Bakasuprman (talk | contribs) |
Bakasuprman (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
' |
' |
||
::And losing a war to China, in which no territory was actually lost is NPOV? I can eaasily see through your quoting of policy acronyms. Pretty soon [[Lashkar-e-Toiba]] will be a voice of human rights in Kashmir if you keep editing the page.<b>[[User:Bakasuprman|<font color="purple">Baka</font>]][[User talk:Bakasuprman|<font color="red">man</font>]]</b> 01:18, 22 April 2007 (UTC) |
::And losing a war to China, in which no territory was actually lost is NPOV? I can eaasily see through your quoting of policy acronyms. Pretty soon [[Lashkar-e-Toiba]] will be a voice of human rights in Kashmir if you keep editing the page.<b>[[User:Bakasuprman|<font color="purple">Baka</font>]][[User talk:Bakasuprman|<font color="red">man</font>]]</b> 01:18, 22 April 2007 (UTC) |
||
:::Take action for what? Catching you replacing an accepted fact with ISIcruft?<b>[[User:Bakasuprman|<font color="purple">Baka</font>]][[User talk:Bakasuprman|<font color="red">man</font>]]</b> 01:32, 22 April 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:32, 22 April 2007
Welcome message
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! --Hemanshu 20:28, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
hbo/catoon network
according to the hbo asia website there is no dedicated beam for pakistan, according to the website pakistan is covered by the hbo south asia beam of which ary digital is the authorized distributor for hbo in the territory of pakistan.
cartoon network had launched a pakistan specific beam which didnt yield out results as they had expected which led the channel to relay the cartoon network hq beam. http://europe.turnerinfo.com/CN/PAN/schedules/index.jsp <--- check out the schedule and match what you see on tv and then give me a buzz. dopekhor
Image tags
Thanks for contributing to wikipedia. I saw that you have uploaded some pictures. I have added tags to them. Please see Fair_use_rationale and add information to your images. You can check similar images with fairuse tags to see how people are using it. Thanks --Stonewash 10:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Pakistan Military UN Missions
Good job on the Military of Pakistan - United Nations Peacekeeping missions.
Although a list is good, if you can get some text and make it an article instead of a list article. It would be better. Like explaining the history of Pakistan in UN, the number of personnel in UN, why Pakistan send its troops there, what kind of specialties that Pakistani troops offered which no other country did, how did the people in those countries receive Pakistani troops, etc.
Get the proper information and I will help you fix it up. Also, go to other peace keeping missions by other countries and see if this is the standard article name for such operations. Mercenary2k 00:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Do this. Message, this person
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kirill_Lokshin
He is the head wikipedian in regards to military matters. Ask him about comments and suggestions for the Pakistani UN Page you created and the appropriate title for it. Mercenary2k 00:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Re: New article
Well, I'm generally not in favor of using unnecessary punctuation in article titles (it makes them rather messy to link to), so I'd suggest trying to get rid of the dash, at least. I would suggest either one of:
- UN peacekeeping missions involving the military of Pakistan
- UN peacekeeping missions involving Pakistan
or, alternately, if we can trim the UN part, the simpler:
- Peacekeeping operations involving the military of Pakistan
- Peacekeeping operations involving Pakistan
Hope that helps! Kirill Lokshin 01:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Great Job
Great Job on the Pakistani UN Article.
What you could do in the Military of Pakistan page is create a separate section which gives a brief summary of Pakistani UN Missions and give the link to this article. Also, move the Table at the bottom and move the text to the start of this article.
You should also give a brief summary in the start of the article about the histroy of Pakistani UN missions and its current status.
But other than that, a great job. Mercenary2k 05:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
title for article
I suggest you go with this.
UN peacekeeping missions involving Pakistan
Mercenary2k 22:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:103 JPG.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:103 JPG.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Great Power
That article it self is totally baseless and irrelevant.
It is not including major global powers such as the Roman Empire, Spanish and Portuguese Empires, the Dutch, Chinese, Byzantine, Persian, etc.
I made changes to the Indian section.
Mercenary2k 02:35, 16 April 2007 (UTC) '
- And losing a war to China, in which no territory was actually lost is NPOV? I can eaasily see through your quoting of policy acronyms. Pretty soon Lashkar-e-Toiba will be a voice of human rights in Kashmir if you keep editing the page.Bakaman 01:18, 22 April 2007 (UTC)