MezzoMezzo (talk | contribs) →Slow down: new section |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation]]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> |
[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation]]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> |
||
== Slow down == |
|||
Hey man, you're new. I'm sorry if anything I say can be a shock coming in here, but you need to slow down. I noticed that your discussion with me became testy and almost passive aggressive on your part very quickly. Perhaps my responses weren't what you expected, but that's part of collaborative editing.<br> |
|||
I dug further into your edits and I noticed that you've been reverted by [[User:David Biddulph]], [[User:Toddy1]] and [[User:Неполканов]], all of whom are established Wikipedia editors. And I'm telling you right now, as I told you at [[Template talk:Sunni Islam]] that if you try to edit the template based on your current line of reasoning, you will have me reverting you as well.<br> |
|||
Perhaps it seems unfair, and that we're all wrong. That is theoretically possible. But look at it this way...you have not even been at this site for one month. You've engaged in your first edit war and you've fallen into conflict with multiple editors. That can't be a good sign and it might be a good idea to take a step back and ask yourself, "what can I do to not fall into such conflicts." Sometimes part of getting the job done (editing) is adjusting your own behavior even when you feel others are wrong. It's sometimes the best choice at work, and it's sometimes the best choice here at Wikipedia. [[User:MezzoMezzo|MezzoMezzo]] ([[User talk:MezzoMezzo|talk]]) 06:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:39, 9 February 2014
Please email me to ensure I will respond quickly.
F.Tromble, you are invited to the Teahouse
Hi F.Tromble! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Slow down
Hey man, you're new. I'm sorry if anything I say can be a shock coming in here, but you need to slow down. I noticed that your discussion with me became testy and almost passive aggressive on your part very quickly. Perhaps my responses weren't what you expected, but that's part of collaborative editing.
I dug further into your edits and I noticed that you've been reverted by User:David Biddulph, User:Toddy1 and User:Неполканов, all of whom are established Wikipedia editors. And I'm telling you right now, as I told you at Template talk:Sunni Islam that if you try to edit the template based on your current line of reasoning, you will have me reverting you as well.
Perhaps it seems unfair, and that we're all wrong. That is theoretically possible. But look at it this way...you have not even been at this site for one month. You've engaged in your first edit war and you've fallen into conflict with multiple editors. That can't be a good sign and it might be a good idea to take a step back and ask yourself, "what can I do to not fall into such conflicts." Sometimes part of getting the job done (editing) is adjusting your own behavior even when you feel others are wrong. It's sometimes the best choice at work, and it's sometimes the best choice here at Wikipedia. MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)