rm. Your talkpage is for other editors to communicate with you, not for you to post attacks. If you want admins to sanction or warn Tom N, please use Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. With evidence (diffs), of course. |
GingerBreadHarlot (talk | contribs) Undid revision 670519164 by Bishonen (talk) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Behavior that is unacceptable|delete or edit]] legitimate talk page comments, as you did at [[:Talk:The Holocaust]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. ''Editing another user's comments so as to change the meaning of what they said is strictly prohibited on Wikipedia. If you have something to say, make another comment of your own, rather than being disruptive''<!-- Template:uw-tpv3 --> [[User:Quinto Simmaco|Quinto Simmaco]] ([[User talk:Quinto Simmaco|talk]]) 02:44, 13 March 2015 (UTC) |
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Behavior that is unacceptable|delete or edit]] legitimate talk page comments, as you did at [[:Talk:The Holocaust]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. ''Editing another user's comments so as to change the meaning of what they said is strictly prohibited on Wikipedia. If you have something to say, make another comment of your own, rather than being disruptive''<!-- Template:uw-tpv3 --> [[User:Quinto Simmaco|Quinto Simmaco]] ([[User talk:Quinto Simmaco|talk]]) 02:44, 13 March 2015 (UTC) |
||
:::That was not intentional, that was accidental. [[User:GingerBreadHarlot|GingerBreadHarlot]] ([[User talk:GingerBreadHarlot#top|talk]]) 08:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC) |
:::That was not intentional, that was accidental. [[User:GingerBreadHarlot|GingerBreadHarlot]] ([[User talk:GingerBreadHarlot#top|talk]]) 08:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC) |
||
==Tom Northshoreman has a history of changing people's statements on the talk pages to serve his agenda, especially Leo Frank article== |
|||
Tom Northshoreman is an aggressive POV warrior who modifies the things people say on the talk pages of articles to keep a narrative that serves the political narrative and status quo to his personal liking. The Leo Frank talk page is a perfect example. Is there anyone that can stop him from this behavior of trying to control the POV narrative and his personal attacks against me. Do not delete text from my personal talk page, in the same way Tom changed / altered my text on the talk page of the Leo Frank article. This text is not to be removed. [[User:GingerBreadHarlot|GingerBreadHarlot]] ([[User talk:GingerBreadHarlot#top|talk]]) 16:08, 8 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== July 2015 == |
== July 2015 == |
||
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at [[:Kevin B. MacDonald]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-npov3 --> [[User:Doug Weller|Doug Weller]] ([[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]]) 12:28, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at [[:Kevin B. MacDonald]], you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-npov3 --> [[User:Doug Weller|Doug Weller]] ([[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]]) 12:28, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
||
Doug Weller, grow a spine. The long arc of this century indicates Wikipedia is both, at the same-time, a living organism and species of knowledge evolving into future time. Change is the only constant. Labeling people or articles/books people wrote with infantilized emotionally charged words like "anti-Semitism" and "Neo-Nazi", or *insert your shaming ad hominem label here* to suppress individuals or groups doesn't work anymore to chill dissent in the real world and all it does is instigate a loaded name calling contest that leads no where. When someone uses these emotionally laden words it usually means that someone or some group no longer has any good arguments (especially when the person is not advocating national socialism or hitler). The word "anti-Semitism", "anti-Semite" and Neo-Nazi are now recognized as keywords used to stifle dissent, differing opinions and to call "the other" a personal attack in the ugly game of fighting for who controls history. Using racial epithets, emotionally charged words, ad hominem attacks, personal attacks, infantilized red-herring is the equivalent of calling something "neo-Nazi", "anti-Semite" or smearing something with the racial epithet "anti-Semitism" because it criticizes something related to Jewish subjects. Basically anti-Semitism and neo-Nazi have become anti-Gentile racial epithets. Stop the anti-Gentile behavior. Stop the Anti-Gentilism. [[User:GingerBreadHarlot|GingerBreadHarlot]] ([[User talk:GingerBreadHarlot#top|talk]]) 16:08, 8 July 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:08, 8 July 2015
I am a fiery redhead. My user name was Pussy Pimples, but politically correct Wikipedia activists put that user name into dispute. I explained that pussy meant oozing, not vagina, but it was already too late as I had resurrected as Ginger Bread Harlot. Welcome to my Talk page, Happy New Year, January 2015. Let's make it a great year and a fresh start. GingerBreadHarlot (talk) 18:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
February 2015
Your recent edit to Holocaust denial appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 14:22, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Are you referring to my addition of Carlos Whitlock Porter to the list of Holocaust Deniers? C.W. Porter has written a number of high profile pseudo-scholarly and pseudo-historical works about the Holocaust being a fabrication of wartime propaganda. Please take a look at his web site http://www.cwporter.com/buy.htm "Made in Russia" which lists a number of his works translated to multiple languages. GingerBreadHarlot (talk) 16:36, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 08:40, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
March 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:The Holocaust, you may be blocked from editing. Editing another user's comments so as to change the meaning of what they said is strictly prohibited on Wikipedia. If you have something to say, make another comment of your own, rather than being disruptive Quinto Simmaco (talk) 02:44, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- That was not intentional, that was accidental. GingerBreadHarlot (talk) 08:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Tom Northshoreman has a history of changing people's statements on the talk pages to serve his agenda, especially Leo Frank article
Tom Northshoreman is an aggressive POV warrior who modifies the things people say on the talk pages of articles to keep a narrative that serves the political narrative and status quo to his personal liking. The Leo Frank talk page is a perfect example. Is there anyone that can stop him from this behavior of trying to control the POV narrative and his personal attacks against me. Do not delete text from my personal talk page, in the same way Tom changed / altered my text on the talk page of the Leo Frank article. This text is not to be removed. GingerBreadHarlot (talk) 16:08, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
July 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Kevin B. MacDonald, you may be blocked from editing. Doug Weller (talk) 12:28, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Doug Weller, grow a spine. The long arc of this century indicates Wikipedia is both, at the same-time, a living organism and species of knowledge evolving into future time. Change is the only constant. Labeling people or articles/books people wrote with infantilized emotionally charged words like "anti-Semitism" and "Neo-Nazi", or *insert your shaming ad hominem label here* to suppress individuals or groups doesn't work anymore to chill dissent in the real world and all it does is instigate a loaded name calling contest that leads no where. When someone uses these emotionally laden words it usually means that someone or some group no longer has any good arguments (especially when the person is not advocating national socialism or hitler). The word "anti-Semitism", "anti-Semite" and Neo-Nazi are now recognized as keywords used to stifle dissent, differing opinions and to call "the other" a personal attack in the ugly game of fighting for who controls history. Using racial epithets, emotionally charged words, ad hominem attacks, personal attacks, infantilized red-herring is the equivalent of calling something "neo-Nazi", "anti-Semite" or smearing something with the racial epithet "anti-Semitism" because it criticizes something related to Jewish subjects. Basically anti-Semitism and neo-Nazi have become anti-Gentile racial epithets. Stop the anti-Gentile behavior. Stop the Anti-Gentilism. GingerBreadHarlot (talk) 16:08, 8 July 2015 (UTC)