MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Robot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 14d) to User talk:FutureTrillionaire/Archive 2. |
→ARBPIA notice: new section |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
Hi. You might wanna check it out a bit carefully. Hyphen placement varies. I don't know the details, but country affects it for instance. Mr Stephen is rather expert at it, and may be right. --[[User:Stfg|Stfg]] ([[User talk:Stfg|talk]]) 23:47, 3 July 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. You might wanna check it out a bit carefully. Hyphen placement varies. I don't know the details, but country affects it for instance. Mr Stephen is rather expert at it, and may be right. --[[User:Stfg|Stfg]] ([[User talk:Stfg|talk]]) 23:47, 3 July 2013 (UTC) |
||
:Okay, I've started a talk page discussion to get this sorted out.--[[User:FutureTrillionaire|FutureTrillionaire]] ([[User talk:FutureTrillionaire#top|talk]]) 23:53, 3 July 2013 (UTC) |
:Okay, I've started a talk page discussion to get this sorted out.--[[User:FutureTrillionaire|FutureTrillionaire]] ([[User talk:FutureTrillionaire#top|talk]]) 23:53, 3 July 2013 (UTC) |
||
== ARBPIA notice == |
|||
As a result of [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles|an arbitration case]], the [[WP:AC|Arbitration Committee]] has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Area of conflict|Palestinian-Israeli conflict]], broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|editing restrictions]], described [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Discretionary sanctions|here]] and below. |
|||
*Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. |
|||
*The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. |
|||
*Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines. |
|||
*Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently [[WP:AE]]), or the Committee. |
|||
These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions. |
|||
Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary. |
|||
This notice is only effective if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Palestine-Israel_articles#Log_of_notifications|here]].--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 01:41, 6 July 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:41, 6 July 2013
Hezbollah casualties
Future, I do not think we should include the 1,000 claimed casualties by the Israeli minister for multiple reasons. First, the claim came from an Israeli government source, the Israeli defense minister, and considering the hostile nature between Israel and Syria I don't think he can be counted as a reliable source. Second, SOHR (which has been proven reliable in the past) has put out a figure which is for the most part consistent with the number of Hezbollah deaths documented by an Israeli non-government independent research group and with a claim that Hezbollah itself has stated on how many of their fighters have died. So we should stick to what has been verified/documented by reliable or semi-reliable and independent sources, and to what for now seems consistent. Third, up until now we have not included figures on potential wounded in the conflict and have included only figures on the number of confirmed or semi-confirmed killed. EkoGraf (talk) 16:32, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Potential RFC/U
I am interested in opening an WP:RFC/USER on the conduct of User:Baboon43 due to long running issues of incivility and edit warring. Back in March, you contacted the user in an attempt to resolve a dispute. Per Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/User_conduct/Guidance#Qualification, I would like to ask you to consider endorsing the RFC/U; you may view it at my sandbox. If you agree, you have my consent to make changes to my sandbox as needed so that this RFC/U can be filed properly. It is my hope that this community effort will encourage the user to reevaluate his approach. MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:29, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- The RFC/U has finally been opened at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Baboon43. I'm just letting you know since you did certify the dispute and might want to watch how it progresses. MezzoMezzo (talk) 12:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Bibleref2
Greetings Sibling in Christ. I appreciate your Christian witness on your Home Page. It certainly coordinates well with the very polite and sensitive nature of your Talk postings. Having been a professor most of my professional life, I greet you also as an acadème as well. Thank you for your careful and multitudinous edits to the "Jesus" article. You have made very significant contributions indeed.
While I attempted to explain my rationale about Bibleref2 on the article's Talk page, I neglected to mention the fact that when a user clicks on any Bibleref2 reference, they have instant access to many translations, including display of parallel translations. The default is NIV, but ASV is an available choice. (You most likely already know that, but it is an important advantage IMHO.)
Since I am out of the country on vacation, I have edits to the "Jesus" article on my to-do list. I have very limited access to the Internet, and would like to make best use of these leisure days. Therefore, I will proceed with the laborious replacements of the Bible citations, hoping that I do not offend you, for that is the farthest thing from my intent.
My pledge to you is this: if you object to the replacements I make to the template calls (and I do ask that you share with me any objections to my changes), I will go back and undo them since I am proceeding without your consent. This is because time is somewhat of the essence with me for the reasons I outlined above.
Out of personal interest, I am wondering what is your major and intended vocation. You write so well and certainly have a knack for research. Your additions to the Islamic belief section show an understanding and depth that frankly are amazing. Your brother in Him, Afaprof01 (talk) 01:57, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
- @Afaprof01: Okay. You can go ahead if you want. I'm trying to get this article to FAC hopefully within a month, and I'm concerned that someone at FAC might bring up copyright issues concerning the bible quotations. I guess let's just hope that won't happen.
- As for my academic studies, I'm a chemistry major, thinking about going to medical school after college. However, I'm interested in a wide variety of topics, including religion. And yes, I find it fascinating how other religious groups view Jesus. Thanks for asking :)--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 02:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
I moved the rest of the discussion to Talk:Jesus. Discussions about major changes to the article belongs there, so other editors can voice their opinion as well.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 23:03, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Pass a Method
The user Pass a Method continues to cause me trouble for no reason too and deletes all the content. I noticed that he has been doing the same with you. What has be been doing with you --Johnleeds1 (talk) 21:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- @Johnleeds1: I actually haven't encountered him in a while. If he keeps removing the contents you add, just undo his edits. Then, start a discussion at the article talk page. If that doesn't help, take the issue to WP:DRN.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 22:04, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks--Johnleeds1 (talk) 21:01, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
ISBNs
Hi. You might wanna check it out a bit carefully. Hyphen placement varies. I don't know the details, but country affects it for instance. Mr Stephen is rather expert at it, and may be right. --Stfg (talk) 23:47, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, I've started a talk page discussion to get this sorted out.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 23:53, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
ARBPIA notice
As a result of an arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.
- Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
- The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
- Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
- Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.
These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.
Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.
This notice is only effective if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged here.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:41, 6 July 2013 (UTC)