedy? From what I remember it seemed to assert notability fairly strongly. Googling his name gives 160,000 results, and he has an article on a couple of foreing-language Wikis ([7] and [8]), so I'm thinking A7 may not apply here. Whether he's notable or not I'm not sure, but some of those Google hits look quite promising. Alzarian16 (talk) 10:24, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'll try to improve it some time over the weekend. I think there's enough material out there, although it's mostly in foreign languages so I may take some time to sort through it. Alzarian16 (talk) 13:27, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Sean Meenan Page
Hi why was this page deleted? There are a lot of pages dedicated to people on Wikipedia and Sean Meenan is actually mentioned is a couple of them. He's an american businessman who's pushing the environmental movement forward in each of his businesses. He's an initial investor of etsy, which is noted on their wikipedia page, and currently co-owns the newest Cafe Habana with Rande Gerber, who also has a Wikipedia page. Please reconsider the deletion. Thanks Ecoeatery (talk) 18:25, 9 July 2010 (UTC) Jeff
hi ok so i want to know why did my page get deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaquille "Shaqcago" Smith (talk • contribs) 07:04, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Why was page deleted
Information on "Peter Facione" page you delted is 100% true and verifiable. No copyright violations were involved. If it is not appropriate to post page about self, then that is a different matter. It is easy enough to have someone else post it. Please advise. Am new to Wikipedia's policies, quiks, norms, and customs. Thanks for your help. P Facione. pfacione@measuredreasons.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pfacione (talk • contribs) 20:13, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Again, thank you. The bio I am trying to put in Wiki is same as the one in Leading Authorities, is same as one on my business website, is same as one in my last book by Pearson Education - more or less with minor changes. Why? Same person wrote them. Leading Authorities does not have copyright, even if they try to assert it. I have copyright on that bio. So the question is whether to simply reinstate it, or to take the time to rewrite it. It would be easiest all around if you reinstate it. There was nothing plagerized or false in the bio. Please advise. Thanks. Pfacione (talk) 21:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
--Pfacione (talk) 21:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Communiqué "Geochange"
You edited this article Communiqué "Geochange" and remove hangon as infringing text removed. But now article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. And some admins want to delete this article. Please help me to keep my article. Explain me what i must edit. Thanks.Ismail Valiyev (talk) 07:59, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Why not merge this subject instead of speedy deleting [9]? A lot of damage has been done to the encyclopedia because of these improper speedy deletions. Please exercise greater consideration in the future and consider using AfD instead, so other editors will have an opportunity to weigh in. Also, can you please restore the article so it can be merged? Here's a source [10] took a single google books search to find. The backlinks also need restoration.Freakshownerd (talk) 17:28, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Message added 00:43, 17 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 00:43, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- You learn something new everyday. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 16:31, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Aß listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aß. Since you had some involvement with the Aß redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 01:12, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Time
WRT RfD#Aß, there is a back-story here.
I hate to waste even more time over this, but I feel it only reasonable to fill you in on the background here, which really, really is a waste of time.
User talk:Chzz/Archive 24#Crint Eastwood and D77t and D78t
Which was archived to preserve sanity, but continues, User talk:Chzz#Crint Eastwood and D77t and D78t.
I am sorry; I know this is whole thing is pointless. Chzz ► 09:22, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Typhronemon5...
...is apparently a sock of the banned user Brucejenner. It's up to you, but indeffing him would normally be called for. Also, I have asked for semi-protection of the "Marriage" page that he keeps attacking under various guises. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 21:57, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- Yes if he is a sock, is there any evidence of this? Semi protect will just stop the band new sock though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:15, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- Here's the SPI: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brucejenner The latest filer has asked for a CU "sweep" to see if there are other sleeper accounts lurking. It wouldn't surprise me, since BJ has been a recurring abuser for about the past year. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 22:27, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- This user had been blocked indefinitely. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:28, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
- Here's the SPI: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brucejenner The latest filer has asked for a CU "sweep" to see if there are other sleeper accounts lurking. It wouldn't surprise me, since BJ has been a recurring abuser for about the past year. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 22:27, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Recent Changes Camp Canberra Aug 11, 2010
I saw you're listed in the ACT Wikipedian page and thought, by chance, you might like to come to this:
RecentChangesCamp, Canberra is being held at the University of Canberra, Building 7, Room 7XC37 on 11 August 2010.
ABOUT | REGISTRATION | SCHEDULE
Hope we'll see you and friends there, but please register so we can prepare lunch. Leighblackall (talk) 07:19, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
/* Global Network for the Forecasting of Earthquakes */
Dear Mr.Graeme Bartlett
Please join debate. And tell your opinion. Thanks in advance
Best regards
--Shahin Khalilov (talk) 06:39, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Unfair Deletion
The deletion of Gofnet.com by you is very unfair. The article was an essential ingredient for Wikipedia and should not be deleted. It describes Gofnet.com, which is a song search engine, a different concept in itself. Its deletion should be re-considered. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajit garga (talk • contribs) 13:42, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Please restore Gofnet.com
Dear Sir,
Kindly restore the article for Gofnet.com
--Ajit garga (talk) 13:53, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
I really think Kig (Slur) is an attack page on somebody named Kig. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 00:18, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Band of the hand poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Band of the hand poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:28, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- restored use to article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:46, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Request
Please can you block me until 2 august 2010 Because of my very important exams
Thanks RahulChoudhary 13:59, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Can I ask you the rational behind the declining of the CSD on the above, as even the refs supplied are not about the organisation and the page makes no claim to significance as I can tell. Codf1977 (talk) 12:39, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- I just felt like this was a page worth keeping. But no reason solid enough to put on a edit summary. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:58, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
No big deal but
[11]. Note in the future the advice here that bans apply regardless of 'good faith'. By declining to speedy delete the article started by the banned user, it's turned the AfD discussion into a battleground with his sockpuppets and an ANI report. Banned users are disruptive to the entire project as a whole and that is why they are banned. Giving an inch of help has been more disruptive and time wasting than just deleting their contributions entirely would have been. It's not a huge complaint, but something to consider next time you run into the situation. Thanks. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
- Speedy deletes need some evidence, so for banned user or socks there should be a link to SPI or ban notice (could be on user page). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:20, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Johann Schmid
{{subst:empty template|This template must be substituted. Replace {{Courtesy blanked
with {{subst:Courtesy blanked
.}}
Just to let you know that the above page which you deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement has been recreated with the same content - I have tagged it for speedy deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 18:21, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- PS the tag should not have been G4 as there was no deletion discussion, but it was a G12 copyright infringement. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:16, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I have noted that for future reference. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:34, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
CBF logo
I noticed you declined the speedy for File:CBF logo.svg. However, it violates two conditions of free-use: it's an svg and thus not low-resolution and it doesn't have a rationale for every use. Also, a number of the rationales given contradict each other in their usage. As no svg version would be suitable, this file should be deleted, as uploading a "smaller" version would have no effect.
Additional discussion is at WP:VPM#CBF Logo. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 22:35, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Block
Please see User talk:LessHeard vanU. If you follow the same terms, by all means, block me. Please follow the terms carefully as far as block duration, reason, and page protecting my user talk page so that I don't have to police it (which defeats the purpose of being blocked). MVOO (talk) 23:56, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Copyright process heads-up
I just came across UKAIS and thought you should know: the appropriate process for dealing with articles where the content has been copied but permission is asserted is (in addition to declining the speedy deletion as you did) to blank the article using {{subst:copyvio|url=insert URL here}}
, as many OTRS releases never come through or are inadequate. Wikipedia:Copyright violations has more details if you feel like wading through it. Cheers! VernoWhitney (talk) 00:27, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for responding to this so quickly! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:42, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Zenage Studios
Kindly restore Zenage Studios article page. This company has been creating several apps that are available on Apple Store and Android Market. You can find its references in Apple itunes and Android market. Zenage Studios has also produced iphone apps for "The Marathi Abhimaangeet" or " The Marathi Abhimaan Geet" - the song with 112 established singers and a chorus line of 356 singers from all over India. You will find references for this also.
Kbhardwaj (talk) 03:57, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Courtesy blanking
Hi, Graeme. I'm in the process of courtesy blanking some content for a vanished user. I hope you don't mind. He is very adamant about it, and I would hope to accommodate him in this if we can. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
- OK I will let you get away with it! (and check if you are nominating deletions also). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:28, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. :) The only content he created seems to be Johann Schmid. I've removed his username from the log, but didn't feel comfortable deleting it. You and I are the only editors of consequence, other than him. I don't mind if you don't. When working on new content, I tried researching the guy at google books but did not find any other sources; he may be of borderline notability anyway. Of course, I don't mind retaining it, either, if you prefer. I really don't know what constitutes notability for WWII pilots. :/ I've removed his contributions from every talk page where I found it. That only leaves this change, which is not even creative enough to require attribution. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:59, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
- My contribution to Johann Schmid was deleting some text and leaving the original writings of the user, and sticking on a reference section. So essentially nothing. I know nothing about the topic either! I think the article claims enough importance to not be a speedy candidate, but leave it to others to AFD if they want. However I would not be surprised if the vanished user comes back in the future! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:26, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. :) The only content he created seems to be Johann Schmid. I've removed his username from the log, but didn't feel comfortable deleting it. You and I are the only editors of consequence, other than him. I don't mind if you don't. When working on new content, I tried researching the guy at google books but did not find any other sources; he may be of borderline notability anyway. Of course, I don't mind retaining it, either, if you prefer. I really don't know what constitutes notability for WWII pilots. :/ I've removed his contributions from every talk page where I found it. That only leaves this change, which is not even creative enough to require attribution. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:59, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
User:Trunki
Hi
I was wondering if you could take another look at User:Trunki which you speedy declined. The main reason i speedied was the "article" is because it is on the users page and not a wiki article page, with the username being the name of the product. The content itself appears ok, and should possibly be moved to its own article page? Also, the username appears to be a violation of the Username policy, specifically WP:USERNAME#Company/group names.
Thanks CalumH93|talk 22:26, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- Your points are correct, I will move it and block user! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:27, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
My intent originally was to complete a nomination at the request of an IP editor but noticed that it had previously been deleted at AFD so I decided to give G4 a shot first. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:29, 30 July 2010 (UTC)