→April 2019: new section |
Second warning. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your [[Special:Contributions/Gaylordbush69|recent edits]] appear to be [[WP:POINT|intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point]]. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally [[Wikipedia:Reasonability_Rule|unpopular]] way, are highly [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive]] and can lead to a [[WP:BLOCK|block]] or [[WP:BAN|ban]]. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through [[WP:DISPUTE|dispute resolution]]. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-point --> [[User:Jingiby|Jingiby]] ([[User talk:Jingiby|talk]]) 03:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC) |
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your [[Special:Contributions/Gaylordbush69|recent edits]] appear to be [[WP:POINT|intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point]]. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally [[Wikipedia:Reasonability_Rule|unpopular]] way, are highly [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive]] and can lead to a [[WP:BLOCK|block]] or [[WP:BAN|ban]]. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through [[WP:DISPUTE|dispute resolution]]. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-point --> [[User:Jingiby|Jingiby]] ([[User talk:Jingiby|talk]]) 03:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC) |
||
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. |
|||
* If you are engaged in an article [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|content dispute]] with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the [[:Help:Talk pages|article's talk page]], and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] page, and ask for independent help at one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution#Ask for help at a relevant noticeboard|relevant notice boards]]. |
|||
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents|Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]]. |
|||
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> [[User:Jingiby|Jingiby]] ([[User talk:Jingiby|talk]]) 18:47, 11 April 2019 (UTC) |
|||
==Sockpuppet investigation== |
|||
{{bots|deny=HostBot}} |
|||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
|An editor has opened an investigation into [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sockpuppetry]] by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anti political shills]], where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|the guide to responding to investigations]], and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you ''have'' been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.{{#if:| [[User:Woshiyiweizhongguoren|<b style="color:#00205B">Woshiyiwei</b><b style="color:#0077C0">zhongguo</b><b style="color:#00205B">ren</b>]] ([[User talk:Woshiyiweizhongguoren|<b style="color:#0077C0">🇨🇳</b>]]) 13:20, 10 April 2019 (UTC)}} |
|||
|[[File:Puppeter template.svg|40px|center|link=|alt=]] |
|||
}} [[User:Woshiyiweizhongguoren|<b style="color:#00205B">Woshiyiwei</b><b style="color:#0077C0">zhongguo</b><b style="color:#00205B">ren</b>]] ([[User talk:Woshiyiweizhongguoren|<b style="color:#0077C0">🇨🇳</b>]]) 13:20, 10 April 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:47, 11 April 2019
April 2019
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 03:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk) 18:47, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anti political shills, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 13:20, 10 April 2019 (UTC)