Codename Lisa (talk | contribs) |
Codename Lisa (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Tendentious, really?[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_The_Big_Bang_Theory_characters&curid=16709386&diff=629011938&oldid=628906176] Tendentious is reverting a valid correction that would be made by any of the automated tools - Reflinks, AWB etc. As for your bogus claim about coming to my talk page "in peace", you attacked me on the page and were called out for it by another editor.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAussieLegend&diff=624631442&oldid=624630325][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AussieLegend&diff=prev&oldid=624964355] You need to stop being so confrontational. It's caused you no end of trouble in the past,[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3AFleetCommand] and likely will continue to do so in the future. --[[User:AussieLegend|'''<span style="color:green;">Aussie</span><span style="color:gold;">Legend</span>''']] ([[User talk:AussieLegend#top|<big>✉</big>]]) 07:26, 10 October 2014 (UTC) |
Tendentious, really?[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_The_Big_Bang_Theory_characters&curid=16709386&diff=629011938&oldid=628906176] Tendentious is reverting a valid correction that would be made by any of the automated tools - Reflinks, AWB etc. As for your bogus claim about coming to my talk page "in peace", you attacked me on the page and were called out for it by another editor.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAussieLegend&diff=624631442&oldid=624630325][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AussieLegend&diff=prev&oldid=624964355] You need to stop being so confrontational. It's caused you no end of trouble in the past,[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3AFleetCommand] and likely will continue to do so in the future. --[[User:AussieLegend|'''<span style="color:green;">Aussie</span><span style="color:gold;">Legend</span>''']] ([[User talk:AussieLegend#top|<big>✉</big>]]) 07:26, 10 October 2014 (UTC) |
||
:{{tps}} |
|||
:Hello, guys. I am here to have a word with both you. |
:Hello, guys. I am here to have a word with both you. |
||
:I've been watching you both for a while now and this has gone long enough. Per [[WP:NOTBROKEN]], both {{tl|Official}} and {{tl|Official website}} are okay but "fixed template incorrectly named by FleetCommand" (by AussieLegend) and "Reverted tendentious violation of [...]" (by FleetCommand) are [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]] and a violation of [[WP:CIVIL]]. Also, imitating a bot's mistake is not a good excuse. |
:I've been watching you both for a while now and this has gone long enough. Per [[WP:NOTBROKEN]], both {{tl|Official}} and {{tl|Official website}} are okay but "fixed template incorrectly named by FleetCommand" (by AussieLegend) and "Reverted tendentious violation of [...]" (by FleetCommand) are [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]] and a violation of [[WP:CIVIL]]. Also, imitating a bot's mistake is not a good excuse. |
||
⚫ | :*{{Ping|AussieLegend}} Now, you, dear AussieLegend, must especially be careful: It was very mature and commendable of Fleet Command to say [[Special:Diff/625916375/next|"I humbly apologize"]] in response to {{u|Cyphoidbomb}} [[Special:Diff/624964355/prev|saying "fuck" and "crap" as well as posting a raspberry]]. Looking slightly deeper, it seems Fleet Command, who had the right to press the revert button, instead resorted to a discuss-first approach and started with an ice breaker. So, instead of slapping a block log into his face, you could have [[WP:Negotiation|negotiated]] over your unresolved dispute. All in all, your conduct has a lot of room for improvements. |
||
⚫ | :*@Fleet Command: As for you Fleet Command, I see you having posted another controversial edit summary: <blockquote>'Repaired damage inflicted by User:AussieLegend. Also, I don't care if "Zack" alone is used elsewhere as the common form, as long as the first sentence of this section introduces the full name.'</blockquote> Now, "damage inflicted" is okay (and eligible for being taken strictly in technical capacity) as long as you don't follow it up with "Reverted tendentious [...]". But instead of "I don't care", always say "I don't mind". |
||
⚫ | :{{Ping|AussieLegend}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | :@Fleet Command: As for you Fleet Command, I see you having posted another controversial edit summary: <blockquote>'Repaired damage inflicted by User:AussieLegend. Also, I don't care if "Zack" alone is used elsewhere as the common form, as long as the first sentence of this section introduces the full name.'</blockquote> Now, "damage inflicted" is okay as long as you don't follow it up with "Reverted tendentious [...]". But instead of "I don't care", always say "I don't mind". |
||
⚫ | |||
:Best regards, |
:Best regards, |
Revision as of 09:59, 10 October 2014
Deletion review for Windows 9
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Windows 9. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. NYKevin 23:52, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
October 2014 - Your abusive edit summaries at List of The Big Bang Theory characters
Tendentious, really?[1] Tendentious is reverting a valid correction that would be made by any of the automated tools - Reflinks, AWB etc. As for your bogus claim about coming to my talk page "in peace", you attacked me on the page and were called out for it by another editor.[2][3] You need to stop being so confrontational. It's caused you no end of trouble in the past,[4] and likely will continue to do so in the future. --AussieLegend (✉) 07:26, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hello, guys. I am here to have a word with both you.
- I've been watching you both for a while now and this has gone long enough. Per WP:NOTBROKEN, both {{Official}} and {{Official website}} are okay but "fixed template incorrectly named by FleetCommand" (by AussieLegend) and "Reverted tendentious violation of [...]" (by FleetCommand) are personal attacks and a violation of WP:CIVIL. Also, imitating a bot's mistake is not a good excuse.
- @AussieLegend: Now, you, dear AussieLegend, must especially be careful: It was very mature and commendable of Fleet Command to say "I humbly apologize" in response to Cyphoidbomb saying "fuck" and "crap" as well as posting a raspberry. Looking slightly deeper, it seems Fleet Command, who had the right to press the revert button, instead resorted to a discuss-first approach and started with an ice breaker. So, instead of slapping a block log into his face, you could have negotiated over your unresolved dispute. All in all, your conduct has a lot of room for improvements.
- @Fleet Command: As for you Fleet Command, I see you having posted another controversial edit summary:
Now, "damage inflicted" is okay (and eligible for being taken strictly in technical capacity) as long as you don't follow it up with "Reverted tendentious [...]". But instead of "I don't care", always say "I don't mind".'Repaired damage inflicted by User:AussieLegend. Also, I don't care if "Zack" alone is used elsewhere as the common form, as long as the first sentence of this section introduces the full name.'
- Please both of you note that it was not a social call or ordinary TPS: You two are not the only people in Wikipedia and what you two do hurts others as well; this is specifically correct as both of your occasionally appear in the computing topics.
- Best regards,
- Codename Lisa (talk) 09:44, 10 October 2014 (UTC)