→Adminship: uh |
→Adminship: Request for arbitration |
||
Line 170: | Line 170: | ||
Unless there are extenuating circumstances that I'm unaware of, I think you need to resign. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 14:55, 1 October 2009 (UTC) |
Unless there are extenuating circumstances that I'm unaware of, I think you need to resign. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 14:55, 1 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Um, what? What has adminship got to do with anything? '''[[User:Majorly|<span style="font-family:verdana; font-size:10pt; color:#6B8AB8">Majorly</span>]]''' [[User talk:Majorly#t|<span style="font-family:verdana; font-size:8pt; color:#6B8AB8">talk</span>]] 16:24, 1 October 2009 (UTC) |
:Um, what? What has adminship got to do with anything? '''[[User:Majorly|<span style="font-family:verdana; font-size:10pt; color:#6B8AB8">Majorly</span>]]''' [[User talk:Majorly#t|<span style="font-family:verdana; font-size:8pt; color:#6B8AB8">talk</span>]] 16:24, 1 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
==Request for arbitration== |
|||
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Administrators aiding a sock puppet at RFA]] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use— |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Requesting Arbitration]]; |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Arbitration guide]]. |
|||
Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice --> [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 16:30, 1 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:30, 1 October 2009
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC) HiWhy did you revert my edit? I removed the "For people named" 'cos I figured that with the {{otheruses}} directly beneath it, it was pretty redundant. 92.29.29.128 (talk) 19:56, 18 September 2009 (UTC) Prod and not speedy? You have got to be kidding.... – ukexpat (talk) 20:00, 18 September 2009 (UTC) Thank you......for blocking that troll. It could be anybody I've irritated in the past. There have been a few vaguely-similarly-named harassment accounts recently. I don't keep track of them. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 23:36, 18 September 2009 (UTC) Thank you......for indef'ing that harassment account. Also for removing Nimur's false charge of sockpuppetry, hence I don't have to accelerate it to ANI or someplace. His vision of the ref desk is rather different from mine, but I've tried to do better after a previous ANI discussion about it. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 00:44, 21 September 2009 (UTC) Thank you for explaining the reason of your edit. I could agree in general terms but in this case the rank of his leadership is quite unquestionable as he is considered by historians and informed people on par with Jean Moulin. I believe that N#2 in worst case qualifies for "a top lead[*]". Please take the time to check the links, especially from M. Douzou (#4) (in French) about the heroes that could qualify as N#1 for De Gaulle, where out of a very short list of 5, only these 2 would stand final screening. (with quite objective criteria). Would you propose something different, like a "senior leading member" ? In French they usually say "la haute résistance" to distinguish those top leaders from others less influential but using "High Resistance" would be probably inexpressive in English. Mpbb (talk) 21:48, 21 September 2009 (UTC) About the mopThank you for the nice note on my talk page. I'm honored that you would think of me as a potential admin. Unfortunately, I'm not up to the task at present due to off-wiki commitments. However, I may reconsider the matter next year. Is it OK if I contact you at that time for your advice? Cheers, Majoreditor (talk) 22:23, 22 September 2009 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:26, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Douglas CoeI reverted the edits you made to the article on Douglas Coe. The name of the group is in fact, "The Fellowship" not "The Family" as you changed it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EricLeFevre (talk • contribs) I apologize for not signing my post there, I was in a bit of a hurry. As for the article being called "The Family" I have no idea why. Every single source from major newspapers, (NBC, Newsweek, ect) refer to the organization as the fellowship. A guy named Jeff Sharlet wrote a book about it awhile ago and religiously referred to the group in question as "The Family," but he was actually talking about "The Fellowship." Why he would get the name of the group wrong is beyond me. Regardless, whoever wrote that article named the group incorrectly, so the name of the article needs to be changed, how to do that without breaking all the internal links I don't know. I don't think I even have the ability to change the articles name, it might be something an admin has to do. EricLeFevre (talk) 23:46, 23 September 2009 (UTC) Train stationActually, there are many, many articles about train stations in Wikipedia, mostly in the U.K. (can you say trainspotting? I knew you could!). Is there any reason not to have those for Indonesia, if we tolerate them for the U.K.? --Orange Mike | Talk 20:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC) Deletion review for Kristen McNamaraAn editor has asked for a deletion review of Kristen McNamara. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Facha93 (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2009 (UTC) Re: IRC PingYeah, I'm bad about updating that. I can't get on IRC at the moment (I'm in class) but I might be able to get on once I get out (about 45 minutes). If it's urgent, I should be able to respond to emails. Hersfold (t/a/c) 22:17, 28 September 2009 (UTC) steal your goalswhy did you delete this article? all the information contained was accurate, and the article was relevent since it is a part of these two bands history —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fantasyfan101 (talk • contribs) 16:58, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Jack DethPlease don't revert it. It's worth keeping. Plus, not every Trancers movie has a Wikipedia page yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.235.168.144 (talk) 23:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:43, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
LawlessnessIn view of what you said here I was hoping you might respond to the gist of what I said to Jayron32 here (you can get the gist in the second and third paragraphs). I don't think we've interacted much and possibly not at all, but I'll tell you that my jaw dropped a bit when I saw this comment: "...I determined that I felt sufficiently comfortable to place my trust in him once again by nominating him. I did purposefully leave out any mention of The_undertow in his RfA nomination; I wanted editors to judge him solely by his actions and edits as Law." Aside from the fact that you nominated him and wanted him to pass RfA, I'm curious as to where and when you feel you accrued the authority to knowingly misrepresent an RfA candidate's past to the community and act as arbiter of what Law would or would not be judged on. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 06:47, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Greg MowryWhy did you delete the page, Greg Mowry? Everything and all the information is and was correct. Greg did star in Starlight Express as Rusty on Broadway at the Gershwin Theatre from 1987 to 1989. The facts are documented on Broadwayworld.com and also on ibdb.com
AdminshipYou said, Yes, I was aware that The_undertow and Law are the same person. [1] Unless there are extenuating circumstances that I'm unaware of, I think you need to resign. Jehochman Talk 14:55, 1 October 2009 (UTC) Request for arbitrationYou are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Administrators aiding a sock puppet at RFA and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use— |