SandyGeorgia (talk | contribs) →Here's my word: buggers |
→Here's my word: *sigh* ..... Douglas Adams knew better, alas |
||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
I am Nunez99, an account I set up so that I could (at least occasionally) have a quiet life without all of the civility warriors harrasing me. I deliberately made that posting using the Nunez99 name because I don't want to be tempted to use it again. I do now accept that wikipedia isn't for me, as has repeatedly been made very clear to me. So long, and thanks for all the fish. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 19:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC) |
I am Nunez99, an account I set up so that I could (at least occasionally) have a quiet life without all of the civility warriors harrasing me. I deliberately made that posting using the Nunez99 name because I don't want to be tempted to use it again. I do now accept that wikipedia isn't for me, as has repeatedly been made very clear to me. So long, and thanks for all the fish. [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 19:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
: Darn it! [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 19:06, 17 April 2010 (UTC) |
: Darn it! [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 19:06, 17 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
::Malleus, you disrespect the memory of Douglas Admas - the point of the ''....all the fish'' quote was the the dolphins had received all the benefit for nothing and then just mosied on off. Clearly you efforts on WP and the thanks you got are exactly the other way round.... <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Pedro|<b>Pedro</b>]] : [[User_talk:Pedro|<font style="color:#accC10;background:#0000fa;"> Chat </font>]] </span></small> 19:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:28, 17 April 2010
Archive 1 May 2007 to Jan 2008 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
I appreciate the comments you left last time, and I've made changes to the article based on them. So far, nobody's come by to support or oppose the article, so do you think you could stop back by and do that, or suggest more changes if you think they are necessary? Thanks. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 06:44, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hello again. People are beginning to make their Support / Oppose decisions now at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/St. Michael's Cathedral, Qingdao/archive1, and I think the article is relatively complete, so I'd like to invite you to give it (another) look and weigh in one way or the other. Thanks! ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 10:25, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Quehanna Wild Area
<font=3> Thanks again for all your work reviewing sources. Quehanna Wild Area is now a featured article! Auntieruth55 (talk) and Ruhrfisch ><>°° 00:45, 28 March 2010 (UTC) |
---|
I fixed the couple outstanding issues, hopefully this review can be finalized now. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:14, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Mercia
Hope this doesn't count as a talkpage template. Metabaronic (talk) 21:43, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- LOL.. no, its the "talkback" templates I hate. Anything Wiki related needs to wait until after the summer for me, we're traveling a good bit this summer. Ealdgyth - Talk 21:48, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
This recent article might interest you. Any chance you know of how to expand it? GA is easy with this, but I think that after Court of Chancery FA should be possible. Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 18:36, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, who are you calling easy? I know what you mean though. :-) Malleus Fatuorum 18:53, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Other than a bit more about the actual Excheuquer - and mentioning the Dialogue Concerning the Exchequer - not much I can contribute. I really don't do the later Plantagenets... much less the Tudors. Ealdgyth - Talk 19:07, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Ooh, bugger. Ahh well! I might be writing an article on Attainder/corruption of the blood in a bit, which would be fun (particularly for the hook ...that corrupted blood was found approximately seven hundred years before World of Warcraft?) Ironholds (talk) 19:13, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Other than a bit more about the actual Excheuquer - and mentioning the Dialogue Concerning the Exchequer - not much I can contribute. I really don't do the later Plantagenets... much less the Tudors. Ealdgyth - Talk 19:07, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Request your thoughts
Hi Ealdgyth,
I'd like to see your thoughts on the article Jagdgeschwader 11. This article is currently undergoing review for GA. Since you had provided quality feedback on the A Class Review of its parent, Jagdgeschwader 1, I wish to know what you think if this article were to go for A class review later on. Thanks in advance for the time invested. ' Perseus 71 talk 00:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
When you're back…
When you're back (if you're not trapped under the Great Icelandic Dust Cloud), would you mind having a quick skim over St. Mary's Church, Chesham, in particular the early-history parts? The assorted Eadwigs, Ediths and Edwards blur together in my head, and it's entirely possible there's some glaringly obvious errors there. (You should like this one. Lots of Saxons and bishops.) – iridescent 20:44, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
- We don't leave for Europe for over a month... we're in Texas next week, however. I didn't see anything else that jumped out at me, though. Ealdgyth - Talk 21:16, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
- Texas, Europe, all the same thing… Thanks for having a look; there's still something that doesn't seem quite right to me about this one, but I can't put my finger on why. Aside from the fact that it's deathly dull, of course, but this is a topic it's impossible to make interesting. – iridescent 21:20, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Here's my word
I am Nunez99, an account I set up so that I could (at least occasionally) have a quiet life without all of the civility warriors harrasing me. I deliberately made that posting using the Nunez99 name because I don't want to be tempted to use it again. I do now accept that wikipedia isn't for me, as has repeatedly been made very clear to me. So long, and thanks for all the fish. Malleus Fatuorum 19:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Darn it! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:06, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Malleus, you disrespect the memory of Douglas Admas - the point of the ....all the fish quote was the the dolphins had received all the benefit for nothing and then just mosied on off. Clearly you efforts on WP and the thanks you got are exactly the other way round.... Pedro : Chat 19:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)