→Watch out: new section |
|||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
:Can you state your opinions on [[User_talk:MBisanz#Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion.2FArtistic_Tributes_to_Rachel_Corrie]] page. [[User:Kasaalan|Kasaalan]] ([[User talk:Kasaalan|talk]]) 19:08, 1 May 2009 (UTC) |
:Can you state your opinions on [[User_talk:MBisanz#Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion.2FArtistic_Tributes_to_Rachel_Corrie]] page. [[User:Kasaalan|Kasaalan]] ([[User talk:Kasaalan|talk]]) 19:08, 1 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
::[[Public reactions to death of Rachel Corrie]] getting a deletion review on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public reactions to death of Rachel Corrie]] [[User:Kasaalan|Kasaalan]] ([[User talk:Kasaalan|talk]]) 01:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Watch out == |
== Watch out == |
Revision as of 01:18, 4 May 2009
Hebraic people
Dear, Falastin fee qalby,I am an arabian too, And I appreciate what have done to my category "hebraic people" , But there is on problem, The Hebraic people Are descended from Aber ibn Shaleh ibn Arpheckshad ibn Sam ibn Noah ibn Lamek ibn Motoshaleh ibn Edres (Enoch) ibn Yared ibn Mehlaiel ibn Qenan ibn Anosh ibn Sheeth ibn Adam, who are Qahtanites, Adnanites, And Banu Israel, And you removed most of them from the category, And to let you see that I am right You should Read these articles, And there soures, And there refrinses :
- read "Qahtani origins" in the Qahtanite article.
- read Joktan
- read eber
- read Peleg
- read Ishmael
- read Mudar
- read Banu Hothail
- read Rabi`ah
Talkback
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Maen. K. A. (talk) 22:39, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Re:Ka'ak and Zeitoun
Hey Falastine, sorry I had to change it, but you see why it can't be an A-class article. It doesn't have to pass to pass the GA review for it to be A-class, but it's preferable. Now, I judge whether an article meets C-class on the basis of the article size being over 10,000 bytes, but since Ka'ak is not a subject that we could write extensively about (that's my assumption...), I think a C-class rating would suffice. Nonetheless, if you have any info on the pastry, please expand the article. As for Yamanam, I would have unblocked him sooner had I known about it. His IP address is still blocked, but as long as he logs in, there should be no problems. Regards, --Al Ameer son (talk) 03:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Certainly. Who knows, maybe we could for a GA? You should collaborate with Tiamut to make the article even better. I think it'll be good to expand on the various forms of ka'ak throughout the Arab world and yes, a section or passage on etymology would be great. By the way, how are things coming along with the Zeitoun attacks draft? --Al Ameer son (talk) 06:56, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Unless they're for recipes, recipe books are not too reliable... but it really depends on which book you are using. Forgive me for not continuing the review of the article. I made some edits in the rest of the article and will take another look at the whole article tomorrow hopefully. As for the messages issue, I have not had that problem. It's probably just a glitch. Tell me if it continues. Cheers! --Al Ameer son (talk) 04:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry for not responding. I must have missed it or forgot-it happens a lot with me :(. I'm pretty sure Wikipedia has tech support, but not sure where to go exactly. As for Zeitoun, go ahead an make the move, but please choose a different name like "Zeitoun incident" or "Zeitoun 2009 incident", for NPOV. Again, I'll look over the article, but it won't make a difference if you start the real one or not. Cheers and good luck! --Al Ameer son (talk) 05:47, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- No problem, it was my pleasure and I hope to help with the article now too. One thing though, about my "incident" suggestion, it might not be totally accurate since unlike the al-Fakhura or Beit Hanoun November 2006 incident, the situation with Zeitoun seems closer to combat (to me it resembles a massacre, but let's not go there until we have scholarly sources on it in the future.) Perhaps "Zeitoun raid" or something like that. Should we move this discussion to the article talk page? --Al Ameer son (talk) 06:14, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry for not responding. I must have missed it or forgot-it happens a lot with me :(. I'm pretty sure Wikipedia has tech support, but not sure where to go exactly. As for Zeitoun, go ahead an make the move, but please choose a different name like "Zeitoun incident" or "Zeitoun 2009 incident", for NPOV. Again, I'll look over the article, but it won't make a difference if you start the real one or not. Cheers and good luck! --Al Ameer son (talk) 05:47, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- Unless they're for recipes, recipe books are not too reliable... but it really depends on which book you are using. Forgive me for not continuing the review of the article. I made some edits in the rest of the article and will take another look at the whole article tomorrow hopefully. As for the messages issue, I have not had that problem. It's probably just a glitch. Tell me if it continues. Cheers! --Al Ameer son (talk) 04:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Lebanese Arabic
Hello, I've added your request for this article in the Wikipedia Project and in the article page.--Auslli (talk) 11:36, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hello again, I made some changes to the article for improving its wikipedicity. I've retired all the tags. Regards,--Auslli (talk) 13:42, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for dealing with the vandlism
thankyou for reverting the edits made by 67.165.71.214. Purplebananasandelephants (talk) 12:20, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- You're very welcome! --Falastine fee Qalby (talk) 16:15, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you Falastine fee Qalby, I do really appreciate your assistance in my blocking matter. I would really like to thank you for the time you took to assist me and to post my unblock request at slakr's userpage. Thank you again. --Yamanam (talk) 06:31, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: Experience festival.com is NOT a reliable source @ Shia Islam
Thanx for pointing out this source, an unreliable source tag has been placed against this source(you can help by putting at other occurrences, I found only 3). Meanwhile alternative sources are being searched to support or correct this info otherwise it'll be removed. Thanx again. --Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider Rizvi (talk) 04:27, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Regarding sources I have used most reliable source for the table of demographics on Shia Islam it is The Shia revival, Military Review , May-June, 2007 by Vali Nasr you can also have look on other sources quoted on text above the table. Most of the edits are either sourceless or based on unreliable source, so I have to revert them (few other users like Oggress, Rav, Pashtun, Doc and Seyyed also keep watch). Infact since the day I did this section I have been doing this job. I know I'm not being very helpful but at present thats all I can. --Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider Rizvi (talk) 06:00, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- I had been facing same difficulty since I took task to track Shia demographics. Good luck! plz let me know about links if you find them. Thanx--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider Rizvi (talk) 10:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Artistic Tributes to Rachel Corrie Page Getting Deleted
- Can you state your opinions on User_talk:MBisanz#Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion.2FArtistic_Tributes_to_Rachel_Corrie page. Kasaalan (talk) 19:08, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Public reactions to death of Rachel Corrie getting a deletion review on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public reactions to death of Rachel Corrie Kasaalan (talk) 01:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Watch out
...because next time you use this harassing language with me, you will get reported. I suggest you calm down. And only then will I be happy to discuss matters with you on your discussion page. Thank you. --Lanternix (talk) 01:46, 3 May 2009 (UTC)