→Notification: bit excessive Tag: Manual revert |
→1 year topic ban from transgender-related topics: new section Tags: Reverted New topic |
||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
Hey, I saw [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tim_Ballard&oldid=1176862609 your edit] to the [[Tim Ballard]] article and wanted to provide you with a brief correction on your understanding of [[Wikipedia:FOXNEWS|WP:FOX]] - refer to Note r. which states that "Local Fox affiliates are considered distinct from Fox News, and are covered by WP:NEWSORG." THese local affiliate stations are generally unbiased in their reporting and are distinct from the national network. [[User:LegalSmeagolian|LegalSmeagolian]] ([[User talk:LegalSmeagolian|talk]]) 16:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC) |
Hey, I saw [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tim_Ballard&oldid=1176862609 your edit] to the [[Tim Ballard]] article and wanted to provide you with a brief correction on your understanding of [[Wikipedia:FOXNEWS|WP:FOX]] - refer to Note r. which states that "Local Fox affiliates are considered distinct from Fox News, and are covered by WP:NEWSORG." THese local affiliate stations are generally unbiased in their reporting and are distinct from the national network. [[User:LegalSmeagolian|LegalSmeagolian]] ([[User talk:LegalSmeagolian|talk]]) 16:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC) |
||
== 1 year topic ban from transgender-related topics == |
|||
Per the [[Special:Permalink/1178387997#Proposal: 1-year transgender topic ban|consensus at ANI]] you are now subject to a [[WP:Topic ban|topic ban]] from [[transgender]]-related topics for 1 year (i.e. until the end of 2 October 2024). [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] ([[User talk:Thryduulf|talk]]) 10:14, 3 October 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:14, 3 October 2023
Hey FMSky, just wanted to let you know that the user was correct in removing the genres and was not a vandal. Ultimate Guitar is inadmissible as a source unless the genre was described in the context of a staff review, as opposed to a sidebar (this was the case) or user review. I know you meant well, and I watch all of Deftones' album pages, so I wanted to kindly clear that up. dannymusiceditor oops 03:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
DABRL
Hi, you made this revert citing MOS:DABRL. However, MOS:DABRL specifically states: "Red links should not be the only link in a given entry; link also to an existing article, so that a reader (as opposed to a contributing editor) will have somewhere to navigate to for additional information.
The example given in DABRL also goes on to state: "If "flibbygibby" is not mentioned in the noodle article, or there is no linked article at all, as in the toy example, it is not a valid entry".
In this case, the red link (Settle the Score (band)) is the only link in the entry, and there is no link to an existing article (blue link), contrary to MOS:DABRL. Bennv123 (talk) 11:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Edit about Cherry Pie Picache
Cherry Pie Picache's role in Batang Quiapo is a main character. 2001:4451:1230:3600:DD08:8211:9988:A804 (talk) 12:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I see you reverted my edits at We Are Chaos again due to this source's presence under the reliable sources listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources. I wanted to let you know that I have just started a discussion here questioning whether or not Sputnikmusic is a reliable source, if you would like to make any arguments for or against its use going forward. JeffSpaceman (talk) 20:47, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- It literally says it is reliable https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Sources --FMSky (talk) 21:52, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- I know that, and I am questioning its validity at the link I have provided. It is a self-published source that hosts a lot of user-generated content, so I don't see why it holds this status, which is exactly why I have opened up discussion here. If you have anything to argue for its continued inclusion, feel free to comment there. JeffSpaceman (talk) 21:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Masterson RFC
Hi, I saw that you reverted my edit in the Danny Masterson Request For Comments, but you didn't say why you reverted it: can you please explain? Thanks, Chillowack (talk) 17:12, 14 September 2023 (UTC) This one? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1175316857&oldid=1175292933&title=Talk:Danny_Masterson
- Cause that looked like vandalism tbh, why did you remove all this stuff lol --FMSky (talk) 17:50, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry: you're saying my comment that I would omit the word "rapist" from the lede looked like "vandalism"? Remove what stuff? I didn't "remove" anything, I just added my vote. Why did you delete it?Chillowack (talk) 18:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- you mass deleted a bunch of stuff. click https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1175316857&oldid=1175292933&title=Talk:Danny_Masterson --FMSky (talk) 18:37, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- Like I said: I didn't delete anything. All I did was add my vote. You are mistaken.Chillowack (talk) 18:40, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- its shown in the edit history. accept it and move on --FMSky (talk) 19:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- I don't "accept" it because I didn't do it. But I will move on to keep the peace.Chillowack (talk) 00:08, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- its shown in the edit history. accept it and move on --FMSky (talk) 19:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- Like I said: I didn't delete anything. All I did was add my vote. You are mistaken.Chillowack (talk) 18:40, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- you mass deleted a bunch of stuff. click https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1175316857&oldid=1175292933&title=Talk:Danny_Masterson --FMSky (talk) 18:37, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry: you're saying my comment that I would omit the word "rapist" from the lede looked like "vandalism"? Remove what stuff? I didn't "remove" anything, I just added my vote. Why did you delete it?Chillowack (talk) 18:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Candace Owens
Hello FMSky. I moved the info on Candace Owens blog back up to the "Degree180 and anti-conservative blog" section (she did not write the article about Trump's penis which seems to be implied in the language used) and added some language to the "Donald Trump" section noting her shift in attitude. I also restored the copy of the actual article which is useful. Per the archives, there is not record she wrote any articles about Trump.Patapsco913 (talk) 11:42, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Paid placement blog/magazine
Saw your re-addition of the "vents" blog/"magazine"/whatever again. Prior discussions are here: 2016, February of this year and this month. Each evaluation was clearly that it is not reliable. This site is almost exclusively paid placement and spam, there are hundreds of ads on the usual sites for blackhat placement, and there is absolutely no indication of competent editorial control or disclosure of advertorials. Utter spam like this is common; I've removed the source hundreds of times. If you're seeing something that was missed by everyone else, let me know and we can start another conversation at WP:RSN with the alternate view. Sam Kuru (talk) 01:21, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
RFC sig
Hi FMSky. I think you need to add a signature to the RFC proposal at Talk:What Is a Woman?. The bot that copies it over to the central listings tries to grab everything before the first sig, and right now it's including your !vote. I'd recommend putting one right after "(or similar wording)". Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:50, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Question
Have you setup a user email? Example, if you look at my home page then you will see a link on the screen to "email this user". Springee (talk) 19:09, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- no, why? --FMSky (talk) 19:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Sometimes offline discussions helpful when discussing wikipedia without putting comments out in public. Note that a user can email you via the system and your email address is not shared. It's only shared if you reply. Springee (talk) 19:47, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
MrBeast AI upscale
Replacement here wasn't a question of whether I'm a fan of AI upscaling, there was a small but strongly expressed consensus to add AI upscaling software should generally not be used to increase the resolution or quality of an old or low-resolution image. Original historical images should always be used in place of AI upscaled versions. If an AI-upscaled image is used in an article, this fact should be noted in its caption.
to MOS:IMAGES last month.
That might benefit from another iteration or exception or a wider discussion, but that's what the MOS is saying right now. Belbury (talk) 17:19, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Mark Walhberg
Hello FMSky, my last revision was NOT misleading.. If you simply looked and read in the infobox Mark is indeed businessman and former rapper. Nothing was vandilism/misleading nothing. Kindly read before making such edits Juli Wolfe (talk) 18:49, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Jimmy Fallon
Hello FMSky, you appear to have removed my edit on Jimmy Fallon's page. How do the accusations of him abusing his staffers relate to criticism and editorial bias; I see no connection between criticism and a head that should the allegations from the main Tonight Show paragraph in his page.Radiohist (talk) 09:58, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thats not removed, just in another section, see WP:CSECTION --FMSky (talk) 10:32, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Request for Ronaldo
Hi, thanks for updating the article but there is one problem, in the box, in caption section please mention the cup or league and the team is playing against. You can use this description for the image: Ronaldo playing for Al Nassr against Persepolis in September 2023 91.98.35.147 (talk) 03:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Your revert
Hello, I hope you are well. In what way was my close "too early"? Seven days have passed since the original listing. Thanks, Edward-Woodrow • talk 14:26, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Cause only two ppl have responded so far --FMSky (talk) 14:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Given that that
no minimum participation is required for requested moves
, and I saw rough consensus not to move, I boldly closed the discussion. Edward-Woodrow • talk 14:35, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Given that that
- Cause only two ppl have responded so far --FMSky (talk) 14:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Abdullah the Butcher
Have a look at these changes. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
The Departed
Hi, how do you mean it sounded better before? It said approval rating of 91% before. Nowhere on the rotten tomatoes site is it given approval rating. It is called tomatometer, which is the percentage of critics who have given a positive review for the film. Also, the number of critics has risen now, check the site. Plus I have added the percentage of critics who have given the film a positive review on metacritic site, which was missing before. Cinephile4ever 14:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Your Understanding of WP:FOX
Hey, I saw your edit to the Tim Ballard article and wanted to provide you with a brief correction on your understanding of WP:FOX - refer to Note r. which states that "Local Fox affiliates are considered distinct from Fox News, and are covered by WP:NEWSORG." THese local affiliate stations are generally unbiased in their reporting and are distinct from the national network. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 16:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Per the consensus at ANI you are now subject to a topic ban from transgender-related topics for 1 year (i.e. until the end of 2 October 2024). Thryduulf (talk) 10:14, 3 October 2023 (UTC)