c |
Sam Blacketer (talk | contribs) →Blocked for incivility: new section |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: Chill, please? You do know that Theresa is an ex-arb, right? a just in case. Cheers, [[User:Jack Merridew|Jack Merridew]] 16:45, 13 December 2008 (UTC) |
: Chill, please? You do know that Theresa is an ex-arb, right? a just in case. Cheers, [[User:Jack Merridew|Jack Merridew]] 16:45, 13 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
:: Do you want me to protect this page to stop more comments? [[User talk:Caulde|<span style="color:#8B0000;font-weight:bold">Caulde</span>]] 16:51, 13 December 2008 (UTC) |
:: Do you want me to protect this page to stop more comments? [[User talk:Caulde|<span style="color:#8B0000;font-weight:bold">Caulde</span>]] 16:51, 13 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Blocked for incivility == |
|||
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] {{#if:72 hours|You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours'''|You have been '''temporarily [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing}} in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for {{#if:incivility, in violation of [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/IRC#Civility: Giano|your civility restriction]]|'''incivility, in violation of [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/IRC#Civility: Giano|your civility restriction]]'''|[[Wikipedia:Vandalism|abuse of editing privileges]]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make constructive contributions]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below, but you should read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. {{#if:|[[User:Sam Blacketer|Sam Blacketer]] ([[User talk:Sam Blacketer|talk]]) 18:54, 13 December 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 --> |
|||
While finding yourself as collateral damage in an autoblock is not a nice situation, you are still expected to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]]. Instead you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Giano_II&diff=prev&oldid=257677800 attacked] the administrator who had placed the block, absent any evidence that she could reasonably have forseen collateral damage. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Giano_II&diff=next&oldid=257678412 Further] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Giano_II&diff=next&oldid=257680388 personal] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Giano_II&diff=next&oldid=257680693 attacks] followed. While Teresa Knott should have obtained the consent of this Committee before blocking you, I find that her failure to do so was accidental and so her situation differs from that of SlimVirgin. |
|||
After Teresa's block was undone, you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theresa_knott&diff=prev&oldid=257688360 went] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Giano_II&diff=prev&oldid=257688885 after] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGiano_II&diff=257695483&oldid=257692799 her] in further violation of civility restrictions, and further [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=257695805 attacked Elonka] including without justification assuming that her block was "trolled". I note that you are quick to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Giano_II&diff=prev&oldid=257700111 detect] personal attacks on yourself; someone who knows what a personal attack on themselves is can be expected to know when they are making a personal attack on another user. |
|||
In accordance with [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Motion: re SlimVirgin#Restriction on further enforcement|the motion concerning enforcement]], the block was debated on the Arbitrator's mailing list and endorsed by a majority of the committee. The initial proposal of one week was moderated to 72 hours. Supporting arbitrators were Charles Matthews, Deskana, Fayssal F., FT2, Jpgordon, Kirill Lokshin, and myself. No arbitrator opposed. The following arbitrators did not express an opinion, or were away at the time of the debate: FloNight, Jdforrester, Morven, Newyorkbrad, Stephen Bain, YellowMonkey. |
|||
To verify the agreement of the committee please see [https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/private/arbcom-l/2008-December/023874.html this email] from Arbcom-l and the preceding thread (former arbitrators with access to the list may wish to give independent confirmation of the committee's consent). I suggest that any appeal be directed to the committee. [[User:Sam Blacketer|Sam Blacketer]] ([[User talk:Sam Blacketer|talk]]) 18:54, 13 December 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:54, 13 December 2008
Had enough of the bloody place - gone. Giano (talk) 16:32, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Ya don't seem the type, to pack'er in. Hope ya change your mind. GoodDay (talk) 16:33, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Chill, please? You do know that Theresa is an ex-arb, right? a just in case. Cheers, Jack Merridew 16:45, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Do you want me to protect this page to stop more comments? Caulde 16:51, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Blocked for incivility
While finding yourself as collateral damage in an autoblock is not a nice situation, you are still expected to assume good faith. Instead you attacked the administrator who had placed the block, absent any evidence that she could reasonably have forseen collateral damage. Further personal attacks followed. While Teresa Knott should have obtained the consent of this Committee before blocking you, I find that her failure to do so was accidental and so her situation differs from that of SlimVirgin.
After Teresa's block was undone, you went after her in further violation of civility restrictions, and further attacked Elonka including without justification assuming that her block was "trolled". I note that you are quick to detect personal attacks on yourself; someone who knows what a personal attack on themselves is can be expected to know when they are making a personal attack on another user.
In accordance with the motion concerning enforcement, the block was debated on the Arbitrator's mailing list and endorsed by a majority of the committee. The initial proposal of one week was moderated to 72 hours. Supporting arbitrators were Charles Matthews, Deskana, Fayssal F., FT2, Jpgordon, Kirill Lokshin, and myself. No arbitrator opposed. The following arbitrators did not express an opinion, or were away at the time of the debate: FloNight, Jdforrester, Morven, Newyorkbrad, Stephen Bain, YellowMonkey.
To verify the agreement of the committee please see this email from Arbcom-l and the preceding thread (former arbitrators with access to the list may wish to give independent confirmation of the committee's consent). I suggest that any appeal be directed to the committee. Sam Blacketer (talk) 18:54, 13 December 2008 (UTC)