Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,Newyorkbrad 18:15, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Battle of Jenin
I know that this now may make it look like an exhortation to gang up and help each other in the editing process - but I did just want to say thank you for (unintentionally) making me feel today that I am not alone or mad when it comes to dealing with this crazy article and some of the people who seem to think they have taken charge of it and seem impervious to any rational debate, or statement of the obvious, which happens to contradict their own deeply held beliefs. And to think I only started here (anonymously under an old IP address) editing out typos in film articles. Btw I have also posted this on Nwe's talk page --Nickhh 19:47, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Archiving
Madam, I thought I would save you the trouble of archiving.:)) Palestine forgotten 15:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, but you buried my barnstars! I'm not too proud to admit I'm proud of them things.--G-Dett 16:07, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Silly of me. going to fix it now. Palestine forgotten 16:19, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Is that ok now? I actually lifted that panel on top from a guy. Palestine forgotten 16:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hell yes Palestine forgotten! All clustered together like that now I'm super proud.--G-Dett 21:50, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Is that ok now? I actually lifted that panel on top from a guy. Palestine forgotten 16:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Silly of me. going to fix it now. Palestine forgotten 16:19, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Arbitration notice
It appears that I inadverently placed the notice of the arbitration case (which someone has moved now) on your userpage rather than your talkpage. Sorry about that. Newyorkbrad 16:20, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Your view requested
You might be interested in my comments at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid/Workshop#Injunction. Would you say that was a fair summary of the "clique" problem? -- ChrisO 00:12, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Battle of Jenin - WP:NPA
i thought it over and decided that these escalating comments of yours, in which you state that:
- I need to understand that my "sophistries" won't fly with you. and that you will "explode them" every time, and that every time you will "explode them" my credibility takes a hit.[1]
- I need to significantly raise the pitch of my discussion if I want to be taken seriously on the page[2],
are a tad too personal. i request you go over WP:CIV and WP:NPA and avoid such statements in the future and stick to the talk issues rather than make things personal.
i note that to your first "explode them" comment i already asked you to take a step back and noted to you that i have no interest in personal conflicts.[3] JaakobouChalk Talk 21:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
3RR note: i'v now noticed that this revert (on 16:23, 16 August) of yours was the 6th edit in the span of 24hrs. i don't plan on reporting this, but i suggest you stick to the rules and avoid edit wars. JaakobouChalk Talk 22:46, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- I count five but your point stands, and I apologize.--G-Dett 23:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to [[Template:Highssp]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.Template:Do not delete
comment - i hope this is just my own paranoya and not an intentional and blunt breach of protocols. JaakobouChalk Talk 02:21, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Made the change you requested
I trusted your assertions, as I didn't have time to check. I would, however, appreciate it if you could delete the comment you made on my section about the DRV (as it doesn't seem relevant); and more generally if you could just try a less strident and accusatory tone. I've read through your various contributions, and you make good points (even if we don't always agree), but if you don't mind a bit of feedback, you'll seem a lot less partisan if you a) tone down the rhetoric a bit, and b) accept that we can all have honest disagreements. --Leifern 15:47, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
martyrs capital
please note this discussion - Talk:Battle_of_Jenin#martyrs.27_capital - and consider changing your last edit. btw, i've had another couple sources for this, but i did not keep them since i figured the BBC reference was good enough. JaakobouChalk Talk 20:29, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for looking out for me
I really appreciated your comments at the 3RR here. As usual, you did your homework and presented the case much better than I could have. I just wanted to say thanks. Tiamat 14:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Allegations of apartheid
Due to your interest in the Allegations of apartheid article I think you may be interested in this proposal Talk:Allegations_of_apartheid#Proposed_Move. Lothar of the Hill People 19:25, 21 August 2007 (UTC)