Freestylefrappe (talk | contribs) warning to morons |
Your request Re:RfC |
||
Line 10:
If you violate the above stipulations I shall mock you/'''dishonor your familial dynasty''' with the test1 template. Further violations shall result in the posting of the test2, test3, and test4 templates. This is ''sooo'' not a joke.
== Your request Re:RfC ==
The RfC is a bit disorganized as to what exactly it's about. My intention was to claim that I had tried to explain to you how your block of Stephenj was incorrect, and how you misunderstood your powers/responsibilities as an admin, and you had ignored me. I admit it was a judgement call, where exactly to sign my name, but I also think it doesn't matter much.
As I'm sure you know, an RfC isn't a trial or a collection of people out to get you. Rather than worrying about procedural issues, you might do better to treat what you can as constructive criticism. It can't do anything other than that anyway. -- [[User:SCZenz|SCZenz]] 05:09, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
|
Revision as of 05:09, 23 December 2005
- DO NOT THANK ME for an RFA I voted on
- DO NOT ENGAGE IN THE FOLLOWING...
- cruel and unusual punishment
- involvement in private conversations - dont jump in if you aren't involved in the article or topic in question, start a new section
- personal attacks towards any user
- stupid/moronic comments
If you violate the above stipulations I shall mock you/dishonor your familial dynasty with the test1 template. Further violations shall result in the posting of the test2, test3, and test4 templates. This is sooo not a joke.
Your request Re:RfC
The RfC is a bit disorganized as to what exactly it's about. My intention was to claim that I had tried to explain to you how your block of Stephenj was incorrect, and how you misunderstood your powers/responsibilities as an admin, and you had ignored me. I admit it was a judgement call, where exactly to sign my name, but I also think it doesn't matter much.
As I'm sure you know, an RfC isn't a trial or a collection of people out to get you. Rather than worrying about procedural issues, you might do better to treat what you can as constructive criticism. It can't do anything other than that anyway. -- SCZenz 05:09, 23 December 2005 (UTC)