200.85.112.112 (talk) Belarussian political parties |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
See for the archive [[User talk:Electionworld/Archive]] |
See for the archive [[User talk:Electionworld/Archive]] |
||
==insults== |
|||
The way the depression and the totalitarian sections were phrased made the macroeconomic assumptions appear to be correct. Thus you give defacto support for their belief. Which you do in fact believe in. I called you a name because its taken this long just to get you to leave up PART of a segment where I defend liberal interpretations other than the one you support, to NOT GET COMPLETLY DELETED. Then you insult my position by calling it propaganda, thus showing your lack of intelligence. Again, I hate to call names, and I rarely do it. I only save it for the people who disserve it the most! -Gibby |
|||
Revision as of 16:28, 5 December 2005
See for the archive User talk:Electionworld/Archive
insults
The way the depression and the totalitarian sections were phrased made the macroeconomic assumptions appear to be correct. Thus you give defacto support for their belief. Which you do in fact believe in. I called you a name because its taken this long just to get you to leave up PART of a segment where I defend liberal interpretations other than the one you support, to NOT GET COMPLETLY DELETED. Then you insult my position by calling it propaganda, thus showing your lack of intelligence. Again, I hate to call names, and I rarely do it. I only save it for the people who disserve it the most! -Gibby
A one question about CPE
Is Estonian Centre Party a member of the Liberal International? The article about LI dosen't sho it. But artcle about CPE shows it.
Politics
First, thank you very much for your hard work in adding categories and articles to the Politics portal and for adding links to the Portal on by-country templates - your work is massively appreciated. If you have any further suggestions on how to raise the Po rtal's profile, let me know and I'll gladly help out.
However, I've put a notice on the Project page to suggest the Project be closed down. Shortly after starting it up I was away for over a month, and on returning realised that it's just too broad - looking at some of the more successful projects, they all focus on a narrow area were WP's content was significantly lacking and would therefore benefit from a concerted collaborative effort.
I do, however, intend to maintain the Portal and keep it updated. If you would like to help with this, drop a note at the Portal talkpage (or mine). I would like to set up a notice board of sorts to organise the efforts of those who want to keep the Portal going - apart from regularly showcasing new content and the news, those involved with the Portal can still help with things like voting for FA status and so forth, so it'd be good if you want to help out in this area. I've also posted on the village pump to ask what would be a more appropriate 'meeting place' for Portal maintenance people - its talk page or a designated notice board in the Wikipedia name space. If you have any ideas on how we can organise ourselves, let me know. Many thanks, --HighHopes (T)⋅⋅(C)⋅(E)⋅(P) 13:31, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
re: Cleanup Politics by country
thats it! thank you very much for your clean up. i just didnt like the mention of "article" as its rather self-referential and should use something like "topic" instead just like many other articles. well that is just my opinion. many ppl would think its ok. -- Zondor 13:34, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
yes, you can remove them. -- Zondor 13:39, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Disputed liberal character of Estonian Centre party
Dear Electionworld,
we were recently having a dispute about whether Estonian Centre Party might be called liberal. I just found out that there has already been a disussion on the same subject. I agree with the point of view of former Estonian politician Jüri Estam. I basically claimed the same. Please see [[1]]Constanz 16:33, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Electionwood and company think the Green Party is liberal. Or someone on here does.-gibby
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liberalism: would you consider changing your vote to speedy keep so we can get this over with? -- Jmabel | Talk 08:11, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
Finding the Political Slant of Wikipedians
I was wondering for awhile about this, and I was figured you'd be the person to go to on this. Maybe a chart or something at one of the Wikiprojects based on scores from politicalcompass.org? I dunno, let me know what you think. karmafist 04:37, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
- I've heard at times that Wikipedia is inherently "Liberal" by some here and there due to its users. I'd like to see if that's true and also get a feeling how WP's users see things politically since I lean towards Metapedianism and i'm curious about such things. karmafist 15:51, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
Ok, trying again
Ok, that's my idea -- users taking scores like that, and then putting them on something like this, and finding any patterns, if any. What do you think? karmafist 20:17, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
It's Getting There
That project of mine is growing by leaps and bounds, it's up to 8 people from 4 countries, and I was wondering if I could add your data. I also have a proposal for a legislature on Wikipedia i'm bandying about [[2]], which I also figured you'd be interested in considering your website. karmafist 06:09, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
About WikiProject Politics
Hello, I noticed that you signed up for the Politics project. I would like your input on a notice template that I am working on, you can see it here. I have had some trouble finding a suitable image for it, so if you know of a more appropriate image or if you can suggest any changes that might improve the template, please drop a line. --Robert Harrisontalk contrib 06:50, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Belarussian political parties
Hello. I've seen that you put in every article about a belarussian political party, At the last legislative elections, 13-17 October 2004, which international observers considered not to be free and fair [...]. There's no need for you to make lobby here my friend, nor to vandalize all articles in a sort of mental perforation to Wikipedia's users and readers.
If some countries accuse the elecctions of having been fraudulent (CIS observers didn't say so), that should be put were it corresponds, in Politics of Belarus, but not in every article, because it is quite POV to include biased data everywhere and as if it were something absolutely clear, confirmed and undisputed.
Even being liberal, I assume that being in politics and all, yo know about American attempts to overthrow Lukashenko by any means; they cannot accept Belarus to continue mantaining its own tradition, economy and society. Belarus is permanently under violent agression and FUDding, like are Cuba, Venezuela and almost every country that opposes American general mandates.
Wikipedia can't continue with that. Wikipedia, according to the NPOV policy, must express all the existant positions on a given topic, sustaining them by sources and outside links. If you just want to vandalize something, keep your time and stay quiet. I deeply ask you to reconsider your attitude in that series of articles -I don't know you so as to determine that you're always like that-, and revert, fulfill and/or put where it should go, the information you introduced.