George Spurlin (talk | contribs) →Arbitration Enforcment warning: new section |
m Signing comment by George Spurlin - "→Arbitration Enforcment warning: new section" |
||
Line 157:
== Arbitration Enforcment warning ==
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Esc2003 FYI] <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:George Spurlin|George Spurlin]] ([[User talk:George Spurlin|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/George Spurlin|contribs]]) 10:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
|
Revision as of 10:02, 4 September 2012
Your edits to Armenian genocide related articles
I apologize for blocking you too fast. The edits you were making to articles related to the Armenian genocide were very similar to edits made by notrious editwarriors and sockpuppeteers. When I saw your edithistory however you weren't so similar that I could justify a block per WP:DUCK. In the future please don't remove categories having to do with the Armenian genocide from articles without discussion.·Maunus·ƛ· 16:07, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Don't just remove sourced sections in controversial articles
Please don't just remove sourced sections in controversial articles without discussing it first on talk, as you did at Ethnic cleansing. Continued removal of sourced information like this may result in a block. Thanks. Fainites barleyscribs 13:33, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Text and references removal in article Sari Gelin
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sari Gelin (diff), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Movses (talk) 05:20, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Changes to the Eurovision Song Contest 2012 article
Thank you for your contributions to the Eurovision Song Contest 2012 article. However I have reverted your change in the status of Armenia to confirmed, since the source you were using dates from June 2011, and we have a more recent source from August expressing doubt on if Armenia will participate due to security issues. In most circumstances, the newest source takes precedence. CT Cooper · talk 10:17, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Eurovision Invitation!
Could other users check User:MarshallBagramyan expropriation of the entire Kars article.
Could other users check User:MarshallBagramyan expropriation of the entire Kars article. This user constantly erases the other versions of the name of the city Kars in other languages (Armenian: Կարս Kars or Ղարս [ʁɑɾs] Ghars, Azerbaijani: Qars, Georgian: ყარსი Kars, Kurdish: Qers, Russian: Карс Kars) , and only lets the Armenian version of the name to stay (Armenian: Կարս Kars or Ղարս [ʁɑɾs] Ghars). Unfortunately this user's ethnocentric POV pushing by ignoring the history of the city, after the Armenian era, is still allowed to stay. He even defends it in the city article talk page. Could you follow the Kars article and prevent the constant nationalist POV reversals and editions of User:MarshallBagramyan. Thank you.
- User:MarshallBagramyan has started again erasing the city of Kars's name in other languages apart from its Armenian name. Could all users check and revert this user's ethnocentric POV pushing by ignoring the history of the city. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.28.56 (talk) 17:39, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
re Shushi Province
Please do not make unilateral, obviously contentious moves. Such a thing needed to be discussed before doing, and reverting it was proper. The argument over whether or not the city is named Shusha or Shushi is valid; but the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic has designated a particular province as "Shushi" and there can be no argument over that. No one is saying the Azerbaijani rayon is named Shushi, in fact I don't think anyone has suggested that. --Golbez (talk) 14:19, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
- I made a map of Cyprus like 4 years ago that I used the Greek names because I didn't know there were Turkish names. And if you aren't speaking specifically to my map then your statement is useless. There's no reason to think that this article should have been moved to "Shusha Province" on three Wikipedias (were there more? If so, please tell me or undo them), nationalism or not. It's simply *false*, and I can think of no reason to ever make it unless you're either a nationalist or a vandal. Is there a third option you'd like to share? --Golbez (talk) 14:39, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
- No, I don't understand what you mean by what the French wikipedia is doing. Also, we aren't talking about the city. We're talking about an NKR Province. You can't say their name is incorrect, they can name it whatever they want, as it's merely a political construct. --Golbez (talk) 15:01, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
- Right. Shusha is a city in Nagorno-Karabakh/Azerbaijan, named "Shushi" by locals. Shusha Rayon is an Azerbaijani political construct. Shushi Province is a Karabakhi political construct. I'm not seeing why you don't understand this. No one is saying the Azeri rayon is not named Shusha, what you are saying is that the Karabakhi government has named a province "Shusha" which is simply false. They are allowed to name their provinces whatever they want. The United States has a state named Alaska, the Japanese have a prefecture named Hokkaido, the Azeris have a rayon named Agdam, and the Karabakhis have a province named Shushi. What part of this are you missing? --Golbez (talk) 15:25, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
- I intervened to stop a incorrect move of the article on the province; where the article on the city is located is a subject that requires discussion, and unfortunately I don't know French. :) Whether the city is named Shusha or Shushi is open to discussion and interpretation; that the province is named Shushi (and the rayon is named Shusha) is simple fact. --Golbez (talk) 15:58, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
- Right. Shusha is a city in Nagorno-Karabakh/Azerbaijan, named "Shushi" by locals. Shusha Rayon is an Azerbaijani political construct. Shushi Province is a Karabakhi political construct. I'm not seeing why you don't understand this. No one is saying the Azeri rayon is not named Shusha, what you are saying is that the Karabakhi government has named a province "Shusha" which is simply false. They are allowed to name their provinces whatever they want. The United States has a state named Alaska, the Japanese have a prefecture named Hokkaido, the Azeris have a rayon named Agdam, and the Karabakhis have a province named Shushi. What part of this are you missing? --Golbez (talk) 15:25, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
- No, I don't understand what you mean by what the French wikipedia is doing. Also, we aren't talking about the city. We're talking about an NKR Province. You can't say their name is incorrect, they can name it whatever they want, as it's merely a political construct. --Golbez (talk) 15:01, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Making unilateral edits
I can forgive you if you did not read my latest comment on the Kars talk page here. But I don't think after all the reverts that have been taking place on that article that you would be ignorant of the importance to discuss the inclusion of names in the lead section. I have stated it several times already, but a consensus reached a long time ago agreed that only the Armenian name could be kept. The inclusion of Azerbaijani is not well-sustained (on the sole basis of present residence) and Kars has never had a substantial Kurdish population and cannot be considered a Kurdish city today in the sense of Van or Diyarbekir. Now, I invited Verman1 to initiate a discussion and present his argument several times and he yet continued to edit war and did not bother to provide his reasons. You have never contributed anything to a talk page but you're welcome to start a new discussion; otherwise, ignoring the pleas of another editor in so blatant a manner is just discourteous and shows to others that you are not interested in working together to improve these articles. Regards, --Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 19:09, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- Can you please show me where exactly you got consensus that only Armenian name should be kept? I can not find consent of all parties involved. --Verman1 (talk) 18:40, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Erivan
The city of Yerevan has an important Turkish heritage. Therefor the Turkish name should be included in it. I don't understand why you change it, but before changing I suggest you post a notice in the articles talk page. (Central Data Bank (talk))
- Yes the Seljuks have many ruins there, however it was under Ottoman rule for many years. I am not defending Turkish irredentism by any means, but Turkey is the successor of the Ottoman Empire with is the closest to the Seljuks (some may count count Azerbaijan too). Therefor I stand by my claim. Also the Khanate you asked about is Persian not Turkish. Regards (Central Data Bank (talk) 18:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC))
Minor edits
Hi there. Can I ask that you please don't mark edits as minor unless they really are minor? In Kars for example[1], we are still working for consensus, and while minor edits can be used for obvious vandalism, they should not be used to revert someone with whom you're involved in an edit war. --Quintucket (talk) 15:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Could all Azeri users check User:Yerevanci's and User:Nocturnal781's relentless POV additions, lately in the Ermenikend article.
Could all Azeri users check User:Yerevanci's and User:Nocturnal781's relentless POV additions, lately in the Ermenikend article.
These users constantly change the correct article name of Ermenikend into the incorrect name of "Armenikend". Could all Azeri users prevent the taking over of articles about Azerbaijan by Armenian users with their biased nationalistic POV agenda. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.158.240 (talk) 12:24, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
People of Kazakh(stani) descent
You created a new category with a name and parent categories very similar to those of an existing category, moved the contents of the existing category into the new category, and tagged the old one as empty (but the wrong way). That's our very definition of attempting to move without discussion. Please do not empty categories without first getting consensus at WP:CFD. Nyttend (talk) 14:19, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
- Your claim is not a reason for speedy deletion or for violating our categorisation policies. Nyttend (talk) 14:41, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
The article Turk's head toilet bowl brush has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Appears to be an unremarkable product made by a company.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 19
Hi. When you recently edited Turk's head toilet bowl brush, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Turk's head toilet bowl brush for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Turk's head toilet bowl brush is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turk's head toilet bowl brush until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:22, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
April 2012
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turk's head toilet bowl brush. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The Bushranger One ping only 07:05, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. When you recently edited Çiğdem Talu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Category_names#Supranational_.2F_historical_country_categories
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Category_names#Supranational_.2F_historical_country_categories. KarlB (talk) 19:15, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Template:Z48
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Thank you for making more than 1,000 edits to improve the free encyclopedia. Keep up the good work. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 17:44, 7 May 2012 (UTC) |
- Not tired of hearing it at all! Glad it means something. :) Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 20:47, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
re
Eh, it seems sound to me. That it is indigenous to Armenia appears to not be in dispute, and the term appears to come from Armenian. The word for it in the other local languages is supplied right there in the lede, so why should Azeri and Turkish get higher billing than Russian and Georgian? In a situation like this I have no problem with just having the language the term originated in and the rest treated in text. Also, you should know better than to revert without supplying a reason. If my assumptions of the above (where the item and word originated from) are incorrect based on my roughly 12 seconds of looking at the article, then I apologize but that's how it appears to me, if there truly is a conflict in these statements of fact then perhaps an RFC is in order. Or, discussing on the talk page, which I note neither of you has done at all. --Golbez (talk) 17:10, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- And both Azeri and Turkish in the lede. So perhaps the solution for you is to also remove the Farsi name from the template to even things up. In fact, I'll do that. --Golbez (talk) 17:29, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
June 2012
Before removing a category from an article, as you did to Template:Eurovision Song Contest 2012, please make sure that the subject of the article no longer belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories should only be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Wesley☀Mouse 14:57, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
August 2012
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Alexis Nicolas. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 16:35, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Apart from him being born in England and sources saying he is English? GiantSnowman 19:17, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Baklava
- Opps! Sorry, my fault, I thought that you removed from the list. Actually someone put back there, but you are right: we removed it already a couple of time from the lead. Sorry again! Alex2006 (talk) 10:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Adding inappropriate categories
Stop adding inappropriate categories to Turkish speaking countries. As I've already explained, only countries where Turkish is a majority language qualify. And using hypocritical accusations is also not acceptable. Kostja (talk) 11:19, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- You can delete on Wikipedia but you can't change the facts in real life. I am not hypocritical. I created category of "Kurdish-speaking countries and territories" and Armenian-speaking countries and territories..etc You stay with your negative nationalism. Esc2003 (talk) 11:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- Please stop with the hysterics. Your categories do not fit the criteria I quoted, and this is what matters here. And no one in real life would call a country where Turks are small minority Turkish speaking. Kostja (talk) 11:38, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- Is Turkish official language in Bulgaria? Esc2003 (talk) 11:41, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- Please stop with the hysterics. Your categories do not fit the criteria I quoted, and this is what matters here. And no one in real life would call a country where Turks are small minority Turkish speaking. Kostja (talk) 11:38, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Turk's head brush article dispute is on alert in wikipedia admin noticeboard
Just to inform you:
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
Qatarihistorian (talk) 17:29, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Re:Khojaly
No, and the administrator does not disagree. It is just that the renaming is not classified as speedy and the page should be nominated here instead. Parishan (talk) 05:34, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Arbitration Enforcment warning
FYI — Preceding unsigned comment added by George Spurlin (talk • contribs) 10:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)