Barnstars Humor
|
Fact, theory and a new journal
This article is likely to interest you, found via the links shown at Talk:evolution.... dave souza, talk 00:25, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Pro-Life (that's his name)
This guy, Pro-Life, seems notable enough. However, I did not get a chance to verify and wikify. Could you take a look at it? Thanks. TableMannersC·U·T 07:58, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- According to current interpretation of WP:NOTE TM is probably right. Which leads me to the conclusion that the bar is being set too low if a single (and rather silly) stunt can turn an otherwise insignificant politician into a "notable" one. I think a more skeptical look as to what constitutes "significant coverage" is warranted. HrafnTalkStalk 09:31, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
I have never heard of him, but that means little. He certainly is only marginally notable at best. I am a retentionist but I would feel better if there was more material in his bio here. I notice he himself or someone who probably is him has edited his own biography, so I wonder how reliable it really is. TM, why do you not do some real work and do the research and see what else you can find out about this guy?--Filll (talk) 14:29, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Pre-Adamites
Oh, what now? I believe humans existed before the so-called time of Adam, but presumably I'm not a pre-Adamite, since I don't believe in Adam. The distinction should be made clear. Evercat (talk) 20:19, 13 January 2008 (UTC)