reply |
New message (RW 16.1) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article [[Help:Talk pages|talk pages]] to try to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Through discussion|consensus]]. If you are unable to agree at [[Talk:2022 Karnataka hijab row]], please use one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests|dispute resolution options]] to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:Venkat TL|Venkat TL]] ([[User talk:Venkat TL|talk]]) 09:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC) |
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article [[Help:Talk pages|talk pages]] to try to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Through discussion|consensus]]. If you are unable to agree at [[Talk:2022 Karnataka hijab row]], please use one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests|dispute resolution options]] to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:Venkat TL|Venkat TL]] ([[User talk:Venkat TL|talk]]) 09:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
:{{Reply|Venkat TL}} Yes, I completely understand what is edit warring. I can see that in the past 24 hours I have only made 1 revert on the mentioned page that was of your edit because I felt that the removal of content was not right, if you were to revert that revert of mine to restore your version, I would've reached you out to settle this. [[User:Extorc|Extorc]] ([[User talk:Extorc#top|talk]]) 09:37, 22 February 2022 (UTC) |
:{{Reply|Venkat TL}} Yes, I completely understand what is edit warring. I can see that in the past 24 hours I have only made 1 revert on the mentioned page that was of your edit because I felt that the removal of content was not right, if you were to revert that revert of mine to restore your version, I would've reached you out to settle this. [[User:Extorc|Extorc]] ([[User talk:Extorc#top|talk]]) 09:37, 22 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
== Message == |
|||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' |
|||
You have shown interest in articles about [[WP:Biographies of living persons|living or recently deceased people]], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. |
|||
For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
|||
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Venkat TL|Venkat TL]] ([[User talk:Venkat TL|talk]]) 13:35, 24 February 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:35, 24 February 2022
August 2021
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, India women's national field hockey team, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|talk 04:35, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Archiving
Hi, Extorc. I moved page [Talk:Kolkata TV Not reliable Diptyajit/Archive 1] to User talk:Extorc/Archive 1. [Talk:Kolkata TV Not reliable Diptyajit] and [Talk:Attacks on me] are not User namespaces. Rrefer to WP:Namespace. Sawol (talk) 10:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Sawol: Thanks for that. I made that name after following the Archiving guide and I might've misinterpreted the naming convention. Extorc (talk) 10:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
February 2022
Hi Extorc! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of 2022 Karnataka hijab row several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:2022 Karnataka hijab row, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Venkat TL (talk) 09:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Venkat TL: Yes, I completely understand what is edit warring. I can see that in the past 24 hours I have only made 1 revert on the mentioned page that was of your edit because I felt that the removal of content was not right, if you were to revert that revert of mine to restore your version, I would've reached you out to settle this. Extorc (talk) 09:37, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Message
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.