Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
::So let me get this straight. You revert and edit with no prior discussion. You are told to discuss, you ignore it, and then you claim others are doing exactly what you are guilty of?--[[User:Moosh88|Moosh88]] ([[User talk:Moosh88|talk]]) 04:42, 7 April 2011 (UTC) |
::So let me get this straight. You revert and edit with no prior discussion. You are told to discuss, you ignore it, and then you claim others are doing exactly what you are guilty of?--[[User:Moosh88|Moosh88]] ([[User talk:Moosh88|talk]]) 04:42, 7 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::I only put photo. It is ridiculous to require discussion for photos. You have edited original information without prior discussion. --[[User:Verman1|Verman1]] ([[User talk:Verman1|talk]]) 08:35, 7 April 2011 (UTC) |
:::I only put photo. It is ridiculous to require discussion for photos. You have edited original information without prior discussion. --[[User:Verman1|Verman1]] ([[User talk:Verman1|talk]]) 08:35, 7 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
::::I think I understand why you are intimidating me with blocking while you keep silence on actions of opposite side (it is not first time you did this). I will just hope that more fair administrator will come up to this issue and will remove falsified armenian names in all Azerbaijan-related articles. Regards, --[[User:Verman1|Verman1]] ([[User talk:Verman1|talk]]) 12:39, 7 April 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:39, 7 April 2011
The Signpost: 21 March 2011
- WikiProject report: Medicpedia — WikiProject Medicine
- Features and admins: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: One closed case, one suspended case, and two other cases
- Technology report: What is: localisation?; the proposed "personal image filter" explained; and more in brief
Hi Golbez,
Just wanted to draw your attention to Tsitsernavank Monastery. Could you please take measures, so that no edit warring happens there.
Thanks, -- Ashot (talk) 08:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
Just wanted to know. If it is just to show Azerbaijan territory in Wikipedia as region of unrecognized country, which in reality occupied by neighbour country. If you think that it is right to do so, then I will regret for you and will leave Wikipedia.
Thanks, --User:Verman1 (talk)
- The problem is that you are supporting policy of occupation. If not, then why you think that Lachin is not in Azerbaijan? (You can find confirmation for this in every accepted map that you will find) As you see, you are encouraging other people to leave the project because of your prejudice against certain nation --Verman1 (talk) 17:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 March 2011
- News and notes: Berlin conference highlights relation between chapters and Foundation; annual report; brief news
- In the news: Sue Gardner interviewed; Imperial College student society launched; Indian languages; brief news
- WikiProject report: Linking with WikiProject Wikify
- Features and admins: Featured list milestone
- Arbitration report: New case opens; Monty Hall problem case closes – what does the decision tell us?
Religiously inflammatory remarks
Please do not make religiously inflammatory remarks in your edit summary again like "Climb down from your cross, it's cold down there". You don't know what beliefs I may or may not subscribe to, and I do not appreciate it, any more than I appreciate being reverted just for the sake of being reverted. Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 15:40, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- I don't know what your beliefs may or may not be either, but apparently it's one that's cool with psychoanalyzing other people in a very offensive way. Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 16:03, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 April 2011
- News and notes: 1 April activities; RIAA takedown notice; brief news
- Editor retention: Fighting the decline by restricting article creation?
- WikiProject report: Out of this world — WikiProject Solar System
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments, new case, proposed decision for Coanda case, and motion regarding CU/OS
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Nationalist vandalism/miscunduct
Hi Golbez,
At the moment I really don't know who else I can ask to have a look at what User:Verman1 does. Editing while discussion is ongoing, putting his version of the text and then asking administrator to protect the page and things like those are becoming a common practice.
You have an experience of dealing with nationalist vandals of both Armenian and Azeri origin and hence I assume you can handle this situation easily.
Thanks in advance,
-- Ashot (talk) 09:00, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
He, User:Verman1, is at it again. This time at the Lachin article. [1] As well as here 2010 Mardakert skirmishes. Please have a look.--Moosh88 (talk) 04:39, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Geographic names
Hi again, Just wanted to know, is publishing (or reverting to) internationally accepted geographical names in Wikipedia articles are regarded as vandalism? Thanks in advance, --Verman1 (talk) 16:26, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- Can you please have a glance to here? The user Moosh88 is clearly trying to revert pages without initial discussion. Regards, --Verman1 (talk) 03:37, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- So let me get this straight. You revert and edit with no prior discussion. You are told to discuss, you ignore it, and then you claim others are doing exactly what you are guilty of?--Moosh88 (talk) 04:42, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- I only put photo. It is ridiculous to require discussion for photos. You have edited original information without prior discussion. --Verman1 (talk) 08:35, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- I think I understand why you are intimidating me with blocking while you keep silence on actions of opposite side (it is not first time you did this). I will just hope that more fair administrator will come up to this issue and will remove falsified armenian names in all Azerbaijan-related articles. Regards, --Verman1 (talk) 12:39, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- I only put photo. It is ridiculous to require discussion for photos. You have edited original information without prior discussion. --Verman1 (talk) 08:35, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- So let me get this straight. You revert and edit with no prior discussion. You are told to discuss, you ignore it, and then you claim others are doing exactly what you are guilty of?--Moosh88 (talk) 04:42, 7 April 2011 (UTC)