Welcome!
|
DYK for Barrage Vauban
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- It actually hit 7,861 - 64 = 7,797, so I've added it to the the statistics page. Thanks for all your work on this and similar articles, and for nominating this for DYK. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 14:31, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, Chris! --Edelseider (talk) 07:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
DYK
Hello! Your submission of Palais des Fêtes at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America1000 05:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
November 2015
Your recent edit to List of anime conventions appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 18:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- I got it from your edit comment already but I understand that you prefer more people to know of my mistake and learn.:) Edelseider (talk) 18:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 4 November
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Christkindelsmärik, Strasbourg page, your edit caused a URL error (help). ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Palais des Fêtes
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Edit summaries, multiple consecutive edits
Hello Edelseider. A couple of general editing suggestions for you to consider:
- Please make a habit of providing an edit summary when you make a change to an article. Doing so makes it easier for your colleagues here to understand the intention of your edit.
- Plus, it will be easier for you and your co-editors to collaborate on articles if, instead of making multiple consecutive edits in rapid succession on an article, you use the "Show preview" button to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits. This keeps the page history of the article less cluttered.
Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric talk 16:43, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- Instead of thanking me for the work I do, you criticize me for the way I do it. I do multiple consecutive edits in order to avoid losses of session data while updating endless rows of numbers like here, here and here, something that requires patience and time. Well done, Eric, you have made a new friend! --Edelseider (talk) 17:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- I haven't looked at a lot of your work, but what I did see, I wasn't sure I wanted to thank you for. I don't find your recent observations on architecture in the Alsace-Champagne-Ardenne-Lorraine article to be quite encyclopedic in style, but didn't want to engage in reverting or editing them. In any case, it makes more work for your co-editors when you don't use edit summaries or the show preview button. Eric talk 18:56, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
- So you admit that you are being both superficial and judgemental. Keep away from me. --Edelseider (talk) 08:01, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- I haven't looked at a lot of your work, but what I did see, I wasn't sure I wanted to thank you for. I don't find your recent observations on architecture in the Alsace-Champagne-Ardenne-Lorraine article to be quite encyclopedic in style, but didn't want to engage in reverting or editing them. In any case, it makes more work for your co-editors when you don't use edit summaries or the show preview button. Eric talk 18:56, 16 January 2016 (UTC)