Notice of request for injunction |
SlimVirgin (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
==Notice of request for injunction== |
==Notice of request for injunction== |
||
I expect you'll see this in my reply on my own page, but just to make sure: I've requested an injunction against you posting there anymore.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&diff=34258954&oldid=34257099] You may not be ''trying'' to harrass me, but that's the effect you're having. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 18:00, 7 January 2006 (UTC). |
I expect you'll see this in my reply on my own page, but just to make sure: I've requested an injunction against you posting there anymore.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&diff=34258954&oldid=34257099] You may not be ''trying'' to harrass me, but that's the effect you're having. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 18:00, 7 January 2006 (UTC). |
||
==Violation of arbcom ruling== |
|||
James, your repeated questioning of Bishonen regarding a block by Snowspinner is violating the arbcom ruling against you. When you asked for clarification of this, Raul654 replied that: "Everyking is not to mention, gesture, indicate, or gesticulate in any way that implies Snowspinner or any action taken by Snowspinner (including, but not limited, to Snowspinner's edits)." [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&curid=438960&diff=34216069&oldid=34214208] Please note that if you continue with your current course of action, you're likely to be blocked from editing. [[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]] <sup><font color="Purple">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</font></sup> 19:02, 7 January 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:02, 7 January 2006
Questions, comments, thoughts, complaints? (last blanked 1/1/06)
Hilary Duff
Sorry for vandalizing your talk page. I just wanted to get your attention. Jim16 03:58, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
you're a tribute to wikipedia everyking. -anonomous
thank you
![]() |
Greetings Everyking, I wish to offer my gratitude for supporting me on my recent nomination for adminship, which passed with the final tally of 65/4/3. If you would ever desire my assistance in anything, or wish to give me feedback on any actions I take, feel free to let me know. Cheers! Elle vécut heureusement toujours dorénavant (Be eudaimonic!) 09:48, 1 January 2006 (UTC) |
The community is against me
I had always known the entire was against me, despite my faithful contributions. Please see the following, and if you can discuss the situation at this article. Thanks! Happy new year! —Hollow Wilerding . . . (talk) 15:03, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
George Reeves
I realize this is old news, since you wrote it 1 1/2 years ago, but the find-a-grave site that you cited on the George Reeves page states that his mother made a mistake on the grave marker, that his birthday was January 5, 1914, not January 6 as the marker states. That seems hard to believe, but the find-a-grave authors must think they know something. Wahkeenah 16:02, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
Message to Jimmy
Dear EveryKing: Hi, I was looking to see if Jimmy had answered my question when I ran into this message you sent him:
-Proposal to ban intellectuals-
Please send me the page to vote against it...me not been able to write about boxing, fashion or show business again?? Nahh it won;t happen if up to me.
Thanks and God bless you!
Endorse my summary, PLEASE!
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Bishonen
We were unfairly blocked, that is why I have started this RfC. Thanks, EK. Siblings WC 02:28, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
DrippingInk, Hollow Wilerding, Winnermario
Hello. I have just registered an account on Wikipedia. I was searching for an administrator to help me become familiar with Wikipedia, and stumbled upon Bishonen. In regard to the blocks of DrippingInk, Hollow Wilerding, and Winnermario, I must make it clear that the operators of these accounts was... questionable. You see, I was introduced merely yesterday (January 2, 2006) to Wikipedia. The woman known as Hollow Wilerding presented me with her computer as a late Christmas gift as she is ordering a new computer. It might be in your personal interest to know that these three accounts have not been operated by three separate people; these accounts have been operated by two people. William Wilerding owned the DrippingInk account, while Mariah Wilerding owned the Winnermario account, and the reincarnation of Hollow Wilerding. Blocking these users was certainly the best decision that any administrator could make — they are deceitful people with terrible attitudes. Also, they are very clueless when it comes to English, which is a shame considering Mariah is an English teacher. I, Cruz Nelson, served as an English student of Mariah's from 2004–2005. I must admit that it was like living in hell; I have no idea how she was capable of receiving her graduate diploma. All in all, I have come to announce that she literally gave me her computer in an attempt to return to Wikipedia under a new IP address. Although some of their contributions, namely Cool (song) were generous and positive, overall these two siblings are not going to go far in life. Please understand what I am saying. Thank you. –Cruz AFade (Speak about it | How many?) 17:29, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above was a really random comment from Cruz, my brother, or User:DrippingInk. As it stands, those fools don't look like they're going to be holding up — as long as I am present, I just know they're going to remedy my actions. That's not going to be happening. Since anyone is allowed to Wikipedia, that's what I'm going to be doing. In addition... actually I'll stop here. Please reply when you log on. ;) —Empty Wallow | Wollaw Ytpme 20:42, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
wheel warring
Take a look at AN/I today. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 00:07, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
If several good faith contributors don't listen to you, why should a vandal? :-) Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:10, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
In response to User talk:Empty Wallow
James, don't worry.
Administrators are all the same — except for you. They made fun of all my comments and removed my comments from User talk:Bishonen because they have the power to block people, and all that other fancy stuff they're capable of. They love the power. Administators are merely a mockery of everyone else on the site: RfA is a popularity contest, RfCs are difficult to handle when one is not an admin and filing it... I have it very difficult. The reason I changed from User:Winnermario to User:Hollow Wilerding was because I had originally approached the Wikipedia community in bad faith. Very bad faith. That's the reason I had switched, and though I never wanted to do any harm, well, I kind of had gotten carried away. User:DrippingInk is ashamed of the Wikipedia community and myself now. He believes that administrators have to be removed from Wikipedia altogether.
Well so do I. The blocking of the three accounts shows something: loathe; hate. The administators who participated in the conversations noted that I wasn't someone they wanted to have editing Wikipedia anymore. Well, let me tell you that I sure as hell did more work than some of those fools are ever going to do — Cool (song), Luxurious (song), Hollaback Girl, The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask, Shakira. Those are my best articles, and one notorious editor who I would banish if I were capable of it, User:SlimVirgin noted that I be removed and that my contributions were not anything to envy. Funny, considering she had never communicated me prior to the accusations.
Furthermore, I am taking a two-week wikiholiday beginning today. Since that was my banishment time, I am finally going to be accepting it. However, upon my return, something nice called Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Administrators will be materialising, Majora's Mask is returning to FAC without a vote from my brother, Luxurious is going to become featured, and I'm going to continue work on The Island (2005 film). They're actually lucky that they even have me editing on this site; if they hadn't, they wouldn't have had all these articles improve so amazingly.
It's funny to think, after accusing me, they didn't even believe my name, occupation, or even nation. Hideously laughable because if that is what the Wikipedia community is made of, this site will be gone very, very soon. See you in late January. Could you endorsement my RfC come the time? They banished you from the administrators board not because you are a terrible admin — because you assume good faith. And that's what Wikipedia should really be about.
Oh, by the way, my name is Mariah Wilerding. 64.231.75.102 14:50, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
- The last I heard, you were unfortunately banned indefinitely...so you may not be able to return in two weeks. You might be able to get it shortened if you appeal to the right people, though (not me, although I would love to do it, because there are people who have been looking for me to use admin powers in some questionable way for a long time, so they can have me desysopped). Everyking 22:11, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
- I know! Don't you see? Wikipedia is consisted of mere popularity! When one does not agree with the others, they are degraded for this. The majority of the administators went against us because they were all just agreeing with each other. I understand why they are attempting to have you desysopped — now you do too. You don't agree with them, and also because as I've noted above, you assume good faith, which nearly every admin doesn't. But will you endorse my RfC? I plan on having every admin desysopped, especially Bishonen, who, if you noticed, ignored all of my comments when it pretained to:
- She ignored all of those comments. You now see? The admins are like an organization materialised in bad faith. The fact that she ignored the comments proved it: she wanted to be right, and knew that if she were wrong would be desysopped. Please endorse my RfC come my return. 64.231.75.102 22:22, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Siiigh
Well, I tried my best, but I couldn't get the proposal through. However, I did get a clarification asked for you on WP:RFAR and I'm still willing to speak for you if the need ever arises. Sorry it didn't work out. Cheers.--Tznkai 05:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
When I said...
"I thought that you were considered too opinionated on everything." I was kidding. I'm sorry if that wasn't obvious.
brenneman(t)(c) 07:19, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
He won the Nobel Prize!
That was the content of the Robert Aumann article when it was deleted. WP:CSD A1: Little or no context. Nobel Prize for what? When? Actually, I was about to block the account who created it as an impersonation of Jimbo, then checked the Jimbo's contributions list, and thought better... Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Rfa thanks
Hello James. Thank you for supporting my Rfa! :) I will try my best to be a good administrator. Please ask me if you need any help. --a.n.o.n.y.m t 17:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC) |
Bulbasaur
I don't think there's anything else I can add. I expanded the May's Bulbasaur paragraph a bit. See what you think: Bulbasaur, Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bulbasaur. Thanks! --Celestianpower háblame 17:30, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Notice of request for injunction
I expect you'll see this in my reply on my own page, but just to make sure: I've requested an injunction against you posting there anymore.[1] You may not be trying to harrass me, but that's the effect you're having. Bishonen | talk 18:00, 7 January 2006 (UTC).
Violation of arbcom ruling
James, your repeated questioning of Bishonen regarding a block by Snowspinner is violating the arbcom ruling against you. When you asked for clarification of this, Raul654 replied that: "Everyking is not to mention, gesture, indicate, or gesticulate in any way that implies Snowspinner or any action taken by Snowspinner (including, but not limited, to Snowspinner's edits)." [2] Please note that if you continue with your current course of action, you're likely to be blocked from editing. SlimVirgin (talk) 19:02, 7 January 2006 (UTC)