GabiloveAdol (talk | contribs) m →NOR |
EthiopianHabesha (talk | contribs) →Parphrasing out of context: new section |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
[[User:Soupforone|Soupforone]] I got send to the wrong place, one volunteer refered me to arbitration, so i did. Then another from the Oversight team said, i will have to fill in a form regarding supression/revision delete, so i'm going to do that. [[User:GabiloveAdol|GabiloveAdol]] ([[User talk:GabiloveAdol#top|talk]]) 08:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC) |
[[User:Soupforone|Soupforone]] I got send to the wrong place, one volunteer refered me to arbitration, so i did. Then another from the Oversight team said, i will have to fill in a form regarding supression/revision delete, so i'm going to do that. [[User:GabiloveAdol|GabiloveAdol]] ([[User talk:GabiloveAdol#top|talk]]) 08:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Parphrasing out of context == |
|||
@GabiloveAdol, @[[User:Soupforone|Soupforone]] please see [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive_Editor_on_Ethiopia_related_pages admin notice board] me explaining regarding to one case MS Sarah deliberately paraphrasing out of context. — [[User:EthiopianHabesha|EthiopianHabesha]] ([[User talk:EthiopianHabesha|talk]]) 15:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:19, 17 January 2017
Welcome!
Hello, GabiloveAdol, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Soupforone (talk) 03:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Soupforone Thank you! GabiloveAdol (talk) 04:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
@GabiloveAdol: As an IP account @86.89.46.70 and now this account, by your own self admission, you have edited Amhara people article. You have repeatedly disrupted that wikipedia article by deleting sources and sourced content. You did this again in last 24 hours, even after the due discussion on the Talk:Amhara people page, and explanation by admin @Buckshot06: few days ago. Please do not so, as such behavior is disruptive to the goals of wikipedia. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 13:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Ms Sarah Welch Are you threatening me? You know the policies so well but when your wrong you don't like to admit it, that's just sad Sarah. Thanks for the warning, but as soon as i figure out those diffs, i will be displaying everything. GabiloveAdol (talk) 13:25, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- As the edits by Sjo have already shown, a source does not have to be accessible online in order to be cited. You have also now made a completely unjustified WP:Personal Attack on Sarah Welch. Do not twist policies in order to make personal attacks: Wikipedia is WP:NOTAFORUM. Take this as a first warning; any two more (a) twisting of policies again, or (b) personal attacks, will result in administrator action (initially a short block). Kind regards Buckshot06 (talk) 08:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
NOR
Greetings GabiloveAdol! While I can understand and appreciate your frustration, please note that per WP:DR, arbitration is not for content disputes. It's also an absolute last resort after all of the various other dispute resolution processes have been attempted. Thus far, only talk page and fringe board discussion have taken place, so this filing will almost certainly be rejected. I therefore suggest you retract the filing and instead post a query on the no original research noticeboard regarding the stuff on the Amhara, Shewa, Dawaro and Fatagar provinces. Explain there, with direct links to Pankhurst and Braukämper, that they are discussing expeditions in old provinces, not population-specific raids. This is pretty obvious original research (synthesis), so it will in all likelihood be identified as such. Doing so will only make this official, after which point we can clean up that o/r as well as the already confirmed fringe phrase. Kind Regards-- Soupforone (talk) 03:34, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Soupforone I already emailed with 'The English Wikipedia Oversight team' and that's where they refer me too. Since October 2016 the history section has been gutted in halve and those two sections has been added, 2/3 of the history section is about slavery and social stratification, it's defamatory to a group, it misrepresents and it's no longer a neutral article. There are other things i discussed with the Oversight team which i will further elaborate. So it won't remove it. See you there Sincerely GabiloveAdol (talk) 03:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- It's unusual that the oversight folks would recommend that since most of the wikitext is either pretty obvious fringe, synthesis or undue (almost laughably so vis-a-vis the provinces). Anyway, I must reiterate that the filing (which is a long, drawn-out process; not at all time-sensitive btw) will almost certainly be rejected since other steps (plural) in the dispute resolution have not been tried. Please retract it, as it will only serve to prolong the content dispute. To quickly resolve the issue, ask EthiopianHabesha to instead formalize his slavery proposal on the talk page into an RFC question. It won't be difficult to establish that there is no consensus for the fringe/synthesis/undue stuff. I've also queried on the no original research noticeboard whether the sultanate expeditions in the old provinces are synth [1]. Kind Regards-- Soupforone (talk) 05:07, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Soupforone I got send to the wrong place, one volunteer refered me to arbitration, so i did. Then another from the Oversight team said, i will have to fill in a form regarding supression/revision delete, so i'm going to do that. GabiloveAdol (talk) 08:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Parphrasing out of context
@GabiloveAdol, @Soupforone please see admin notice board me explaining regarding to one case MS Sarah deliberately paraphrasing out of context. — EthiopianHabesha (talk) 15:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)