Gerda Arendt (talk | contribs) combine |
→Thank you: new section |
||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
:: Thank you, also to you, - I hope you saw mine on top of this page. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt#top|talk]]) 07:00, 1 January 2017 (UTC) |
:: Thank you, also to you, - I hope you saw mine on top of this page. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt#top|talk]]) 07:00, 1 January 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Thank you == |
|||
Thank you for the positive comments at the AI thread. Hard spot for anyone to speak up when a gang of editors are attacking someone....thanks. All my fault I took the bait. I really don't see a point in commenting anymore as they don't seem to care about accessibility dispite studies and reader after reader saying something. I will still have fun watching these guys scrabble all the time this comes up. It's to bad and funny because most of them are great editors. I spoke up about every 3 months or so...but think things are personal between me and Cass now..thus think it's best to let others deal with his odd inflamitory attitude. --[[User:Moxy|Moxy]] ([[User talk:Moxy|talk]]) 18:53, 1 January 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:53, 1 January 2017
sing peace | |
---|---|
2017 is the year of the reformation. |
Archive of 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · blushing
Good advice
I'm cleverest! --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:35, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
- Clever enough to listen, the greatest gift! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:37, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Mirjam Wiesemann
On 29 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mirjam Wiesemann, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mirjam Wiesemann made award-winning audiobooks for Cybele Records, introducing in music and conversation the composers Hartmann, Apostel, Henze, Boulez, Jacqueline Fontyn and Juan Allende-Blin? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mirjam Wiesemann. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mirjam Wiesemann), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Pseudo-Jacquemart
On 31 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pseudo-Jacquemart, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the name Pseudo-Jacquemart was assigned to the anonymous master illuminator (work pictured) for his collaboration with Jacquemart de Hesdin? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pseudo-Jacquemart. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Happy Hogmanay!
Happy Hogmanay! | ||
Wishing you and yours a Happy Hogmanay. May the year ahead be productive and harmonious. --John (talk) 21:22, 31 December 2016 (UTC) |
- Thank you, you took a nice photo! How do you like the one I took? Best wishes for 2017! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:33, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Gerda Arendt!
- Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Also from
- Codename Lisa (talk) 07:09, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
- Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 13:07, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you, also to you, - I hope you saw mine on top of this page. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:00, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for the positive comments at the AI thread. Hard spot for anyone to speak up when a gang of editors are attacking someone....thanks. All my fault I took the bait. I really don't see a point in commenting anymore as they don't seem to care about accessibility dispite studies and reader after reader saying something. I will still have fun watching these guys scrabble all the time this comes up. It's to bad and funny because most of them are great editors. I spoke up about every 3 months or so...but think things are personal between me and Cass now..thus think it's best to let others deal with his odd inflamitory attitude. --Moxy (talk) 18:53, 1 January 2017 (UTC)