Reverted to revision 563384083 by GSK: GSK is making a lot of TW mistakes today.. (TW) |
Vanished87817173 (talk | contribs) →July 2013: new section |
||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
:Amazon isn't a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. '''Everything added to Wikipedia needs a reliable source.''' I reverted your changes originally because you did not include one. I see your changes were reverted again by another editor, possibly because Amazon isn't considered reliable. If you can find a reliable website that covers the product as a review, or announcement, or whatever, use that instead. Reliable websites are ones like Ars Technica, EA themselves, Polygon, Kotaku, and the list goes on. <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:GSK|GSK]]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:GSK|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/GSK|✓]]</span> 15:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC) |
:Amazon isn't a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. '''Everything added to Wikipedia needs a reliable source.''' I reverted your changes originally because you did not include one. I see your changes were reverted again by another editor, possibly because Amazon isn't considered reliable. If you can find a reliable website that covers the product as a review, or announcement, or whatever, use that instead. Reliable websites are ones like Ars Technica, EA themselves, Polygon, Kotaku, and the list goes on. <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:GSK|GSK]]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:GSK|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/GSK|✓]]</span> 15:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC) |
||
== July 2013 == |
|||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Archcaster|Archcaster]]. I noticed that you made a comment on the page [[:Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Reviewer]] that didn't seem very [[Wikipedia:Civility|civil]], so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Archcaster|my talk page]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-npa1 --> --<span style="font-family: 'Segoe UI', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; text-shadow: 2px 2px 10px rgba(0,0,0,1); color: green;"><font color="green">[[User:Archcaster|拱連鑄機]]</font></span> 20:16, 8 July 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:16, 8 July 2013
|
||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
EA Games F1C Challenge edition.
Hello again. Please, can you tell me, why in this post http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EA_Sports_F1_series, Juanma can edit and put links to a mod of the game, and I was banned to do the same?
Can you tell me how to erase my account in Wikipedia, because I think are not the same rules for all?
Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jalnervion (talk • contribs) 19:56, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- You have not been blocked. JuanMaMaster was blocked for a period of time, and I believe that blocked has since expired. However, if you really want to leave Wikipedia, then all you need to do is just leave. You can request an administrator to "vanish" your account, but you need to read this entire article first. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 01:01, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
I think indeed that you made a mistake, the link toward a CC-by-sa graphic scheme sumarizing the Google Glass technology seems quite relevant. Yug (talk) 17:02, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thanks for your work
Hello GSK. Thank you for your efforts regarding the edit war at the Bobs Burger article. IMO the RFPP decline was ill advised at best and I have noted it as such. I know how time consuming filing at the edit war page is and you had to do two of them so I just wanted to leave a note of appreciation for your efforts. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 01:26, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment + Active Worlds
hello, you may wish to know that I have commented on your post at the Administrator's incident noticeboard.
i am also concerned about the reversion of User:Intelligent Deathclaw's edits (which i have just seen now have been undone, hmm). in principle, i disagree that Intelligent Deathclaw's edits should have been made under the influence of WP:COI, however at the same time I feel his edits were not without merit. a lot of content and references edited out had referenced the ActiveWiki, which based on personal experience, is not a reliable source. I had experienced the same issue with User:Roy Curtis/Cloud Party, which resulted in a speedy delete.
i would say the removal should be kept, although perhaps they were too sweeping based on emotions admitted by Intelligent Deathclaw. should a third party be invited to look at this? -- Roy Curtis (talk) 03:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Probably. I think Deathclaw has too much of a COI to be further involved with the article. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 03:46, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- I think we both have too much of a COI to be further involved. Intelligent Deathclaw (talk) 03:48, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- I hate to bring it up again, but I wasn't the one with an agenda and a vendetta. I'm willing to WP:FORGIVE, but there are some things I can't forget easily. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 03:50, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Are you saying I'm the only one with a COI? I've looked up your edits to the article and even beyond Wikipedia. You do share an interesting history with AW, to say the least. Intelligent Deathclaw (talk) 03:58, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't say you're the only one with a COI. In fact, I even acknowledged my COI on the nomination. Yes, my history with AW is interesting. I'm not sure why it's your concern. But if you want to reveal things, be my guest: what username did your father go by in AW? I'd love to know. Really though, I would. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 04:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- When I said he worked for tech support, I should have said he was just like the stereotypical Indian sitting at a desk answering phone calls and reading answers from an official guidebook, minus being Indian of course. If he did have a citizen account, which I don't think he did, he would use the username he used on everything else: MaskedMan. Intelligent Deathclaw (talk) 04:13, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't say you're the only one with a COI. In fact, I even acknowledged my COI on the nomination. Yes, my history with AW is interesting. I'm not sure why it's your concern. But if you want to reveal things, be my guest: what username did your father go by in AW? I'd love to know. Really though, I would. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 04:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Are you saying I'm the only one with a COI? I've looked up your edits to the article and even beyond Wikipedia. You do share an interesting history with AW, to say the least. Intelligent Deathclaw (talk) 03:58, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- I hate to bring it up again, but I wasn't the one with an agenda and a vendetta. I'm willing to WP:FORGIVE, but there are some things I can't forget easily. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 03:50, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- I think we both have too much of a COI to be further involved. Intelligent Deathclaw (talk) 03:48, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
here is a probleme you deleted my addition here a good proof that its real.
http://www.amazon.fr/The-Sims-starter-bundle-anglais/dp/B00COK9VD6/ref=sr_1_fkmr1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1373270555&sr=8-2-fkmr1&keywords=the+sims+3+starter+pack explaine me why me i have to proof what say and others didnt why my addition had to have a citation or refference when its in store and yet other like univercity or supernatural they doesnt have to have one ?????? that is just wrong to delete others work just cause you dont want some one to post something cause you didn thave the proof like others did.
i realy dont understand some people can add stuff with out like you call it a "Reliable source" but others has to prove them????
if i post somthing cause its real not fake information . so ou know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lboken (talk • contribs)
- Amazon isn't a reliable source. Everything added to Wikipedia needs a reliable source. I reverted your changes originally because you did not include one. I see your changes were reverted again by another editor, possibly because Amazon isn't considered reliable. If you can find a reliable website that covers the product as a review, or announcement, or whatever, use that instead. Reliable websites are ones like Ars Technica, EA themselves, Polygon, Kotaku, and the list goes on. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 15:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
July 2013
Hello, I'm Archcaster. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Reviewer that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --拱連鑄機 20:16, 8 July 2013 (UTC)