SummerPhDv2.0 (talk | contribs) →Your editing history: new section |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> |
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> |
||
:--[[User:Jorm|Jorm]] ([[User talk:Jorm|talk]]) 22:44, 1 June 2019 (UTC) |
:--[[User:Jorm|Jorm]] ([[User talk:Jorm|talk]]) 22:44, 1 June 2019 (UTC) |
||
== Your editing history == |
|||
On [[Talk:Men Going Their Own Way]], you said I had misrepresented your edit history. To ensure we are both abundantly clear on that, here is a summary: |
|||
You edited a mix of articles from 2010 to 2014, when you went silent for about a year and came back with a series of edits to Gamergate and feminism related articles lasting for a couple of weeks in March 2015, until the discussion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement, leading to a 48 hour block.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive168#Galestar] Your immediate return to the problem area (and socking) then lead to a 12 month topic ban.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive169#Galestar] Banned from gender controversies, you disappeared for 1 year 2 months. |
|||
You edited a bit in June 2016 and January 2017 (leading to a block for a day for edit warring and then a week for socking) before returning to Gamergate topics in August 2018. A notice was given to you of the discretionary sanctions on Gamergate and gender-related articles and you disappeared for 9 months. |
|||
You resurfaced here on June 1, 2019 (after a call on Reddit for meat puppets to dispute the sentence you are disputing) where this gender-conflict article has been pretty much the sole subject of your attention. You clearly are aware that the discretionary sanctions apply to you and should have some sense that you are testing the boundaries. |
|||
Are we clear? - <span style="color:#D70270;background-color:white;">Sum</span><span style="color:#734F96;background-color:white;">mer</span><span style="color:#0038A8;background-color:white;">PhD</span><sup>[[User talk:SummerPhDv2.0|v2.0]]</sup> 05:59, 2 June 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:59, 2 June 2019
May 2019
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Your editing history
On Talk:Men Going Their Own Way, you said I had misrepresented your edit history. To ensure we are both abundantly clear on that, here is a summary:
You edited a mix of articles from 2010 to 2014, when you went silent for about a year and came back with a series of edits to Gamergate and feminism related articles lasting for a couple of weeks in March 2015, until the discussion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement, leading to a 48 hour block.[1] Your immediate return to the problem area (and socking) then lead to a 12 month topic ban.[2] Banned from gender controversies, you disappeared for 1 year 2 months.
You edited a bit in June 2016 and January 2017 (leading to a block for a day for edit warring and then a week for socking) before returning to Gamergate topics in August 2018. A notice was given to you of the discretionary sanctions on Gamergate and gender-related articles and you disappeared for 9 months.
You resurfaced here on June 1, 2019 (after a call on Reddit for meat puppets to dispute the sentence you are disputing) where this gender-conflict article has been pretty much the sole subject of your attention. You clearly are aware that the discretionary sanctions apply to you and should have some sense that you are testing the boundaries.
Are we clear? - SummerPhDv2.0 05:59, 2 June 2019 (UTC)