Reference
http://wiki.roblox.com/index.php/Machine_Requirements ToonPenguin (talk) 16:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
April 2009
Please, do not bite the newcomers (see here). If you see them do anything wrong, point it out correctly, or use the correct template (level 1 warnings to level four in the correct order). Thank you. Montgomery' 39 (talk) 17:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Huberia striata
Sorry, I missed that one. It's there now. Hope I'm not missing other ones as well :/ --Geronimo20 (talk) 21:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Section titles
Please see Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#Section_headings. Bubba73 (talk), 01:27, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
vandalism
im not vandalizing. im just an idiot who doesnt know how to use wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Starroller (talk • contribs) 02:43, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
I have declined your speedy on this article for a couple of reasons:
- Despite being tagged for "no content", there is in fact plenty of content in the article, having a full infobox, picture, etc. In fact, the A3 criteria specifically says "Similarly, this criterion doesn't cover a page with an infobox with non-trivial information".
- This was tagged less than one minute after being created, which is a bit bitey. It is not beyond the realms of possibility that the editor saved the infobox in and was planning to expand it further with subsequent edits. Tagging such potentially useful articles as soon as they pop up on newpages can mean that they end up not getting built and drive enthusiastic newbie editors away. Even when an article technically meets a CSD criteria (which this one didn't), it is usually a good idea to allow at least a few minutes before slapping a speedy tag on it.
Please feel free to ask any questions about this on my talkpage, and please be more careful in the future. Lankiveil (speak to me) 22:36, 19 April 2009 (UTC).
Carbonite.com
- This redirect was correct but the editor who created it just made an error by putting Carbonite (online backup instead of Carbonite (online backup). Please check any simple possible errors before adding a CSD tag. Best, Otisjimmy1 (talk) 02:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--GedUK 07:15, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--GedUK 22:04, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
re User talk:76.78.45.100
In response to your edit summary; It is the truth? I blocked them for 3 hours for the move, since I doubt a warning was going to effect them, and on the basis that the sanction was too short (I assumed they would abandon the ip address if they were unable to edit within the next 10 minutes) I didn't bother with a standard template. My message, in the lolcatz terminology, was sufficient and not bitey - so it may be read by a subsequent individual without getting worried about it. Obviously, I'm not going to revert you but I may have appreciated the query before you removed it. LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:40, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response. I would suggest that AGF should mean that my sysop bits need not have been a means of legitimising my edit - a quick review of the ip's block log would have determined if they were blocked (and by who). Once that is determined, then any query could be posted to clear up misunderstanding. My view is that if the only edit from an addy is a page move - and one involving a very high traffic page - then they are likely a sock intent on disruption, and process can be somewhat dispensed with.
- BTW, and I should have mentioned it earlier, that was fast work in reverting it in the first place. LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:53, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
You made a very convincing case for deletion in this discussion but unfortunately, with the exception of stifle's declined CSD:A7, only you were arguing for deletion. I would suggest waiting a few months and if the article doesn't improve try again. Consensus can change. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:18, 26 April 2009 (UTC)